Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

In the United States, the steady yellow light means that a driver should either speed up or slow down. State laws written about a driver’s behavior at these yellow lights are vague and indeterminate and result in what is referred to as the dilemma zone (Hurwitz et al. in Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 15(2): 132–143, 2012). This paper will reconsider law’s vagueness as intentional rather than problematic, insofar as cultural understandings of the yellow light lead to a framework of visual jurisprudence in which drivers interact with law through legal discretion and common sense confronting a yellow light. Through a jurisprudential juxtaposition between the yellow light and red light cameras used to enforce yellow lights, the semiotics of automaticity compete with the semiotics of context-bound decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhatia, Vijay K., Christoph A. Hafner, Lindsay Miller, and Anne Wagner. 2012. Transparency, power, and control in legal communication. In Transparency, power and control: Perspectives on legal communication, ed. Vijay K. Bhatia, Christoph A. Hafner, Lindsay Miller, and Anne Wagner. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black, Donald. 1979. Common sense in the sociology of law. American Sociological Review 44(1): 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Braverman, Irus. 2010. Hidden in plain view: Legal geography from a visual perspective. Law, Culture, and the Humanities 7(2): 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Trolio, Tara. 2003. Slow yield on red. Governing 17(2): 48.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Director of Transportation, State of Hawaii. 2006. Hawaii driver’s manual. Honolulu: Hagadone Printing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas, Mary. 1992. Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Economides, Kim, Mark Blacksell, and Charles Watkins. 1986. The spatial analysis of legal systems: Towards a geography of law? Journal of Law and Society 13(2): 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ewick, Patricia, and Susan S. Silbey. 1998. The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hawkins, Keith. 1992. The use of discretion: Perspectives from law and social science. In The uses of discretion, ed. Keith Hawkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ho, Timothy, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Office of the Public Defender, State of Hawaii. 2012. Testimony of the Office of the Public Defender, State of Hawaii to the House Committee on Judiciary, February 9.

  11. Hurwitz, David S., Haizhong Wang, Michael A. Knodler Jr, Daiheng Ni, and Derek Moore. 2012. Fuzzy sets to describe driver behavior in the dilemma zone of high-speed signalized intersections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior 15(2): 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen, Cheryl. 2011. What to do at a yellow light? And other things American drivers don’t know. New York Times. Accessed March 19, 2013. http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/26/what-to-do-at-a-yellow-light-and-other-things-american-drivers-dont-know/.

  13. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keevak, Michael. 2011. Becoming yellow: A short history of racial thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levin, Joel. 1996. The paradox of jurisprudence. In Spaces and significations, ed. Roberta Kevelson, 181–190. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maryland Department of Transportation. 2013. Maryland driver’s manual. Accessed February 27, 2013. http://www.mva.maryland.gov/resources/dl-002b.pdf.

  17. North Dakota Department of Transportation. 2013. Rules of the road 20112013. Accessed March 9, 2013. http://www.dot.nd.gov/divisions/driverslicense/docs/rulesroad.pdf.

  18. Oregon State University. 2012. The ‘twilight zone’ of traffic costs lives at stoplight intersections. Accessed February 27, 2012. http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2012/mar/“twilight-zone”-traffic-costs-lives-stoplight-intersections.

  19. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2010. Law’s spatial turn: Geography, justice and a certain fear of space. Law, Culture and the Humanities 7(2): 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Porter, Bryan E., Kristie L. Johnson, and Johnie F. Bland. 2013. Turning off the cameras: Red Light running characteristics and rates after photo enforcement legislation expired. Accident Analysis and Prevention 50: 1104–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Regenold, Michele. 2007. From waving arms to LED’s: A brief history of traffic signals. Tech Transfer Newsletter, Fall. Accessed May 23, 2013. http://www.techtransfer.berkeley.edu/newsletter/07-4/traffic_signals.php.

  22. Scott, W.T. 1996. The empire of signs and the information revolution. In Spaces and significations, ed. Roberta Kevelson, 51–66. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharkey, Joe. 2011. The collision over traffic cameras. New York Times, July 4.

  24. Sherwin, Richard K. 2011. Visualizing law in the age of the digital baroque: Arabesques and entanglements. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Valverde, Mariana. 2003. Law’s dream of a common knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles. 2012. Virginia driver’s manual. Accessed February 27, 2013. http://www.dmv.state.va.us/webdoc/pdf/dmv39.pdf.

  27. Wagner, Anne. 2006. Rules of the road: A universal visual semiotics. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 19: 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiner, Mark S. 2006. Americans without law: The racial boundaries of citizenship. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Marusek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marusek, S. Visual Jurisprudence of the American Yellow Traffic Light. Int J Semiot Law 27, 183–191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-013-9323-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-013-9323-z

Keywords

Navigation