Skip to main content
Log in

The Stability of Market Shares in Liner Shipping

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ocean Shipping Reform Act (OSRA) of 1998 significantly shifted the industrial structure of liner shipping markets from one that was dominated by price-fixing liner shipping conferences to one that is dominated by non-binding discussion agreements, global alliances, and long-term confidential contracting. The objective of this paper is to determine the extent to which the abandonment of the liner conference system on U.S. trade lanes affected the market share stability of individual steamship lines. The approach is to estimate a model of market share variation in U.S. liner shipping markets and compare the results under the two separate regulatory regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Button, K. (1999). “Shipping alliances: Are they at the ‘core’ of solving instability problems in shipping?” Liner Shipping, What’s next? In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 1999 international association of maritime economists, Halifax: Nova Scotia.

  • Caves R.E., Porter M.E. (1978) Market structure, oligopoly, and stability of market shares. Journal of Industrial Economics 26(4): 289–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciaretta, A. (2002). Testing for market share stability and cartels, Working Paper WP—AD 2002-17. Retrieved May 25, 2011 from Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. http://www.ivie.es/downloads/docs/wpasad/wpasad-2002-17.pdf.

  • Federal Maritime Commission. (2000). The Ocean Shipping Reform Act: An interim status report. Retrieved March, 2008 from http://www.fmc.gov/assets/1/Page/OSRA_INTERIM_STATUS_REPORT.pdf.

  • Fox N. (1994) An oligopoly model of ocean liner shipping. Review of Industrial Organization 9(4): 343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gort M. (1963) Analysis of stability and change in market structure. Journal of Political Economy 71(1): 118–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green E., Porter R. (1984) Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica 52(1): 87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrilesky T., Barth R. (1969) Tests of market share stability in the cigarette industry 1950–1966. The Journal of Industrial Economics 17(2): 145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby N. (1964) The relative stability of market shares: A theory and evidence from several industries. Journal of Industrial Economics 12(2): 83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin A., Slade M. (1989) Cartels, collusion and horizontal merger. The Handbook of Industrial Organization I: 415–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato M., Honjo Y. (2006) Market share instability and the dynamics of competition: A panel data analysis of Japanese manufacturing industries. Review of Industrial Organization 28(2): 165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keithahn, C. (1978). The brewing industry. Federal Trade Commission Staff Report of the Bureau of Economics. Retrieved, March, 2010 from http://www.ftc.gov/be/econrpt/197812brewingindustry.pdf.

  • Levenstein M.C., Suslow V. (2006) What determines cartel success?. Journal of Economic Literature 44(1): 43–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuckin R. (1972) Entry, concentration and stability of market shares. Southern Economic Journal 38(3): 363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca R. (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review 14(3): 693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadogonas T., Droucopoulos V. (2006) Market share mobility in Greek manufacturing industry. Southeastern Europe Journal of Economics 1(2006): 81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • PIERS (Port Import Export Reporting Service, Newark, NJ). U.S. Global Container Report, various issues 1987–2005

  • Pirrong S. (1992) An application of core theory to the analysis of ocean shipping markets. Journal of Law and Economics 35(1): 89–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter R. H. (1983) A study of cartel stability: The joint executive committee 1880–1886. Bell Journal of Economics 14(2): 301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagers, C. (2006). The demise of regulation in ocean shipping: a study in the evolution of competition policy and the predictive power of microeconomics. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 39(3). 779 May, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler R. (1988) Market share instability in commercial airline markets and the impact of deregulation. Journal of Industrial Economics 36(3): 327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F., (1969). Market structure and the stability of investment. The American Economic Review, 59(2). In Papers and proceedings of the eighty-first annual meeting of the American Economic Association, pp. 72–79.

  • Sjostrom W. (1989) Collusion in ocean shipping: A test of monopoly and empty core models. Journal of Political Economy 97(5): 1160–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjostrom, W. (1993). Antitrust immunity for shipping conferences: An empty core approach. The Antitrust Bulletin, 38(Summer), 419–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger R., Wolak F. (1992) Collusive pricing with capacity constraints in the presence of demand uncertainty. The RAND Journal of Economics 23(2): 203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong J. (1996) Excluding capacity-constrained entrants through exclusive dealing: Theory and application to ocean shipping. The Journal of Industrial Economics 44(2): 115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Fusillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fusillo, M. The Stability of Market Shares in Liner Shipping. Rev Ind Organ 42, 85–106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-012-9359-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-012-9359-3

Keywords

Navigation