Skip to main content
Log in

The original sin in Finnegans Wake

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake is mainly about indecent behavior H. C. Earwicker committed while drunk, which is usually believed parallel with Adam’s sin, original sin of human kind. However, the details and the nature of the misdemeanor, as well as words and stories hidden in the text, indicate that it parallels mostly to the “original” sin committed by Noah, instead of Adam. This difference shows that Joyce composes and interprets human history in a new way in Finnegans Wake. His history begins from Noah’s family and has a dense sexual undertone because of Noah’s sin. In this book, Joyce also tries to end the original sin and gives human being a rebirth, not a religionary one but a literary and allegorical one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Dex at The Straight Dope Science Advisory Board indicates that on the severity of Noah's reaction, there are two main areas of speculation, one of which is that “Ham saw Noah having sex with someone other than Mrs. Noah” (Dex 2005/2010). However, I checked many printed materials and most of them only said that Noah had sex with his wife, though it was an indecent behavior at that time too (Ginzberg 1968, p. 80).

References

  • Augustinus Hipponensis. (2010). De gratia Christi et de peccato originali. http://www.sant-agostino.it/latino/grazia_cristo/index2.htm. Accessed 22 Nov 2010.

  • Aquinas, T. (2010). Summa theologiae. <http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/sth2075.html>. Accessed 14 Nov 2010.

  • Bassett, F. W. (1971). Noah’s nakedness and the curse of Canaan: A case of incest? Vetus Testamentum, 21, 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel., et al. (1962). Our exagmination round his factification for incamination of Work in Progress. Northampton: John Dickens & Conner Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benstock, B. (1965). Joyce-again’s wake: An analysis of Finnegans wake. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benstock, S. (1992). Sexuality and survival in Finnegans Wake. In P. A. McCarthy (Ed.), Critical Essays on James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake (pp. 186–192). New York: G. K. Hall & Co/Toronto: Maxwell Macmillan Canada.

  • Campbell, J., & Robinson, H. M. (1944). A skeleton key to Finnegans wake. New York: Harcourt Brace and Cop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catechism of the Catholic Church. (2010). <http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM>. Accessed 8 Nov 2010.

  • Colum, P. (1997). Review in New York Times 1939. In R. H. Deming (Ed.), James Joyce: The critical heritage (pp. 669–673). London: Routledge.

  • Dex. (2005/2010). What’s up with the biblical story of drunken Noah? (Part 1). The Straight Dope. <http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1875/whats-up-with-the-biblical-story-of-drunken-noah-part-1>. Accessed 28 Nov 2010.

  • Ellmann, R. (1983). James Joyce. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbane, M. (Ed.). (2004). The Jewish study Bible: Jewish Publication Society: Tanakh Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, H. J. Jr., et al. (1963). People of the Covenant: An introduction to the Old Testament. New York: The Ronald Press Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg, L. (1968). Legends of the Bible. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasheen, A. (1977). Third census of Finnegans wake. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (1962). Structure and motif in Finnegans wake. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. R. (2002). Noah’s curse: The biblical justification of American slavery. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, J. (1939). Finnegans Wake. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugel, J. L. (1997). The Bible as it was. Cambridge & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Norris, M. (1974). The decentered universe of Finnegans wake: A structuralist analysis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashkow, I. (2004). Sexuality in the Hebrew Bible: Freud’s Lens. In H. Ellens & W. Rollins (Eds.), Psychology and the Bible: A New Way to Read the Scriptures (Vol. 1, pp. 33–74). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

  • Sarna, N. M. (1989). Torah commentary: Genesis. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Holy Bible. (1984). New international version. Zondervan: Grand Rapids.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Congrong Dai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, C. The original sin in Finnegans Wake . Neohelicon 39, 475–483 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-012-0146-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-012-0146-9

Keywords

Navigation