Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate Spatial Modeling for Geostatistical Data Using Convolved Covariance Functions

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Soil pollution data collection typically studies multivariate measurements at sampling locations, e.g., lead, zinc, copper or cadmium levels. With increased collection of such multivariate geostatistical spatial data, there arises the need for flexible explanatory stochastic models. Here, we propose a general constructive approach for building suitable models based upon convolution of covariance functions. We begin with a general theorem which asserts that, under weak conditions, cross convolution of covariance functions provides a valid cross covariance function. We also obtain a result on dependence induced by such convolution. Since, in general, convolution does not provide closed-form integration, we discuss efficient computation.

We then suggest introducing such specification through a Gaussian process to model multivariate spatial random effects within a hierarchical model. We note that modeling spatial random effects in this way is parsimonious relative to say, the linear model of coregionalization. Through a limited simulation, we informally demonstrate that performance for these two specifications appears to be indistinguishable, encouraging the parsimonious choice. Finally, we use the convolved covariance model to analyze a trivariate pollution dataset from California.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., 1965, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables: Dover, New York, p. 374–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, M., Zhou, Z., and Zou, H., 2004, Conditionally specified space-time models for multivariate processes: submitted.

  • Diggle, P. J., Tawn, J. A., and Moyeed, R. A., 1998, Model based Geostatistics(with discussion): Appl. Stat., v. 47, no. 3, p. 299–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspari, G., and Cohn, S. E., 1999, Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions: Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., v. 125, p. 723–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand A. E., Kim H. J., Sirmans, C. F., and Banerjee, S. K., 2003, Spatial modeling with spatially varying coefficient processes: J. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 98, no. 462, p. 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., Schmidt A. M., Banerjee, S., and Sirmans, C. F., 2004, Nonstationary multivariate process modeling through spatially varying coregionalization (with discussion): Test, v. 13, no. 2, p. 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A.E., and Vounatsou, P., 2002, Proper multivariate conditional autoregressive models for spatial data analysis: Biostatistics, v. 4, p. 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higdon, D. M., 2001, Space and Space-time modeling using process convolutions: Technical reports, 01-03, Duke University, Institute of Statistical and Decision Sciences.

  • Mardia, K.V., and Goodall, C., 1993, Spatiotemporal analyses of multivariate environmental monitoring data, in Patil, G. P., and Rao, C. R., eds., Multivariate environmental statistics: Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 347–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D., 1991, Pseudo-cross variograms, positive-definiteness, and co-kriging: Math. Geol., v. 23, no. 6, p. 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sain, S., and Cressie, N., 2002, Multivariate lattice models for spatial environmental data: American Statistical Association Proceedings, p. 2820–2825.

  • Schmidt, A. M., and Gelfand, A. E., 2003, A Bayesian coregionalization approach for multivariate pollutant data: J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., v. 108, no. D24, p. 8783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. L., 1999, Interpolation of spatial data: Some theory for kriging: Springer Verlag, New York, p. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A., and Corsten, L. C. A., 1991, Universal kriging and cokriging as a regression procedure: Biometrics, v. 47, no. 2, p. 575–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ver Hoef, J. M., and Barry, R. P., 1998, Constructing and fitting models for cokriging and multivariate spatial prediction: J. Stat. Plan. Inference, v. 69, no. 2, p. 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, H., 2003, Multivariate geostatistics: An introduction with applications, 2nd ed.: Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, T., Myers, D. E., and Long A. E., 1995, Fitting matrix-valued variogram models by simultaneous diagonalization (Part I: Theory): Math. Geol., v. 27, no. 7, p. 867–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, T., Myers, D. E., and Long A. E., 1995, Fitting matrix-valued variogram models by simultaneous diagonalization (Part II: Application): Math. Geol., v. 27, no. 7, p. 877–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anandamayee Majumdar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Majumdar, A., Gelfand, A.E. Multivariate Spatial Modeling for Geostatistical Data Using Convolved Covariance Functions. Math Geol 39, 225–245 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-006-9072-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-006-9072-6

Keywords

Navigation