Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Influence of Leader’s Spiritual Values of Servant Leadership on Employee Motivational Autonomy and Eudaemonic Well-Being

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examined the role of leader’s spiritual values in terms of the “servant leadership” in the process of promoting employee’s autonomous motivation and eudaemonic well-being. Sample consists of 265 Chinese supervisor-subordinate dyads recruited from a variety of industries in Taiwan. Spiritual values perceived by the subordinates, as well as the discrepancy between leader-subordinate perceptions, but not the leader’s self-perceptions of spiritual values, were found to contribute significantly beyond transactional leadership in predicting subordinate motivational autonomy and eudaemonic well-being, and subordinate autonomous motivations fully mediates the relationship between spiritual values and eudaemonic well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, R., & Simkin, B. J. (2001). Open book, management-optimizing human capital. Business Horizons, 44, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expections. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Paloato, AC: Consulting Psychologist Press.

  • Bass, B. M., Paul, & Steidlmeier, (1999). Ethic, character and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benefiel, M. (2005). Soul at work: Spiritual leadership in organizations. New York: Seabury Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biberman, J. (Ed.). (2000). Work and spirit: A reader of new spiritual paradigms for organizations. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, M. A. (1997). Popular approaches to leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. (1994).Spirit at work: Discovering the spirituality in leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Cover, S. R. (1998). Servant leadership from the inside out. In L. Spears (Ed.), Insights on leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit, and servant-leadership. New York, NY: John Wiley.

  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. D.C: Heath and company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.). Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol.38: Perspectives on motivation. (pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11, 227–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Such, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese Context (pp. 85–127). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 693–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W. (2005). Toward a paradigm of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 619–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W., Vitucci, S., & Cedillo, M. (2005). Spiritual leadership and army transformation: Theory measurement and establishing a baseline. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 835–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, M., & Deci, E. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2003). Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenlaef, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A Journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.

  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J.,& Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-superior ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, M. (2003). Leadership. Henley Manager, 11, 6.

  • Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychology, 49, 493–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. B. (2000). Travel experience in the formation of leadership: John Quincy Adams, Frederick Douglass and Jane Addams. Journal of Leadership, 7, 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (1998). Synchronicity: The inner path of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jue, A. L. (2006). Practicing spirit-centered leadership: Lessons from a corporate layoff. In C. Gerus (Ed.), Leadership moments: Turning points that changed lives and organizations. Victoria, BC: Trafford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. (2003). From paternalism to the servant organization: Expanding the organizational leadership assessment (ola) model. Paper presented at the Regent University Servant leadership Roundtable. Virginia: Virginia Beach.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBreton, J. M., Hargis, M. B., Griepentrog, B., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. (2007). A multidimentional approach for evaluation variables in organizational research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 60, 475–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., Avey, J., Smith, C. R., & Li, X. (2008). More evidence on the value of Chinese workers’ psychological capital: A potentially unlimited competitive resource? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 818–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyerly, B., & Maxey, C. (2001). Learning partnerships. T & D., 55, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwogu, O. G. (2004). Servant leadership model: The role of follower self-esteem, emotional intelligence, and attributions on organizational effectiveness. http://www.regent.edu/acad/cls/2004 SLRoundtable/nwogu-2004SL.pdf.

  • Page, D., & Wong, T. P. (2000). A conceptual framework for measuring servant leadership. In S. Adjibolosoo (Ed.), The human factor in shaping the course of history and development. Lanham, M.D.: University/Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. A. (2003). Servant leadership theory: A theroetical model, digital dissertations. AAT3082719.

  • Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. I. I. I. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reave, L. (2005). Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 655–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. F., & Stone, A. G. (2002). A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23, 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation autonomy and the self in psychological development. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 40: Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 1–56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behavior in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 402–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Yi Ou, A. (2007). Cross national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33, 426–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, B. E. (2003). A holi definition of leadership. Puzzle Back Together. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Wong, C. S., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (1998). A longitudinal study of the job perception-job satisfaction relationships: A test of the three alternative specifications. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. C., &Lin, M. H. (1998). Transformational leadership and transactional leadership scale scale establishment. The Chinese test Association annual test, 44, 57–88. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organization.5th Ed. NJ: Upper Saddle River prentice Hall International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant from the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 97-2410-H-224-002). The authors thank Mr. Chin-Yuan Yang for assistance in data collection and effort in earlier literature review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin-Yi Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, CY., Chen, CH.V. & Li, CI. The Influence of Leader’s Spiritual Values of Servant Leadership on Employee Motivational Autonomy and Eudaemonic Well-Being. J Relig Health 52, 418–438 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9479-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9479-3

Keywords

Navigation