Skip to main content
Log in

I Could Never Quite Get It Together: Lessons for End-of –Life Care in Harold Pinter’s The Caretaker

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pinter’s play The Caretaker explores interpersonal tensions relating to terminal illness. This paper interrogates notions of care, suffering, ownership, dignity and the consequences of active intervention and inaction in two key sections of the play: Aston’s monologue concerning his own brutal treatment (active intervention) and Davies’s final rejection by the brothers who fail to provide accommodation and care (inaction). This interprofessional analysis combines theatrical and clinical perspectives to create insights which can enhance empathy improve decision-making in end of life care and can inform the education of healthcare professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Pinter, The Caretaker, London: Faber & Faber 1991. Subsequent references to this work appear in the text.

  2. For better, for worse,” National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy, accessed April 25, 2010. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2008report3/Downloads/SACT_summary.pdf.

References

  • Audrey S, J. Abel, J.M. Blazeby, S. Falk and R. Campbell. 2008. “What Oncologists Tell Patients About Survival Benefits of Palliative Chemotherapy and Implications for Informed Consent: Qualitative Study.” BMJ 337: a752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chochinov, H.M. 2007. “Dignity and the Essence of Medicine: the ABC and D of Dignity-Conserving Care.” BMJ 335: 184–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, J.E. 2009. “The Avoidance of Human Suffering.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52: 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, R. 2009. “Suffering and Healing - Our Core Business.” Palliative Medicine 23: 385–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, D., editor. 2002. Teaching Palliative Care: a Practical Guide. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munday, D.F. and E.J. Mather. 2008. “Informed Consent and Palliative Chemotherapy.” BMJ 337: 471–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, D.K. 1997. Harold Pinter and the New British Theatre. London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, H. 1998. “Writing for Theatre.” In Complete Works: One. London: Faber & Faber, 9–16.

  • Silvestri,G., R. Pritchard and H.G. Welch. 1998. “Preferences for Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer; Descriptive Study Based on Scripted Interviews.” BMJ 317: 771–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slevin, M.L., L. Stubbs, H.J. Plant, P. Wilson, W.M. Gregory, P.J. Armes and S.M. Domer. 1990. “Attitudes to Chemotherapy: Comparing Views of Patients with Cancer with those of Doctors, Nurses and the General Public.” BMJ 300: 148–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, J. 1997. “The Birthday Party: Its Origins, Receptions, Themes and Relevance for Today.” Cycnos 14: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • The, A-M., T. Hak, G. Koeter and G. van der Wal. 2000. “Collusion in Doctor-Patient Communication about Imminent Death: an Ethnographic Study.” BMJ 321: 1376–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Jeffrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeffrey, E., Jeffrey, D. I Could Never Quite Get It Together: Lessons for End-of –Life Care in Harold Pinter’s The Caretaker . J Med Humanit 33, 117–126 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-012-9173-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-012-9173-9

Keywords

Navigation