Skip to main content
Log in

Signaling or Not-Signaling: Variation in Vulnerability and Defense Tactics of Armored Ground Crickets (Acanthoplus Speiseri: Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Hetrodinae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male Orthoptera singing from exposed perches are at risk from acoustically- and visually-hunting predators. The defensive reactions of armored ground crickets (Acanthoplus speiseri) include falling silent, dropping from their perch, alarm stridulation and autohaemorrhaging. Male and female ground crickets show different reactivity (i.e. the number or intensity of defense tactics used) to predation, depending on level of exposure: calling males were more reactive when approached during daylight, compared with in the dark. During daylight, calling males were more reactive than silent, cryptic, males and females. The level of response presumably reflected the riskiness of the individual’s behavior and situation at that time. Plasticity of response to predation allows individuals to balance risky behavior (i.e. acoustic signaling from exposed perches) by being more reactive to potential threats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateman PW, Ferguson JWH (2004) Male mate choice and spermatophore size in the Botswana armoured ground cricket Acanthoplus discoidalis. Can, and how, do males judge female mating history? J Zool Lond 262:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2006) Sex, intimidation and severed limbs: the effect of simulated predator attack and limb autotomy on calling behavior and level of caution in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus Behav. Ecol Sociobiol 59:674–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2009) There will be blood: autohaemorrhage behaviour as part of the defence repertoire of an insect. J Zool Lond 278:342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belwood JJ, Morris GK (1987) Bat predation and its influence on calling behavior in neotropical katydids. Science 238:64–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boevé J-L, Schaffner U (2003) Why does the larval integument of some sawfly species disrupt so easily? The harmful hemolymph hypothesis. Oecologia 134:104–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bothma JDP (1966) Notes on the stomach contents of certain Carnivora (Mammalia) from the Kalahari Gemsbok Park. Koedoe 9:37–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burk T (1982) Evolutionary significance of predation on sexually signalling males. Fla Entomol 65:90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti E, Viglianisi FM (2005) Ecology of the calling song of two Namibian armoured ground crickets, Acanthoplus longipes and Acanthoproctus diadematus (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae Hetrodinae). Ethol Ecol Evol 17:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn GS (1991) A systematic revision of Enyaliopsis Karsh 1887 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Hetrodinae). T Am Entomol Soc 117:67–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzeschik K-H (1969) On the systematics, biology and ethology of Eugaster Serville (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Form Funct 1:46–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyssels FGM, Stoks R (2005) Threat-sensitive responses to predator attacks in a damselfly. Ethology 111:411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatle JD, Faragher SG (1998) Slow movement increases the survivorship of a chemically defended grasshopper in predatory encounters. Oecologia 115:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick AV (2000) Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 267:671–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heller K-G (1996) Unusual abdomino-alary, defensive stridulatory mechanism in the bushcricket Pantecphylus cerambycinus (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea, Pseudophyllidae). J Morphol 227:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irish J (1992) The Hetrodinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Bradypodidae) of southern Africa: systematics and phylogeny. Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum, Bloemfontein 8:393–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho J et al (1998) Male mating success and risk of predation in a wolf spider: a balance between sexual and natural selection? J Anim Ecol 67:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski K, Lakes-Harlan R (2011) Temporal patterns of intra- and interspecific acoustic signals differ in two closely related species of Acanthoplus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Hetrodinae). Zoology 114:29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurila A (2000) Behavioural responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles. Oikos 88:159–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lea AJ, Blumstein DT (2011) Age and sex influence marmot antipredator behavior during periods of heightened risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1525–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (2009) Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev 84:485–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Bednekoff PA (1999) Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am Nat 153:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1989) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughry WJ, McDonough CM (1989) Calling and vigilance in California ground squirrels: age, sex, and seasonal differences in responses to calls. Am Midl Nat 121:312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lymbery A, Bailey W (1980) Regurgitation as a possible antipredator defensive mechanism in the grasshopper Goniaea sp. (Acrididae, Orthoptera). J Aust Entomol Soc 19:129–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbata KJ (1992a) The biology and host plant specificity of Acanthoplus speiseri Brancsik (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Hetrodinae), a pest of grain crops. J Entomol Soc S Afr 55:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbata KJ (1992b) Some observations on the reproductive behaviour of Acanthoplus speiseri Brancsik (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Hetrodinae). Insect Sci Appl 13:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Minja E et al (1999) Integrated Pest Management (IPM) components for control of armored bush cricket on pearl millet and sorghum in farmers’ fields in Namibia and Zambia. ISMN 40:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore KA, Williams DD (1990) Novel Strategies in the complex defense repertoire of a stonefly (Pteronarcys dorsata) nymph. Oikos 57:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson SW (1994) Water replenishment following reflex bleeding in the blister beetle Decapotoma lunata Pallas (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Afr Entomol 2:21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DJ, and Hall MJ (2002) Sound Signalling in Orthoptera. In: Evans P. (ed) Advances in Insect Physiology, vol 29. Elsevier Ltd, pp 151–278

  • Sih A (1986) Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 67:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1992) Prey uncertainty and the balancing of antipredator and feeding needs. Am Nat 139:1052–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson SJ et al (2006) Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:4152–4156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith ME, Belk MC (2001) Risk assessment in western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis): do multiple cues have additive effects? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. (2001) STATISTICA (data analysis software system). www.statsoft.com. In, version 6 edn

  • Sword GA (2001) Tasty on the outside, but toxic in the middle: grasshopper regurgitation and host plant-mediated toxicity to a vertebrate predator. Oecologia 128:416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tikkanen P, Muotka T, Huhta A (1996) Fishless-stream mayflies express behavioural flexibility in response to predatory fish. Anim Behav 51:1391–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visagie R, Anderson MD (2006) Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni) road mortalities in the eastern Karoo, South Africa. Gabar 17:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav 16:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Kolluru GR (1998) Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q Rev Biol 73:415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding from the University of Pretoria. Special thanks go to Romie Jackson for her considerable help and entertaining company during data collection. This paper is dedicated to Jamie T. – ‘the things I’ve done and the things I’ve seen’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip W. Bateman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bateman, P.W., Fleming, P.A. Signaling or Not-Signaling: Variation in Vulnerability and Defense Tactics of Armored Ground Crickets (Acanthoplus Speiseri: Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Hetrodinae). J Insect Behav 26, 14–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-012-9329-5

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-012-9329-5

Keywords

Navigation