Abstract
Understanding signed quantities and its arithmetic is one of the challenging topics of middle school mathematics. The specialized content knowledge (SCK) for teaching integers includes understanding of a variety of representations that may be used while teaching. In this study, we argue that meanings of integers and integer operations form the foundation for the construction of SCK about representations used to teach integers. We report that teachers’ concerns about teaching the topic of integers implicate issues of meaning, although this may not always be explicitly acknowledged by teachers. We develop a framework of integer meanings synthesizing previous research, and describe how the framework allowed teachers to investigate a wide range of representations including contexts and thereby construct SCK in a professional development setting. Teachers constructed SCK by connecting various meanings of integers with one another and with representations including contexts. Teachers made two important shifts, from exclusively using the state meaning of integers to including the application of change meaning to representations and from exclusive use of formal models to including contexts to teach integer addition and subtraction. An implication of the study is that frameworks of meaning for key mathematical topics could be an important component of pre- and in-service teacher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
TE indicates teacher educator and 1 indicates which teacher educator it is out of the three.
References
Bajaj, R., & Kumar, R. S. (2012). A teaching learning sequence for integers based on real life context: A dream mall for children. In M. Kharatmal, A. Kanhere & K. Subramaniam (Eds.), Proceedings of national conference on mathematics education (pp. 86–89). Mumbai: HBCSE.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Carreño, E., Rojas, N., Montes, M. Á., & Flores, P. (2013). Mathematics teacher’s specialized knowledge. Reflections based on specific descriptors of knowledge. In Proceedings of the CERME (Vol. 8, pp. 2976–2984). Antalya: ERME.
Carrillo, J., Climent, N., Contreras, L. C., & Muñoz-Catalán, M. C. (2013). Determining specialised knowledge for mathematics teaching. In Proceedings of the CERME (Vol. 8, pp. 2985–2994). Antalya: ERME.
Chazan, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 2–10.
Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263–272.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.
Ernest, P. (1999). Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives. In D. Tirosh (Ed.), Forms of mathematical knowledge: Learning and teaching with understanding (pp. 67–83). Berlin: Springer.
Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on learning and teaching addition and subtraction of whole numbers. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 53–187). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Glaeser, G. (1981). Epistemology relative numbers. Research in Didactique of Mathematics, 2(3), 303–346.
Hefendehl-Hebeker, L. (1991). Negative numbers: Obstacles in their evolution from intuitive to intellectual constructs. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 26–32.
Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. (2014). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and its specificity to high school geometry instruction. In J. Jane-Jane Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 23–45). Berlin: Springer.
Hill, H. C. (2010). The nature and predictors of elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 513–545.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
Kieren, T. (1988). Personal knowledge of rational numbers: Its intuitive and formal development. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 162–181). Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Kumar, R. S., Subramaniam, K., & Naik, S. (2013). Professional development of in-service teachers in India. In B. Sriraman, J. Cai, K. H. Lee, L. Fan, Y. Shimizu, C. S. Lim & K. Subramaniam (Eds.), Abstracts of the first sourcebook on Asian research in mathematics education (pp. 207–211). Information Age Publishers.
Linchevski, L., & Livneh, D. (1999). Structure sense: The relationship between algebraic and numerical contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(2), 173–196.
Linchevski, L., & Williams, J. (1999). Using intuition from everyday life in ‘filling’ the gap in children’s extension of their number concept to include the negative numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 131–147.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Mitchell, R., Charalambous, C., & Hill, H. (2014). Examining the task and knowledge demands needed to teach with representations. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 37–60.
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2005). National curriculum framework. New Delhi: NCERT.
Schwartz, J. L. (1988). Intensive quantity and referent transforming arithmetic. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 41–52). Reston, Virginia: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Schwarz, B. B., Kohn, A. S., & Resnick, L. B. (1994). Positives about negatives: A case study of an intermediate model for signed numbers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(1), 37–92.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1–23.
Stephan, M., & Akyuz, D. (2012). A proposed instructional theory for integer addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 428–464.
Subramaniam, K. (2013). Research on the learning of fractions and multiplicative reasoning: A review. In S. Chunawala (Ed.), The epiSTEME reviews: Research trends in science, technology and mathematics education (Vol. 4). New Delhi: Macmillan.
Thompson, P. W., & Dreyfus, T. (1988). Integers as transformations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 115–133.
Vergnaud, G. (1982). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems. In T. Carpenter, J. Moser, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 39–59). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Vlassis, J. (2004). Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in ‘negativity’. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 469–484.
Vlassis, J. (2008). The role of mathematical symbols in the development of number conceptualization: The case of the minus sign. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), 555–570.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Worksheet 1
One of the difficulties that children face is in interpreting negative numbers. What does “−2” exactly mean? There are broad senses in which negative numbers or more generally integers (positive, negative numbers, and zero) are interpreted.
-
1.
As a change Change includes increase or decrease, movement up or down (or forward and backward), or positive or negative growth (e.g., total annual sales of a company).
Think of situations which involve change and can therefore be described using integers. The situations should be meaningful and interesting. Some suggested examples are given below. Think of more such examples.
-
∞
Increase–decrease: Make a table of the weight gained by a baby every week (may be negative, what does it indicate?),
-
∞
Movement forward/backward or up/down: Change in tennis ranking of a tennis player, change in run rate from over to over.
-
∞
Make a presentation of such data in a way that would be interesting to students.
-
2.
As a state We can specify the state of something we are interested in using integers but only when it is meaningful to talk about positive and negative states.
Think of such situations where integers represent sate. Some suggested examples are given below. Think of more such examples.
-
∞
Position of a lift in a building which also has basement floors
-
∞
Temperature of water in a freezer
-
∞
Again think of ways in which such situations can be presented in an interesting way to students.
-
3.
As relation between numbers and quantities An important point here is that this is a directed relation. The relation makes sense if we distinguish the direction of the relationship and use positive and negative numbers to indicate it.
Consider these two examples:
-
∞
Me and my sister are standing in a queue to buy ice-cream. How far is my sister from me?
-
∞
Me and my sister are on different floors of a tall building with several basement floor levels for parking. How far away is my sister from me?
-
∞
Why is it meaningful to give the answers to these questions using integers? Is there any difference between the two examples? Think of more examples where relations can be represented using integers.
Appendix 2: Class VI: integers
Daily Lesson Plan
Day 1
The chapter will be introduced using the DREAM MALL figure.
The child learns that to move upward there is a “+” button, and to move downwards “−” button is to be used. Using this idea, he can number the floors accordingly.
Movement problems
Suppose Sapna and Kiran are in the ice-cream parlor. Sapna wants to go to the movie hall, and Kiran wants to go for shopping. How many steps each would move?
Their attention can be brought to the point that each would move same number of steps but in different directions, they can answer using appropriate signs.
Discussion regarding the importance of using the correct sign will be done at this moment.
In the figure, the boat is on the sea level. The aeroplane is flying 2000 km above the sea level (sic). The submarine is at 800 km below sea level (sic). Express their distances from the sea level. Have you seen numbers with “−” sign earlier?
Every day we see the weather report in a newspaper or a TV. Do you know there are places where the temperature is <0 °C?
(Refer Text Book page 154) for the list of temperatures of 5 places in India.
Integers: The first numbers to be discovered were natural numbers i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4,… If we include 0 in this collection, we get a new collection of numbers known as whole numbers. Now we find that there are numbers like −1, −2, −3, −4,… known as negative numbers. If we put the whole numbers and negative numbers together, the new collection will look 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, … −1, −2, 3, −4, … and this new collection is called integers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
S. Kumar, R., Subramaniam, K. & Naik, S.S. Teachers’ construction of meanings of signed quantities and integer operation. J Math Teacher Educ 20, 557–590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9340-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9340-9