Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outlines of a Pedagogical Interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s Two Truths Doctrine

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s doctrine of the two truths that considers saṃvṛti and paramārtha-satya two visions of reality on which the Buddhas, for soteriological and pedagogical reasons, build teachings of two types: respectively in agreement with (for example, the teaching of the Four Noble Truths) or in contrast to (for example, the teaching of emptiness) the category of svabhāva. The early sections of the article show to what extent the various current interpretations of the Nāgārjunian doctrine of the dve satye—despite their sometimes even macroscopic differences—have a common tendency to consider the notion of śūnyatā as a teaching not based on, but equivalent to supreme truth. This equivalence—philologically questionable—leads to interpretative paths that prove inevitably aporetic: indeed, according to whether the interpretation of śūnyatā is ‘metaphysical’ or ‘anti-metaphysical’, it gives rise to readings of Nāgārjuna’s thought incompatible, respectively, with anti-metaphysical and realistic types of verses traceable in the works of the author of the Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā (MMK). On the contrary, by giving more emphasis to the expression samupāśritya (“based on”), which recurs in MMK.24.8, and therefore, by epistemologically separating the notion of śūnyatā from the notion of paramārtha-satya (and of some of its conceptual equivalents such as nirvāṇa, tattva and dharmatā), we may obtain an interpretation—at once realistic and anti-metaphysical—of the theory of the two truths compatible with the vast majority (or even totality) of Nāgārjuna’s verses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AKBh:

Akutobhayā

ASt:

Acintyastava

ChL:

Chung-lun

DN:

Dīgha Nikāya

LSt:

Lokātītastava

MA:

Madhyamakāvatāra

MMK:

Mūlamadhyamakakārikā

MN:

Majjhima Nikāya

PP:

Prasannapadā

SN:

Saṃyutta Nikāya

ŚS:

Śūnyatāsaptati

VP:

Vaidalyaprakaraṇa

VV:

Vigrahavyāvartanī

YṢ:

Yuktiṣaṣṭikā

YṢvṛ:

Yuktiṣaṣṭikā-vṛtti

References

Dictionaries

  • Edgerton, F. (1996). Buddhist hybrid Sanskrit dictionary and grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet, G. (2012). Héritage du Sanskrit: Dictionnaire sanskrit-français. http://sanskrit.inria.fr/.

  • Monier-Williams, M. (1986). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Etymologically and philologically arranged with special reference to cognate indo-european languages. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

Texts (Editions and Translations)

  • Āryadeva, Catuḥśatakaśāstrakārikā, in Sonam, R. and Rinchen, G. S. (2008). Āryadeva’s Four hundred Stanzas on the Middle Way. New York: Snow Lion.

  • Bhāviveka, Prajñāpradīpa, chap. 24, in Uryuzu, R. (1971). Bhāvaviveka’s Prajñāpradīpa (Chpater 24). The research Bulletin of the Faculty of General Education, The Faculty of General Education, Kinki Unversity, Osaka, 2(2), 15-56.

  • Bhāviveka, Madhyamahṛdayavṛtti-Tarkajvālā, in Eckel, M. (2008). Edition and translation of Tarkajvālā, chapters 4 and 5. Bhāviveka and His Buddhist Opponents. Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press.

  • Bhāviveka, Madhyamahṛdayavṛtti-Tarkajvālā, in Heitmann, A. (2004). Nektar der Erkenntnis. Buddhistische Philosophie des 6 Jh. Bhavyas Tarkajvālā I-III. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 26.

  • Candrakīrti, Madhyamakāvatāra, in Huntington, C. (1989). The emptiness of emptiness. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Candrakīrti, Prasannapadā, in May, J. (1959). Prasannapadā Madhyamakavṛtti: Douze chapitres traduits du sanscrit e du tibétain. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.

  • Candrakīrti, Prasannapadā, in La Vallée Poussin, L. (1903-1913). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapadā Commentaire de Candrakīrti. St. Petersburg: Bibliotheca Buddhica IV.

  • Candrakīrti, Yuktiṣaṣṭikāvṛtti, in Loizzo, J. (2007). Nāgārjuna′s Reason Sixty Yuktiṣaṣṭikā, with Candrakīrti′s Commentary Yuktiṣaṣṭikāvṛtti. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Ch’ng-Mu (Piṅgala? Vimalākṣa?), Chung-lun (Akutobhayā?), in Bocking, B. (1993). Nāgārjuna in China. A Translation of the Middle Treatise. Lewiston- Queenston, Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press.

  • Dīgha Nikāya, in Pāli Sutta-piṭaka, http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/

  • Kumārila Bhaṭṭa, Ślokavārttika, in Ganga Nath Jha. (1983, 1ª ed. 1900-1908). Ślokavārtika, Translated from the original Sanskrit with extracts from the commentaries “Kasika” of Sucarita Misra and “Nyayaratnakara” of Partha Sarthi Misra. Delhi: Śri Satguru Publications.

  • Majjhima Nikāya, in Pāli Sutta-piṭaka, http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/

  • Nāgārjuna, Acintyastava, in Lindtner, C. (1997). Master of Wisdom. Writings of the Buddhist Master Nāgārjuna. Translations and Studies. Cazadero California: Dharma Publishing, 163-171.

  • Nāgārjuna, Lokātītastava, in Lindtner, C. (1997). Master of Wisdom. Writings of the Buddhist Master Nāgārjuna. Translations and Studies. Cazadero California: Dharma Publishing, 158-162.

  • Nāgārjuna, Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, in Ye S. (2011). Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā. New Editions of the Sanskrit, Tibetan and Chinese Versions, with Commentary and a Modern Chinese Translation. Shanghai: Zhongxi Book Company.

  • Nāgārjuna, Śūnyatāsaptati, in Lindtner, C. (1997). Master of Wisdom. Writings of the Buddhist Master Nāgārjuna. Translations and Studies. Cazadero California: Dharma Publishing, 95-119.

  • Nāgārjuna, Vaidalyaprakaraṇa, in Tola, F., and Dragonetti, C. (1995). Vaidalyaprakaraṇa. Edition of the Tibetan text, English Translation and Commentary, with Introduction and Notes. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Nāgārjuna, Vigrahavyāvartanī, in Johnston, E. H., and Kunst, A. (1951). The Vigrahavyāvartanī of Nāgārjuna, with the author′s commentary. Institute Belge des Hautes Études Chinoises, Bruxelles: The Saint Catherine Press.

  • Nāgārjuna, Yuktiṣaṣṭikā, in Lindtner, C. (1997). Master of Wisdom. Writings of the Buddhist Master Nāgārjuna. Translations and Studies. Cazadero California: Dharma Publishing, 72-93.

  • Saṃyutta Nikāya, in Pāli Sutta-piṭaka, http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/

Studies

  • Berger, D. L. (2010). Acquiring emptiness: Interpreting Nāgārjuna’s MMK 24:18. Philosophy East and West, 60(1), 40–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst, J. (1993). On the method of interpreting philosophical Sanskrit texts: Claus Oetke [...] Andrew P. Tuck. Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques, 47(3), 501–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugault, G. (1983). Logic and dialectics in the Madhyamakakārikās. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 11, 7–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugault, G. (1992). Nāgārjuna: Examen critique do nirvāṇa (Nirvāṇa-parīkṣa). Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques, 46(1), 83–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugault, G. (1994). L’Inde pense-t-elle? Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

  • Ferraro, G. (2012.1). Differenza epistemologica e identità ontologica tra saṃsāra e nirvāṇa nel pensiero buddhista. Trans/Form/Ação, 35(1), 193–212.

  • Ferraro, G. (2012.2). Verdade ordinária e verdade suprema como bases dos ensinamentos budistas no pensamento de Nāgārjuna. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

  • Ferraro, G. (2013). A criticism of M. Siderits and J. L. Garfield’s ‘semantic interpretation’ of Nāgārjuna’s theory of two truths. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(2), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganeri, J. (2007). The concealed art of the soul. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. L. (2002). Empty Words. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. L. (2008). Turning a Madhyamaka trick: Reply to Huntington. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 36(4), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. L. (2009). Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (Fundamental Verses of the Middle Way): Chapter 24: Examination of the Four Noble Truths. In W. Edelglass & J. L. Garfield (Eds.), Buddhist philosophy: Essential readings (pp. 26–34). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnoli, R. (1979). Le stanze del cammino di mezzo (Madhyamaka kārikā). Torino: Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, L. O. (2000). Two jars on two tables: Reflections on the Two Truths. In J. Silk (Ed.), Wisdom, compassion, and the search for understanding. The buddhist studies legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao (pp. 95–136). Honolulu: University of Hawaii press.

  • Griffiths, P. (2000). Review of D. Burton’s Emptiness appraised. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 7, 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, P. (1988). Dignāga on the interpretation of signs. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, P. (1994). Nagarjuna’s appeal. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 22(4), 299–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inada, K. (1993) (1ª ed. Tokyo, 1970). Nāgārjuna. A Translation of his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, with an Indtroductory Essay. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.

  • Kalupahana, D. (1991) Mūlamadhyamakakārikā of Nāgārjuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way. Introduction, Sanskrit Text, English Translation and Annotation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Lindtner, C. (1981). Atiśa’s introduction to the two truths, and its sources. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 9, 161–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCagney, N. (1997). Nāgārjuna and the philosophy of openness. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvilley, T. (2002). The shape of ancient thought. New York: Allworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murti, T. R. V. (1980) (1ª ed. 1955). The central philosophy of Buddhism. London: Allen & Unwin.

  • Nagao, G. M. (1992). Mādhyamika and Yogācāra. Delhi: Indian Books Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narain, H. (1997). The Mādhyamika mind. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetke, C. (1991). Remarks on the interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 19(3), 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oetke, C. (2003). Some remarks on thesis and philosophical position in early Madhyamaka. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 31(4), 449–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oetke, C. (2007). On MMK.24.18. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandeya, R., & Manju, C. (1991). Nāgārjuna’s philosophy of no-identity. Delhi: Eastern Book Linkers.

  • Pye, M. (1978). Skilfull means: A concept in Mahāyāna Buddhism. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. H. (1972). Did Nāgārjuna really refute all philosophical views? Philosophy East and West, 22(3), 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, A. (2007). Is Nāgārjuna a Mādhyamika? Studies in the Saddharma-puṇḍarīka-sūtra and Mahāyāna Scriptures, 153–164.

  • Schroeder, J. (2004). Skillful means: The heart of Buddhist compassion. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfort Ruegg, D. (1981). The literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, E. (2007). Creative ignorance: Nāgārjuna on the ontological significance of consciousness. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 30(1–2), 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, E. (2010). The commitments of a Madhyamaka Trickster: Innovation in Candrakīrti’s Prasanna-padā. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 38(4), 379–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, M. (1980). The Madhyamaka Critique of Epistemology I. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 8, 307–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, M. (1988). Nagarjuna as anti-realist. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 16(4), 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, M. (2003). On the soteriological significance of emptiness. Contemporary Buddhism, 4(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, M. (2007). Buddhism as a philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprung, M. (1973). The Mādhyamika doctrine of two realities as a metaphysic. In M. Sprung (Ed.), The problem of two truths in Buddhism and Vedanta (pp. 40–53). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sprung, M. (1979). Lucid Exposition of the Middle Way. The Essential Chapters from Prasannapadā of Candrakīrti Translated from Sanskrit. Boulder, CO: Prajñā Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stcherbatsky, T. (2003) (1ª ed. 1927). The conception of Buddhist Nirvāṇa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Streng, F. J. (1973). The significance of Pratītyasamutpāda for understanding the relationship between Saṃvṛti and Paramārthasatya in Nāgārjuna. In M. Sprung (Ed.), The problem of two truths in Buddhism and Vedanta (pp. 27–39). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tachikawa, M. (1997). An introduction to the philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillemans, T. (2001). Trying to be fair to Mādhyamika Buddhism. In The Numata Yehan lecture in Buddhism (pp. 507–523). Calgary: University of Calgary.

  • Tola, F., & Dragonetti, C. (1995). On voidness. A study on Buddhist Nihilism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, A. (1990). Comparative philosophy and the philosophy of scholarship. On western interpretation of Nāgārjuna. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walser, J. (2005). Nāgārjuna in context. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warder, A. K. (1973). Is Nāgārjuna a Mahāyanist? In M. Sprung (Ed.), The problem of two truths in buddhism and vedanta (pp. 78–88). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Wood, T. E. (1994). Nāgārjunian disputations. A philosophical journey through an Indian looking-glass. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Philosophy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Giuseppe Ferraro

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Ferraro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Ferraro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferraro, G. Outlines of a Pedagogical Interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s Two Truths Doctrine. J Indian Philos 41, 563–590 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9185-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9185-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation