Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mesohabitat use by bullhead (Cottus gobio)

  • Primary research paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat composition and connectivity within a stream vary with changing flows but the influence of changing flow on habitat use by fish is not well understood. Meso- and microhabitat surveys were used to investigate habitat use by bullhead (Cottus gobio Linnaeus) in response to discharge variation in a small tributary of the Upper Severn, England. Mesohabitat mapping surveys were carried out over a range of summer flows (0.016–0.216 m3 s−1) and were coupled with direct underwater observations (snorkelling) of fish location. Five mesohabitat types—glides, runs, riffles, chutes and pools—were present in the reach at all flows surveyed and ‘backwaters’ were found at three flows. The macro-morphology of the reach comprised six riffle–pool sequences divided into 27 mesohabitats with the maximum diversity (23 mesohabitats) at intermediate flows (Q 43) and only 15 mesohabitats at Q 95. Despite low numbers of fish (N = 78), bullhead displayed a strong association (51% of the fish) with glides—relatively deep habitats having high rates of velocity increase with flow. However, 54% of the fish were observed in two large, persistent mesohabitats, a glide (34%) and a pool (20%), both located below a faster flowing mesohabitat. Habitat use curves based upon micro-habitat data showed bullhead favoured low velocities (<0.30 m s−1), depths less than 0.30 m and a cobble substratum. This study illustrates the value of cross-scale investigations in linking fish ecology, flow and physical habitat variability and suggests mesohabitat size, persistence and arrangement may influence fish distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adis, J. & W. J. Junk, 2002. Terrestrial invertebrates inhabiting lowland river floodplains of Central Amazonia and Central Europe: a review. Freshwater Biology 47: 711–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. D., I. Pardo & A. Brown, 1995. Temporal constancy of faunal assemblages in ‘mesohabitats’ – application to management. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 133: 367–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. G., G. H. Copp & V. Szomlai, 2004. Seasonal abundance and microhabitat use of bullhead Cottus gobio and accompanying fish species in the river Avon (Hampshire), and implications for conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowx, I. G. & J. P. Harvey, 2003. Monitoring the Bullhead, Cottus gobio. English Nature, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J. & L. Greenberg, 1996. Effects of habitat structure on habitat use by Gammarus pulex in artificial streams. Freshwater Biology 36: 487–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, A. J. H., S. J. Hawkins, G. F. Turner & C. P. Doncaster, 2005. Size-dependent microhabitat use and intraspecific competition in Cottus gobio. Journal of Fish Biology 67: 428–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downhower, J. F., P. Lejeune, P. Gaudin & L. Brown, 1990. Movements of the Chabot (Cottus gobio) in a small stream. Polskie Archivum Hydrobiologii 37: 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency, 2003. River Habitat Survey in Britain and Ireland. Environment Agency.

  • Fausch, K. D., C. E. Torgesen, C. V. Baxter & H. W. Li, 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52: 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. & H. Kummer, 2000. Effects of residual flow and habitat fragmentation on distribution and movement of bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) in an alpine stream. Hydrobiologia 422(423): 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, P. J., 1978. The population dynamics of the bullhead (Cottus gobio) with special reference for spawning, mortality of young fish and homeostatic mechanisms. PhD Thesis, Reading University.

  • Harby, A., M. Baptist, M. J. Dunbar & S. Schmutz (eds), 2004. Cost Action 626 Report: State-of-the-art in data sampling, modelling analysis and applications of river habitat modelling.

  • Hawkins, C. P., P. Kershner, A. Bisson, D. Bryant, L. M. Decker, S. V. Gregory, D. A. McCullogh, C. K. Overton, G. H. Reeves, R. J. Steedman & M. K. Young, 1993. A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features. Fisheries 18: 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heggenes, J. & S. J. Saltveit, 1990. Seasonal and spatial microhabitat selection and segregation in young Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and brown trout, Salmo trutta L., in a Norwegian river. Journal of Fish Biology 36: 707–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, T. M., J. S. Richardson & N. Yonemitsu, 2006. Flow-substrate interactions create and mediate leaf litter resource patches in streams. Freshwater Biology 51: 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knaepkens, G., L. Bruyndoncx, L. Bervoets & M. Eens, 2002. The presence of artificial stones predicts the occurrence of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio) in a regulated lowland river in Flanders (Belgium). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 11: 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knaepkens, G., L. Bruyndoncx, J. Coeck & M. Eens, 2004a. Spawning habitat enhancement in the European bullhead (Cottus gobio), an endangered freshwater fish in degraded lowland rivers. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 2443–2452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knaepkens, G., L. Bruyndoncx & M. Eens, 2004b. Assessment of residency and movement of the endangered bullhead (Cottus gobio) in two Flemish rivers. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 13: 317–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, G. A., S. V. Gregory, L. R. Ashkenas, R. C. Wildman & A. D. Steinman, 1989. Influence of channel geomorphology on retention of dissolved and particulate matter in a cascade mountain stream. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-110.

  • Langford, T. E. & S. J. Hawkins, 1997. The distribution and abundance of three fish species in relation to timber debris and mesohabitats in a lowland forest stream during autumn and winter. Limnetica 13: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legalle, M., S. Mastrorillo, F. Santoul & R. Céréghino, 2004. Ontogenetic microhabitat shifts in the bullhead Cottus gobio L., in a fast flowing stream. International Review of Hydrobiology 90: 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legalle, M., F. Santoul, J. Figuerola, S. Mastrorillo & R. Céréghino, 2005. Factors influencing the spatial distribution patterns of the bullhead (Cottus gobio L., Teleostei Cottidae): a multi-scale study. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1319–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lytle, D. A. & N. L. Poff, 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maddock, I., P. & K. Lander, 2002. Testing the effectiveness of rapid habitat mapping to describe instream hydraulics. Unpublished paper, 4th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Cape Town, South Africa, March 2002.

  • Maddock, I., P. N. Smolar-Žvanut & G. Hill, 2008. The effect of flow regulation on the distribution and dynamics of channel geomorphic units (cgus) and implications for marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) spawning habitat in the Soča River, Slovenia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Sciences 4: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson, M. D., D. M. Harper, C. L. Padmore, J. L. Kemp & B. Vogel, 1998. A cost effective approach for linking habitats, flow types and species requirements. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newson, M. D. & C. L. Newson, 2000. Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Progress in Physical Geography 24: 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmore, C. L., 1997. Biotopes and their hydraulics: a method for determining the physical component of freshwater habitat quality. In Boon, P. J. & D. L. Howell (eds), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable. HMSO, Edinburgh: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasiewicz, P., 2001. MesoHABSIM: a concept for application of instream flow models in river restoration planning. Fisheries 26: 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasiewicz, P., 2007. Arena: the MesoHABSIM model revisited. River Research and Applications 23: 893–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, M., N. Punchard & A. Jowitt, 1997. The Habitat Requirements of Bullhead (Cottus gobio) and Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) in the Headwaters of Norfolk rivers: Implications for Conservation and Fisheries. ECON, Ecological Consultancy & Environment Agency, Eastern Area, Peterborough: 50.

  • Petts, G. E., 2009. Instream flow science for sustainable river management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45: 1071–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E., J. Nestler & R. Kennedy, 2006. Advancing science for water resources management. Hydrobiologia 565: 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, J. T. & G. D. Grossman, 2007. Size-dependent territoriality of mottled sculpin in a Southern Appalachian stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 1750–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. & J. K. H. Zimmerman, 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform environmental flows science and management. Freshwater Biology 55: 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richeter, R. E. Sparks & J. C. Stromberg, 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47: 769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, L. L., J. S. Richardson & M. C. Healey, 2000. Macroinvertebrate community structure along gradients of hydraulic and sedimentary conditions in a large gravel-bed river. Freshwater Biology 45: 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roni, P., 2002. Habitat use by fishes and pacific giant salamanders in small western Oregon and Washington streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 743–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, J.-M. & A. Bardonnet, 1996. Changements d’habitat de la truite (Salmo trutta) et du chabot (Cottus gobio) au cours du nychtémère. Approches multivariées à différentes échelles spatiales. Cybium 20: 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, C. B., K. D. Bovee & T. J. Waddle, 1996. Importance of the temporal aspects of habitat dynamics to fish population studies. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, D., P. D. Armitage, M. A. Bickerton & K. A. Hall, 2000. Assessing stream quality using information on mesohabitat distribution and character. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 10: 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M. L. & M. R. Perrow, 2003. Ecology of the Bullhead. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series No. 4. English Nature, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadeson, L. A., 1994. A geomorphological approach to the identification and classification of instream flow environments. South African Journal of Aquatic Sciences 20: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. W., C. L. Gerstner & S. T. Minton, 1996. Station-holding by the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi (Teleostei: Cottidae), and other fishes. Copeia 2: 488–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. M.-P. Gosselin

    Present address: Department of Biology, Karlstad University, 651 88, Karlstad, Sweden

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK

    M.-P. Gosselin

  2. University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London, UK

    G. E. Petts

  3. Institute of Science and the Environment, University of Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK

    M.-P. Gosselin & I. P. Maddock

Authors
  1. M.-P. Gosselin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. E. Petts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. P. Maddock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.-P. Gosselin.

Additional information

Handling editor: L. C. Gomes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gosselin, MP., Petts, G.E. & Maddock, I.P. Mesohabitat use by bullhead (Cottus gobio). Hydrobiologia 652, 299–310 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0363-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0363-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation