Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural Selection, Adaptive Topographies and the Problem of Statistical Inference: The Moraba scurra Controversy Under the Microscope

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper gives a detailed narrative of a controversial empirical research in postwar population genetics, the analysis of the cytological polymorphisms of an Australian grasshopper, Moraba scurra. This research intertwined key technical developments in three research areas during the 1950s and 1960s: it involved Dobzhansky’s empirical research program on cytological polymorphisms, the mathematical theory of natural selection in two-locus systems, and the building of reliable estimates of natural selection in the wild. In the mid-1950s the cytologist Michael White discovered an interesting case of epistasis in populations of Moraba scurra. These observations received a wide diffusion when theoretical population geneticist Richard Lewontin represented White’s data on adaptive topographies. These topographies connected the information on the genetic structure of these grasshopper populations with the formal framework of theoretical population genetics. As such, they appeared at the time as the most successful application of two-locus models of natural selection to an empirical study system. However, this connection generated paradoxical results: in the landscapes, all grasshopper populations were located on a ridge (an unstable equilibrium) while they were expected to reach a peak. This puzzling result fueled years of research and triggered a controversy attracting contributors from Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. While the original problem seemed, at first, purely empirical, the subsequent controversy affected the main mathematical tools used in the study of two-gene systems under natural selection. Adaptive topographies and their underlying mathematical structure, Wright’s mean fitness equations, were submitted to close scrutiny. Suspicion eventually shifted to the statistical machinery used in data analysis, reflecting the crucial role of statistical inference in applied population genetics. In the 1950s and 1960s, population geneticists were not simply in search for new generalizations about the evolutionary process and for new evidence about genetic variation: struggling against statistical artifacts, they were searching for reliable tests and descriptors to analyze their data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R.W. and Wehrhahn, C. 1964. “A Theory Which Predicts Stable Equilibrium for Inversion Polymorphisms in the Grasshopper Moraba scurra.” Evolution 18(1): 129–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.J. and Campbell, C.A. 1974. “Frequency-Dependent Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidau, C.J. and Martí, D.A. 2010. “110 Years of Orthopteran Cytogenetics, the Chromosomal Evolutionary Viewpoint, and Michael White’s Signal Contributions to the Field.” Journal of Orthoptera Research 19(2): 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackith, R.E. and Blackith, R.M. 1966. “The Food of Morabine Grasshoppers.” Australian Journal of Zoology 14: 877–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackith, R.E. and Blackith, R.M. 1969. “Variation of Shape and of Discrete Anatomical Characters in the Morabine Grasshoppers.” Australian Journal of Zoology 17(4): 697–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, M.T. 2006. “Robert Wayne Allard 1919–2003.” In Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

  • Colgan, D.J. and Cheney, J. 1980. “The Inversion Polymorphism of Keyacris scurra and the Adaptive Topography.” Evolution 34(1): 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M.R. and Skipper, Jr., R.A. 2012. “A Shifting Terrain: A Brief History of the Adaptive Landscape.” E. Svensson and R. Calsbeek (eds.), The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. and Levene, H. 1948. “Genetics of Natural Populations. XVII. Proof of Operation of Natural Selection in Wild Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 33(6): 537–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewens, W.J. 2004. Mathematical Population Genetics, Vol. I. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics. New York: Springer.

  • Forber, P. 2009. “Spandrels and a Pervasive Problem of Evidence.” Biology and Philosophy 24(2): 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1956. “The Estimation of Viabilities.” Journal of Genetics 54(2): 294–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. 2008. “The End of the Adaptive Landscape Metaphor?’ Biology and Philosophy 23(5): 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. 1975. “General Two-Locus Selection Models: Some Objectives, Results and Interpretations.” Theoretical Population Biology 7(3): 364–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key, K.H.L. 1965. “Generic Assignment of the Species Hitherto Known as Moraba scurra Rehn (Orthoptera: Acridoidea).” Australian Journal of Entomology 4(1): 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1956. “A Model of a Genetic System Which Leads to Closer Linkage by Natural Selection.” Evolution 10(3): 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1955. “The Effects of Population Density and Composition on Viability.” Evolution 9(1): 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1958. “A General Method for Investigating the Equilibrium of Gene Frequency in a Population.” Genetics 43(3): 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1963. “Models, Mathematics and Metaphors.” Synthese 15(1): 222–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1967. “Population Genetics.” Annual Review of Genetics 1(1): 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1982. “Keeping It Clean.” Nature 300: 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., Paul, D., Beatty, J., and Krimbas, C.B. 2001. “Interview of RC Lewontin.” R.S. Singh (ed.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical Philosophical and Political Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. and Cockerham, C.C. 1959. “The Goodness-of-fit Test for Detecting Natural Selection in Random Mating Populations.” Evolution 13(4): 561–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. and Feldman, M.W. 1988. “A General Asymptotic Property of Two-Locus Selection Models.” Theoretical Population Biology 34(2): 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. and Kojima, K.I. 1960. “The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Polymorphisms.” Evolution 14(4): 458–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., Wallace, B., Moore, J., and Provine, W.B. 1981. Dobzhansky’s Genetics of Natural Populations I–XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. and White, M.J.D. 1960. “Interaction Between Inversion Polymorphisms of Two Chromosome Pairs in the Grasshopper, Moraba scurra.” Evolution 14(1): 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.C. 1955a. Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.C. 1955b. “The Stability of an Equilibrium and the Average Fitness of a Population.” The American Naturalist 89(848): 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, D.A. and Batterham, P. 1993. “Australian Genetics: A Brief History.” Genetica 90(2–3): 81–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, L.E. and Gregg, T.G. 1969. Population Genetics and Evolution. Prentice-Hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1963a. “On the Measurement of Natural Selection Dependent on Several Loci.” Evolution 17(2): 182–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1963b. “On the Nonexistence of Adaptive Topographies.” Annals of Human Genetics 27(4): 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W.J. and McCann, D. 1994. “Michael James Denham White.” Biographical Memoirs of fellows of the Royal Society 40: 402–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plutynski, A. 2008. “The Rise and Fall of the Adaptive Landscape?’ Biology and Philosophy 23(5): 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.R. 1994. “Molecular Techniques in Population Genetics: A Brief History.” B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G.P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle (eds.), Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. Experientia Suppplementum 69, Basel: Springer, pp. 131–156.

  • Prakash, S. 1967. “Chromosome Interactions in Drosophila robusta.” Genetics 57(2): 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T. 1965. “The Estimation of Fitnesses from Genotypic Frequencies.” Evolution 19(4): 546–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provine, W.B. 1989. Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N.A. and Nordborg, M. 2002. “Genealogical Trees, Coalescent Theory and the Analysis of Genetic Polymorphisms.” Nature Reviews Genetics 3(5): 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D.W. 2006. “H.B.D Kettlewell’s Research 1937–1953: The Influence of E.B. Ford, E.A. Cockayne and P.M. Sheppard.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28(3): 359–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E.B. 1964. Papers on Animal Population Genetics. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E.B. 1977. Genes in Populations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.R. 1967. “On Supergenes. I. The Evolution of Supergenes.” The American Naturalist 101(919): 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.R.G. 1971. “Wright’s Adaptive Surface, and Some General Rules for Equilibria in Complex Polymorphisms.” The American Naturalist 105(943): 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.R.G. 1972. “Selection and Stability in the Complex Polymorphism of Moraba scurra.” Evolution 26(3): 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. 1958. “The Comparison of Observed and Calculated Zygotic Distributions.” Evolution 12(1): 113–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. 1968. Topics in Population Genetics. New York:WWW Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J.D. 1945. Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J.D. 1956. “Adaptive Chromosomal Polymorphism in an Australian Grasshopper.” Evolution 10(3): 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J.D. 1957. “Cytogenetics of the Grasshopper Moraba scurra. 2. Heterotic Systems and Their Interaction.” Australian Journal of Zoology 5(3): 305–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J.D. 1968. “Models of Speciation.” Science 159(3819): 1065–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J.D. 1978. Modes of speciation. San Francisco: WH Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J.D. and Andrew, L.E. 1960. “Cytogenetics of the Grasshopper Moraba scurra. V. Biometric Effects of Chromosomal Inversions.” Evolution 14(3): 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J.D., Lewontin, R.C., and Andrew, L.E. 1963. “Cytogenetics of the Grasshopper Moraba scurra. VII. Geographic Variation of Adaptive Properties of Inversions.” Evolution 17(2): 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. Bright Jr. 1952. An Introduction to Scientific Research. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1932. “The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution.” D.F. Jones (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, Vol. 1(6). Monisha, WI: Brooklyn Botanic Garden, pp. 356–366.

  • Wright, S. 1949. “Adaptation and Selection.” G.L. Jepsen, E. Mayr, and G.G. Simpson (eds.), Genetics, Paleontology, and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 365–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: A Treatise in Four Volumes, Vol. 4. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio LEFHBIO, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Barâo do Geremoabo 147, Campus de Ondina, Ondina, Salvador, BA, 40170-290, Brazil

    Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl

Authors
  1. Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grodwohl, JB. Natural Selection, Adaptive Topographies and the Problem of Statistical Inference: The Moraba scurra Controversy Under the Microscope. J Hist Biol 50, 753–796 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9448-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9448-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation