Skip to main content
Log in

Practical Guidance for Charting Ethics Consultations

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally accepted that appropriate documentation of activities and recommendations of ethics consultants in patients’ medical records is critical. Despite this acceptance, the bioethics literature is largely devoid of guidance on key elements of an ethics chart note, the degree of specificity that it should contain, and its stylistic tenor. We aim to provide guidance for a variety of persons engaged in clinical ethics consultation: new and seasoned ethics committee members who are new to ethics consultation, students and trainees in clinical ethics, and those who have significant experience with ethics consultation so that they can reflect on their practice. Toward the goal of promoting quality charting practices in ethics consultations, we propose recommendations on a broad array of questions concerning clinical ethics consultation chart notes, including whether and when to write a chart note, and practical considerations for the tenor, purpose, and content of a chart note. Our broader aim is to promote discussion about good charting practices in clinical ethics, with the hope of contributing to clear standards of excellence in clinical ethics consultation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Professional Chaplains. (2009). Standards of practice for professional chaplains in acute care settings. http://www.professionalchaplains.org/index.aspx?id=1210.

  • Aulisio, M. P., Arnold, R. M., & Youngner, S. J. (2000). Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the society for health and human values-society for bioethics consultation task force on standards for bioethics consultation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramstedt, K. A., Andereck, W. S., McGaughey, J. W., & Neidich, A. B. (2009). Optimising the documentation practices of an ethics consultation service. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(1), 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. R., Smith, M. L., Hizlan, S., & Sharp, R. R. (2011). A systematic review of activities at a high-volume ethics consultation service. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 22(2), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, B., Schachter, M., Vincent, C., & Barber, N. (2002). Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: A prospective study. Lancet, 359(9315), 1373–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Report to congress: National strategy for quality improvement in health care. http://www.healthcare.gov/law/resources/reports/quality03212011a.html.

  • Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (1997). Evaluation and management guide. http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/eval_mgmt_serv_guide-ICN006764.pdf.

  • Dubler, N. N., Webber, M. P., & Swiderski, D. M. (2009). Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. The Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, B., Weijer, C., & Bereza, E. (1993). Case notes and charting of bioethical case consultations. HEC Forum, 5(3), 176–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagle, J. (1991). Social work records. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewy, R. S., & Loewy, E. H. (2007). Healthcare and the hospital chaplain. Medscape General Medicine, 9(1), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. H., Bruflat, C. M., & American Nurses Association. (2010). ANA’s principles for nursing documentation: Guidance for registered nurses. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.

  • National Association of Social Workers. (2005). NASW standards for social work practice in health care settings. http://www.naswdc.org/practice/default.asp.

  • Orr, R., & Shelton, W. (2009). A process and format for clinical ethics consultation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 20(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. C., Manzi, S. F., Volpe, D., & Stack, A. M. (2006). Getting the data right: Information accuracy in pediatric emergency medicine. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(4), 296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reamer, F. G. (2005). Documentation in social work: Evolving ethical and risk-management standards. Social Work, 50(4), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, R. A. (1996). ‘Leaving footprints’: The practice and benefits of hospital chaplains documenting pastoral care activity in patients’ medical records. Journal of Pastoral Care, 50(4), 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeel, J. D., & Self, D. J. (1989). An analysis of ethics consultation in the clinical setting. Theoretical Medicine, 10(4), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (2009). A possible solution, but not the last word. The Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., Sharp, R. R., Weise, K., & Kodish, E. (2010). Toward competency-based certification of clinical ethics consultants: A four-step process. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 21(1), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spike, J. P. (2009). Resolving the vexing question of credentialing: Finding the Aristotelian mean. HEC Forum, 21(3), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiderski, D. M., Ettinger, K. M., Webber, M. P., & Dubler, N. N. (2009). The Clinical Ethics Credentialing Project: Preliminary notes from a pilot project to establish quality measures for ethics consultation. HEC Forum, 22(1), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The National Association of Catholic Chaplains. (2012). Standard 3: Charting can allow meaningful stories to shape patient care. http://www.nacc.org/vision/May_June_2012/STD3-Mather.asp.

  • Warren, A., & Tart, R. C. (2008). Fatigue and charting errors: The benefit of a reduced call schedule. AORN Journal, 88(1), 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (1988). Charting and pastoral care. Care Giver: Journal of the College of Chaplains., 5, 115–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtenay R. Bruce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruce, C.R., Smith, M.L., Tawose, O.M. et al. Practical Guidance for Charting Ethics Consultations. HEC Forum 26, 79–93 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-013-9228-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-013-9228-y

Keywords

Navigation