Abstract
It is generally accepted that appropriate documentation of activities and recommendations of ethics consultants in patients’ medical records is critical. Despite this acceptance, the bioethics literature is largely devoid of guidance on key elements of an ethics chart note, the degree of specificity that it should contain, and its stylistic tenor. We aim to provide guidance for a variety of persons engaged in clinical ethics consultation: new and seasoned ethics committee members who are new to ethics consultation, students and trainees in clinical ethics, and those who have significant experience with ethics consultation so that they can reflect on their practice. Toward the goal of promoting quality charting practices in ethics consultations, we propose recommendations on a broad array of questions concerning clinical ethics consultation chart notes, including whether and when to write a chart note, and practical considerations for the tenor, purpose, and content of a chart note. Our broader aim is to promote discussion about good charting practices in clinical ethics, with the hope of contributing to clear standards of excellence in clinical ethics consultation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.
Association of Professional Chaplains. (2009). Standards of practice for professional chaplains in acute care settings. http://www.professionalchaplains.org/index.aspx?id=1210.
Aulisio, M. P., Arnold, R. M., & Youngner, S. J. (2000). Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the society for health and human values-society for bioethics consultation task force on standards for bioethics consultation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133(1), 59–69.
Bramstedt, K. A., Andereck, W. S., McGaughey, J. W., & Neidich, A. B. (2009). Optimising the documentation practices of an ethics consultation service. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(1), 47–50.
Bruce, C. R., Smith, M. L., Hizlan, S., & Sharp, R. R. (2011). A systematic review of activities at a high-volume ethics consultation service. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 22(2), 151–164.
Dean, B., Schachter, M., Vincent, C., & Barber, N. (2002). Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: A prospective study. Lancet, 359(9315), 1373–1378.
Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Report to congress: National strategy for quality improvement in health care. http://www.healthcare.gov/law/resources/reports/quality03212011a.html.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (1997). Evaluation and management guide. http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/eval_mgmt_serv_guide-ICN006764.pdf.
Dubler, N. N., Webber, M. P., & Swiderski, D. M. (2009). Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. The Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 23–33.
Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 13–25.
Freedman, B., Weijer, C., & Bereza, E. (1993). Case notes and charting of bioethical case consultations. HEC Forum, 5(3), 176–195.
Kagle, J. (1991). Social work records. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Loewy, R. S., & Loewy, E. H. (2007). Healthcare and the hospital chaplain. Medscape General Medicine, 9(1), 53.
Matthews, J. H., Bruflat, C. M., & American Nurses Association. (2010). ANA’s principles for nursing documentation: Guidance for registered nurses. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.
National Association of Social Workers. (2005). NASW standards for social work practice in health care settings. http://www.naswdc.org/practice/default.asp.
Orr, R., & Shelton, W. (2009). A process and format for clinical ethics consultation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 20(1), 1–11.
Porter, S. C., Manzi, S. F., Volpe, D., & Stack, A. M. (2006). Getting the data right: Information accuracy in pediatric emergency medicine. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(4), 296–301.
Reamer, F. G. (2005). Documentation in social work: Evolving ethical and risk-management standards. Social Work, 50(4), 325–334.
Ruff, R. A. (1996). ‘Leaving footprints’: The practice and benefits of hospital chaplains documenting pastoral care activity in patients’ medical records. Journal of Pastoral Care, 50(4), 383–391.
Skeel, J. D., & Self, D. J. (1989). An analysis of ethics consultation in the clinical setting. Theoretical Medicine, 10(4), 289–299.
Smith, M. L. (2009). A possible solution, but not the last word. The Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 3.
Smith, M. L., Sharp, R. R., Weise, K., & Kodish, E. (2010). Toward competency-based certification of clinical ethics consultants: A four-step process. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 21(1), 14–22.
Spike, J. P. (2009). Resolving the vexing question of credentialing: Finding the Aristotelian mean. HEC Forum, 21(3), 263–273.
Swiderski, D. M., Ettinger, K. M., Webber, M. P., & Dubler, N. N. (2009). The Clinical Ethics Credentialing Project: Preliminary notes from a pilot project to establish quality measures for ethics consultation. HEC Forum, 22(1), 65–72.
The National Association of Catholic Chaplains. (2012). Standard 3: Charting can allow meaningful stories to shape patient care. http://www.nacc.org/vision/May_June_2012/STD3-Mather.asp.
Warren, A., & Tart, R. C. (2008). Fatigue and charting errors: The benefit of a reduced call schedule. AORN Journal, 88(1), 88–95.
Williams, A. (1988). Charting and pastoral care. Care Giver: Journal of the College of Chaplains., 5, 115–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruce, C.R., Smith, M.L., Tawose, O.M. et al. Practical Guidance for Charting Ethics Consultations. HEC Forum 26, 79–93 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-013-9228-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-013-9228-y