Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘Cartesianism’ Redux or Situated Knowledges

  • Reply
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postphenomenology, in a complementary role with other science studies disciplines, remains within the trajectory of those theories which reject early modern epistemology and metaphysics, including rejection of ‘subject’–‘object’ distinctions, and holds, instead, to an inter-relational, co-constitutive ontology. Here the critiques which sometimes echo vestiges of such early modern epistemology are counter-challenged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Friis, J. K. B. O. (2011). Perception: Embodiment and beyond. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9242-y.

  • Ihde, D. (2011). Strecthing the in-between: Embodiment and beyond. Foundations of Science, 16(2–3), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, F. (2011). Scientific objectivity and postphenomenological perception. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9241-z.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA

    Don Ihde

Authors
  1. Don Ihde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don Ihde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ihde, D. ‘Cartesianism’ Redux or Situated Knowledges. Found Sci 17, 369–372 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9243-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9243-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation