Skip to main content
Log in

Epidemiology of cleft palate alone and cleft palate with accompanying defects

  • Birth Defects
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The epidemiology of cleft palate with multiple defects is often thought to be different from that of cleft palate alone, but there are few empirical data on this question. We explored this in a population-based data set created by combining data from two sources: the 1.8 million live births recorded from 1967 to 1998 in the Norwegian Birth Registry, and the two Norwegian surgical centers that repair cleft palate. Accompanying defects were identified from either source. Stratified analysis and logistic regression were used to assess relative risks by covariates. Of 1,431 babies with cleft palate, 31 % had another birth defect recorded by one or both sources. Prevalence of isolated cleft palate was steady over time, while cleft palate with other defects increased substantially. Girls had a higher risk of isolated cleft palate (relative risk 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–1.6) but not of cleft palate accompanied by other defects (1.1; 0.88–1.3). Older parents and parents who were first cousins had no increased risk of isolated cleft palate, but were twice as likely as others to have a baby with cleft palate accompanied by other defects. Risk factors differ between cases of cleft palate with and without accompanying defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CP:

Cleft palate

ICD:

International classification of diseases

RR:

Relative risk

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Christensen K. The 20th century Danish facial cleft population––epidemiological and genetic-epidemiological studies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:96–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jakobsen LP, Molsted K, Christensen K. Occurrence of cleft lip and palate in the Faroe Islands and Greenland from 1950 to 1999. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003;40:426–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kallen B, Harris J, Robert E. The epidemiology of orofacial clefts. 2. Associated malformations. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1996;16:242–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Magdalenic-Mestrovic M, Bagatin M. An epidemiological study of orofacial clefts in Croatia 1988–1998. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005;33:85–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Milerad J, Larson O, Ph DD, Hagberg C, Ideberg M. Associated malformations in infants with cleft lip and palate: a prospective, population-based study. Pediatrics 1997;100:180–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Natsume N, Niimi T, Furukawa H, Kawai T, Ogi N, Suzuki Y, Kawai T. Survey of congenital anomalies associated with cleft lip and/or palate in 701,181 Japanese people. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:157–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Forrester MB, Merz RD. Descriptive epidemiology of oral clefts in a multiethnic population, Hawaii, 1986–2000. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:622–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Yang W, Harris JA, Lammer EJ. Congenital malformations in births with orofacial clefts among 3.6 million California births, 1983–1997. Am J Med Genet A 2004;125:250–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP. Associated malformations in cases with oral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000;37:41–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tolarova MM, Cervenka J. Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet 1998;75:126–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell LE, Beaty TH, Lidral AC, Munger RG, Murray JC, Saal HM, Wyszynski DF. International Consortium for Oral Clefts G Guidelines for the design and analysis of studies on non-syndromic cleft lip and cleft palate in humans: summary report from a Workshop of the International Consortium for Oral Clefts Genetics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:93–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wyszynski DF, Sarkozi A, Czeizel AE. Oral clefts with associated anomalies: methodological issues. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006;43:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Das SK, Runnels RS Jr, Smith JC, Cohly HH. Epidemiology of cleft lip and cleft palate in Mississippi. South Med J 1995;88:437–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. James WH. Are oral clefts a consequence of maternal hormone imbalance? evidence from the sex ratios of sibs of probands. Teratology 2000;62:342–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowry RB, Thunem NY, Uh SH. Birth prevalence of cleft lip and palate in British Columbia between 1952 and 1986: stability of rates. CMAJ 1989;140:1167–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Menegotto BG, Salzano FM. Epidemiology of oral clefts in a large South American sample. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:373–6 (discussion 376–377)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen K. Methodological issues in epidemiological studies of oral clefts. In: Wyszynski DF, (editor). Cleft lip & Palate. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 101–7

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stanier P, Moore GE. Genetics of cleft lip and palate: syndromic genes contribute to the incidence of non-syndromic clefts. Hum Mol Genet 2004;13(Spec No 1):R73–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vieira AR, Orioli IM. Birth order and oral clefts: a meta analysis. Teratology 2002;66:209–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayetta RB, Weinrich MC, Coston GN. Incidence and prevalence of cleft lip and palate: what we think we know. Cleft Palate Journal 1989;26:242–7 (discussion 247–248)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bixler D. Commentary. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:376–7

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lie RT, Heuch I, Irgens LM. Maximum likelihood estimation of the proportion of congenital malformations using double registration systems. Biometrics 1994;50:433–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Czeizel A, Tusnadi G. An epidemiologic study of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and posterior cleft palate in Hungary. Human Hered 1971;21:17–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. DeRoo LA, Gaudino JA, Edmonds LD. Orofacial cleft malformations: associations with maternal and infant characteristics in Washington State. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2003;67:637–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyszynski DF, Sarkozi A, Vargha P, Czeizel AE. Birth weight and gestational age of newborns with cleft lip with or without cleft palate and with isolated cleft palate. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;27:185–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Christensen K, Holm NV, Olsen J, Kock K, Fogh-Andersen P. Selection bias in genetic-epidemiological studies of cleft lip and palate. Am J Hum Genet 1992;51:654–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

At the time of this research, Emily Harville was a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Predoctoral Fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily W. Harville.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harville, E.W., Wilcox, A.J., Lie, R.T. et al. Epidemiology of cleft palate alone and cleft palate with accompanying defects. Eur J Epidemiol 22, 389–395 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-007-9129-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-007-9129-y

Keywords

Navigation