Skip to main content
Log in

Production networks in China and India: a comparative analysis

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we examine and compare the two important production hubs in Asia: China and Greater China and India and South Asia. We show that in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, manufacturing trade has continued to be highly relevant, with trade in parts and components growing in importance. In contrast, in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, trade in parts and components remain limited. We then calculate various revealed comparative advantage (RCA) indices, which China having more components with RCA values exceeding one. Some of the most important components exported by China include electronic parts and telecommunication parts. One explanation is to why India is relatively weak in parts and components trade is that India is strong in service trade. Other reasons may be related to better port infrastructure, higher research and development intensity and higher educational enrollments in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to the World FactBook, the land area of China is 9,596,901 sq km; India is 2,973,193 sq km.

References

  • Aminian N, Fung KC, Ng F (2009) A comparative analysis of trade and economic integration in East Asia and Latin America. Econ Change Restruct 42(1):105–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antras P (2003) Firms, contracts, and trade structure. Q J Econ 118:1375–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antras P (2005) Incomplete contracts and the product cycle. Am Econ Rev 95(4):1054–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antras P, Helpman E (2004) Global sourcing. J Political Econ 112(3):552–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt S, Kierzkowski H (eds) (2001) Fragmentation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Athukorala P-C (2011) Production networks and trade patterns in East Asia: regionalization or globalization? Asian Econ Pap 10(1):65–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder A (2009) Offshoring: big deal, or business as usual? In: Bhagwati J, Blinder A (eds) Offshoring of American jobs: what response from U.S. economic policy?. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Cheng L, Fung KC, Lau LJ (2009) The estimation of domestic value-added and employment induced by exports: an application to Chinese exports to the United States. In: Cheung Y-W, Wong K-Y (eds) China and Asia: economic and financial interactions. Routledge Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Kierzkowski H (eds) (2001) Global production and trade in East Asia. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean J, Fung KC, Wang Z (2007) Measuring the vertical specialization in chinese trade, Office of economics working paper no. 2007-01-A, U.S. International Trade Commission, The United States Government, Washington

  • Deardorff A (2001) Fragmentation across cones. In: Arndt S, Kierzkowski H (eds) Fragmentation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra R, Hanson G (2005) Ownership and control in outsourcing to china: estimating the property-rights theory of the firm. Q J Econ 10:729–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Helpman E (2005) Outsourcing in a global economy. Rev Econ Stud 72(1):135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K-M (2001) The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. J Int Econ 54:75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Kierzkowski H (2001) A framework for fragmentation. In: Arndt S, Kierzkowski H (eds) Fragmentation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura F, Obashi A (2011) Production networks in East Asia: what we know so far. ADBI working paper 320, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo

  • Naughton B (2007) The Chinese economy: transitions and growth. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng F, Kaminski B (2005) Production disintegration and integration of central europe into global markets. Int Rev Econ Finance 14(3):377–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng F, Yeats A (2001) Production sharing in East Asia: who does what for whom and why? In: Cheng L, Kierzkowski H (eds) Global production and trade in East Asia. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng F, Yeats A (2003) Major trade trends in East Asia: what are their implications for regional cooperation and growth? World Bank policy research paper no. 3084, June

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2011) Economic survey: India. Paris, France

  • Panagariya A (2008) India: the emerging giant. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer B (2005) International outsourcing and incomplete contracts, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia

  • WTO (World Trade Organization) (2011) World trade developments. Switzerland, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi K-M (2003) Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade? J Political Econ 111(1):52–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. C. Fung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fung, K.C., Hwang, HC., Ng, F. et al. Production networks in China and India: a comparative analysis. Econ Change Restruct 46, 45–69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-012-9133-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-012-9133-4

Keywords

Navigation