Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bleeding Lesions Within Reach of Conventional Endoscopy in Capsule Endoscopy Examinations for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Is Repeating Endoscopy Economically Feasible?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Most tertiary gastroenterology centers currently offer an open-access capsule endoscopy (CE) service, including patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. However, CE may identify lesions missed by conventional endoscopy.

Aims

To determine the incidence of bleeding lesions missed by the preceding gastroscopy/colonoscopy that were revealed by CE and compare potential differences in the rate of identifying such lesions in patients that we investigated as opposed to those investigated elsewhere.

Methods

We prospectively reviewed data from patients subjected to CE for obscure bleeding. We analyzed all cases where a source of bleeding was located in the stomach, duodenum, or colon.

Results

A total of 317 consecutive patients were subjected to CE for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding within 28 months. Prior to CE examination, 174 patients had gastroscopy and colonoscopy in our institutions and 143 were referrals, all with negative endoscopic investigation. We identified 11 (3.5%) cases where the source of bleeding was found in the stomach (n = 4) or the cecum (n = 7). There was a significant difference of extra small intestinal lesions diagnosed by CE between referrals (9/143, 6.3%) and endoscopic investigation performed in our institutions (2/174, 1.15%), (p = 0.026). The estimated cost of re-endoscoping in our institution all CE referrals would be €50,050 (143 patients × €350), to avoid unnecessary CE examinations (9 patients × €600 = €5,400).

Conclusions

Reading the whole CE video is important, because small-bowel CE may identify lesions responsible for obscure bleeding missed by the preceding gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Repeating conventional endoscopy by experts before CE is not a cost-effective approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raju GS, Gerson L, Das A, Lewis B. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) technical review on obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1697–1717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leighton JA, Golstein J, Hirota W, et al. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:650–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin S, Rockey D. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2005;34:679–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E, et al. Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: Report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:643–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, et al. A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:999–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Leusse A, Vahedi K, Edery J, et al. Capsule endoscopy or push enteroscopy for first-line exploration of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding? Gastroenterology. 2007;132:855–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Voderholzer W, Beinhoelzl J, Rogalla P, et al. Diagnostic yield of wireless capsule enteroscopy in comparison with computed tomography enteroclysis. Endoscopy. 2003;35:1009–1014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukumoto A, Tanaka S, Shishido T, et al. Comparison of detectability of small-bowel lesions between capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy for patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:857–865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitiyakara T, Selby W. Non-small bowel lesions detected by capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:234–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elijah D, Daas A, Brady P. Capsule endoscopy for obscure GI bleeding yields a high incidence of significant treatable lesions within reach of standard upper endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:962–963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Viazis N, Sgouros S, Papaxoinis K, et al. Bowel preparation increases the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:534–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rokkas T, Papaxoinis K, Triantafyllou K, Pistiolas D, Ladas SD. Does purgative preparation influence the diagnostic yield of small bowel video capsule endoscopy? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:219–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Viazis N, Papaxoinis K, Theodoropoulos I, et al. Impact of capsule endoscopy in obscure small-bowel bleeding: Defining strict diagnostic criteria for a favorable outcome. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:717–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rey JF, Ladas S, Alhassani A. Kuznetsov K and the ESGE Guidelines Committee. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Video capsule endoscopy: Update to guidelines. Endoscopy. 2006;38:1047–1053.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartmann D, Schmidt H, Schilling D, et al. Follow-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy and intraoperative enteroscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:780–783.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saperas E, Dot J, Videla J, Alvarez-Castells A, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus computed tomographic or standard angiography for the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:731–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heine GD, Hadithi M, Groenen MJ, Kuipers EJ, Jacobs MA, Mulder CJ. Double-balloon enteroscopy: Indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Endoscopy. 2006;38:42–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Estevez E, Gonzalez-Conde B, Vazquez-Iglesias JL, et al. Diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes after capsule endoscopy in 100 consecutive patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:881–888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carey EJ, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, et al. A single-center experience of 260 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buscaglia JM, Giday SA, Kantsevoy SV, et al. Performance characteristics of the suspected blood indicator feature in capsule endoscopy according to indication for study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:298–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D’Halluin PN, Delvaux M, Lapalus MG, et al. Does the “Suspected Blood Indicator” improve the detection of bleeding lesions by capsule endoscopy? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:243–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilbert D, O’Malley S, Selby W. Are repeat upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy necessary within six months of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1806–1809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hepatogastroenterology Unit, First Department of Medicine, Propaedeutic, Medical School, Athens University, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, 17 Agiou Thoma Street, 11527, Athens, Greece

    Jiannis Vlachogiannakos, Kostis Papaxoinis, Ioannis Binas & Spiros D. Ladas

  2. Second Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece

    Nikos Viazis, Anastasia Kegioglou & Dimitrios Karamanolis

Authors
  1. Jiannis Vlachogiannakos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kostis Papaxoinis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nikos Viazis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anastasia Kegioglou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ioannis Binas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dimitrios Karamanolis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Spiros D. Ladas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiannis Vlachogiannakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlachogiannakos, J., Papaxoinis, K., Viazis, N. et al. Bleeding Lesions Within Reach of Conventional Endoscopy in Capsule Endoscopy Examinations for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Is Repeating Endoscopy Economically Feasible?. Dig Dis Sci 56, 1763–1768 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1592-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1592-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation