Abstract
The Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) model predicts that dysfunctional metacognitions are fundamental to the development and maintenance of emotional disorder, as they contribute to a perseverative style of processing: the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS). The aim of this study was to test the relationship between dysfunctional metacognitions and attentional bias (a component of the CAS), in the context of health anxiety. 158 undergraduate students read information on health risks as part of a health anxiety induction before completing an emotional Stroop task, and a number of questionnaires. Although the health anxiety induction may not have been successful, health-specific metacognitions were associated with attentional bias for health-related words, positive words, and also a greater bias for positive words when they were related to health (rather than general). Only one dimension of general metacognitions (“negative beliefs about worry, concerning uncontrollability and danger”) was associated with attentional bias. Findings are discussed in relation to the predictions of the S-REF model, and directions for future research are outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Amir, N., Beard, C., Burns, M., & Bomyea, J. (2009). Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder [special section]. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(1), 28–33.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24.
Bouman, T. K., & Meijer, K. J. (1999). A preliminary study of worry and metacognitions in hypochondriasis. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 96–101.
Buwalda, F. M., Bouman, T. K., & Van Duijn, M. A. (2008). The effect of a psychoeducational course on hypochondriacal metacognition. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(5), 689–701.
Fisher, P., & Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy: Distinctive features. Hove: Routledge.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Genov, A., Shay, I., & Boone, R. T. (2002). Genov modified Stroop task (GMST) [Computer software and manual]. Available at http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~booner/GMSTsite/index.htm.
Gerdes, T. T., Noyes, R., Kathol, R. G., Phillips, B. M., Fisher, M. M., Morcuende, M. A., et al. (1996). Physician recognition of hypochondriacal patients. General Hospital Psychiatry, 18(2), 106–112.
Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239.
Longley, S. L., Broman-Fulks, J. J., Calamari, J. E., Noyes, R., Wade, M., & Orlando, C. M. (2010). A taxometric study of hypochondriasis symptoms. Behavior Therapy, 41(4), 505–514.
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation Monograph.
Papageorgiou, C., & Wells, A. (1998). Effects of attention training on hypochondriasis: A brief case series. Psychological Medicine, 28(01), 193–200.
Pilowsky, I. (1967). Dimensions of hypochondriasis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 89–93.
Rees, C. S., & van Koesveld, K. E. (2008). An open trial of group metacognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39(4), 451–458.
Spada, M. M., Georgiou, G. A., & Wells, A. (2010). The relationship among metacognitions, attentional control, and state anxiety. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(1), 64–71.
Speckens, A. E. (2001). Assessment of hypochondriasis. In V. Starcevic & D. R. Lipsitt (Eds.), Hypochondriasis: Modern perspectives on an ancient malady (pp. 61–88). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy: Cognition applied to regulating cognition. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36(6), 651–658.
Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York: Guilford Press.
Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(4), 385–396.
Wells, A., Fisher, P., Myers, S., Wheatley, J., Patel, T., & Brewin, C. R. (2009). Metacognitive therapy in recurrent and persistent depression: A multiple-baseline study of a new treatment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33(3), 291–300.
Wells, A., & Hackmann, A. (1993). Imagery and core beliefs in health anxiety: Contents and origins. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 21(3), 265–273.
Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The S-REF model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 881–888.
Wells, A., Welford, M., Fraser, J., King, P., Mendel, E., Wisely, J., et al. (2008). Chronic PTSD treated with metacognitive therapy: An open trial. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 15(1), 85–92.
Wells, A., Welford, M., King, P., Papageorgiou, C., Wisely, J., & Mendel, E. (2010). A pilot randomized trial of metacognitive therapy vs applied relaxation in the treatment of adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(5), 429–434.
Williams, J., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 3–24.
Acknowledgments
The technical assistance of Nenad Petkovski, and the statistical guidance of Margaret Charles are gratefully acknowledged. Thank you also to Theo Bouman for providing access to the MCHA questionnaire.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaur, A., Butow, P. & Thewes, B. Do Metacognitions Predict Attentional Bias in Health Anxiety?. Cogn Ther Res 35, 575–580 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9387-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9387-6