Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three deeply divided lineages of the freshwater mussel genus Anodonta in western North America

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surprising diversity and recent dramatic decline of freshwater mussels in North America have been well documented, although inventory efforts to date have been concentrated in the eastern United States. Unlike their eastern counterparts, western freshwater mussels have received comparatively little attention. The accurate identity of western lineages is a necessary component for future inventory, monitoring, and ecological work involving these taxa. Here we initiate a study involving the most speciose genus (Anodonta) in western North America, incorporating information about type localities and type specimen morphology and describing the discovery of three highly divergent lineages among four western Anodonta species. In a limited phylogenetic analysis, we find (1) that A. californiensis/nuttalliana and A.oregonensis/kennerlyi are distinct, highly divergent clades, and (2) that A. beringiana is more closely allied with A. woodiana, an Asian species, than either of the other two western North American clades. We were largely unable to resolve the placement of these three clades with respect to other anodontines, and suggest the need for a broader phylogenetic framework. We recommend, however, that the existence of these three deeply divergent groups be considered in the development of regional monitoring, conservation and research plans despite the taxonomic uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Bogan AE (1993) Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: Unionoida): a search for causes. Am Zool 33:599–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch JB (1973) Freshwater unionacean clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America. Biota of Freshwater Ecosystems Identification Manual No. 11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • Call RE (1884) On the quaternary and recent Mollusca of the Great Basin, with descriptions of new forms. Bull US Geol Surv 11:358–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DC, Serb JM, Buhay JE, Roe KJ, Minton RL, Lydeard C (2005) Phylogeny of North American amblemines (Bivalvia, Unionoida): prodigious polyphyly proves pervasive across genera. Invertebr Biol 124:131–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter PP (1856) Monograph of the shells collected by T. Null, Esq., on the California coast, in the years 1834–5. Proc Zool Soc Lond 24:209–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W et al (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J (1929) Non-marine Mollusca of Oregon and Washington. Univ of Colorado Studies 17:47–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeh WR (1990) Phylogenetic relationships among eastern North American Anodonta (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacol Rev 23:68–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kat PW (1983) Genetic and morphological divergence among nominal species of North America Anodonta (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacologia 23:361–374

    Google Scholar 

  • King TL, Eackles MS, Gjetvaj B, Hoeh WR (1999) Intraspecific phylogeography of Lasmigona subviridis (Bivalvia: Unionidae): conservation implications of range discontinuity. Mol Ecol 8:S65–S78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lea I (1838) Description of new freshwater and land shells. Trans Am Philosoph Soc 6(N. S.):1–154 + plates i-xxiv

  • Lea I (1852) Descriptions of new species of the family Unionidae. Trans Am Philosoph Soc 10(N. S.):253–294 + plates 12–19

  • Lea I (1860) Descriptions of seven new species of Unionidae from the United States. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 12:306–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (1875) Description of a new species of Anodonta. Field and Forest 1:26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Mayden RL (1995) A diverse and endangered aquatic ecosystem of the southeast United States. Conserv Biol 9:800–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Holznagel WE, Glaubrecht M, Ponder WF (2002) Molecular phylogeny and evidence for multiple origins of freshwater gastropods of the circum-global, diverse superfamily Cerithioidea (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda). Mol Phylogenet Evol 22:399–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Lindberg DR (2003) Challenges and research opportunities in molluscan molecular phylogenetics. In: Lydeard C, Lindberg DR (eds) Molecular systematics and phylogeography of mollusks. Smithsonian Books, Washington, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF et al (2004) The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. Bioscience 54:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Master LL, Stein BA, Kutnere LS, Hammerson GA (2000) Vanishing assets: conservation status of US species. In: Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (eds) Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 93–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Middendorff AT (1851) Bescreibung einiger neuer Mollusken-Arten, nebst einem Blicke auf den geographischen Charkter der Land- und Süsswasser-Mollusken Nord-Asiens. Bull Classe Physico-Math Acad Imp Sci St-Petersb 9:108–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton RL, Lydeard C (2003) Phylogeny, taxonomy, genetics and global heritage ranks of an imperiled, freshwater snail genus Lithasia (Pleuroceridae). Mol Ecol 12:75–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mock KE, Brim Box JC, Miller MP et al (2004) Genetic diversity and divergence among freshwater mussel (Anodonta) populations in the Bonneville basin of Utah. Mol Ecol 13:1085–1098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullenbach R, Lagoda PL, Welter C (1989) An efficient salt-chloroform extraction of DNA from blood and tissues. Trends Genet 5:391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and pylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves RJ, Bogan AE, Williams JD et al (1997) Status of aquatic mollusks in the southeastern United States: a downward spiral of diversity. In: Benz GW, Collins DE (eds) Aquatic fauna in peril: the southeastern perspective, March-April 1994. Special Publication 1, Southeast Aquatic Research Institute, Lenz Design and Communications, Decatur, GA., pp 43–85

  • Simpson CT (1914) A descriptive catalogue of the naiades, or pearly freshwater mussels. Bryan Walker, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansbery DH (1971) Rare and endangered fresh-water mollusks in eastern United States. In: Jorgensen ES, Sharp RW (eds) Proceedings of a Symposium on Rare and Endangered Mollusks (Naiads) of the United States. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, U.S. Department of the Interior, Twin Cities, Minnesota, pp 1–18f + 50 plates

  • Turgeon DD, Quinn JE Jr., Bogan AE et al (1998) Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: mollusks, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 26:ix-526

  • Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M et al (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nuclei Acids Res 23:4407–4414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JD, Mulvey M (1997) Recognition of freshwater mussel taxa: a conservation challenge. In: Meffe GK, Carroll CR (eds) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 64–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanatta DT, Ngo A, Lindell J (2007) Reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships among Anodonta, Pyganodon, and Utterbackia (Bivalvia: Unionioda) using mutation coding of allozyme data. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 156:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ken P. Currens, David Close, and Gary James for their efforts in establishing the freshwater mussel research program of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR). We also acknowledge the field assistance provided by Donna Nez (CTUIR) and Steven C. Smith (University of Alaska at Anchorage) as well as advice and comments provided by Art Bogan, North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, and Randy Hoeh, Kent State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen E. Mock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chong, J.P., Brim Box, J.C., Howard, J.K. et al. Three deeply divided lineages of the freshwater mussel genus Anodonta in western North America. Conserv Genet 9, 1303–1309 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9485-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9485-x

Keywords

Navigation