Abstract
Two family therapy training instruments, the Family Concept Assessment (FCA) and Rating Scale and Family Therapy Assessment Exercise (FTE), developed in the United States were adapted to suit the Indian cultural context. Several changes were made to the instruments while at the same time maintaining the equivalency of the scales to the original. Both the instruments were tested for face validity by a panel of cultural and content experts in the United States. The FTE was then pilot tested with an Indian sample. The psychometric properties of the adapted instrument are reported in this article including feedback from the participants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. M. Avis D. H. Sprenkle (1990) ArticleTitleOutcome research on family therapy training: A substantive and methodological review Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 16 241–264
K. Bhui S. Mohamud N. Warfa T. Craig S. Stansfeld (2003) ArticleTitleCultural adaptation of mental health measures: Improving the quality of clinical practice and research British Journal of Psychiatry 183 184–186 Occurrence Handle10.1192/bjp.183.3.184 Occurrence Handle12948986
P. Bolton (2001) ArticleTitleCross cultural validity and reliability testing of a standard psychiatric assessment instrument without a gold standard Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders 189 238–242 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005053-200104000-00005
D. C. Breunlin R. C. Schwartz M. S. Krause L. M. Selby (1983) ArticleTitleEvaluating family therapy training: The development of an instrument Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 9 37–47
F. Dela Cruz G. Padilla E. Agustin (2000) ArticleTitleAdapting a measure of acculturation for cross-cultural research Journal of Transcultural Nursing 11 191–198 Occurrence Handle11982107
C. Falicov J. Constantine D. Bruenlin (1981) ArticleTitleTeaching family therapy: A program based on learning objectives Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 7 497–505
J. A. Flaherty F. M. Gaviria D. Pathak T. et al. Mitchell (1988) ArticleTitleDeveloping instruments for cross cultural psychiatric research Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 176 257–263
K. F. Geisinger (1994) ArticleTitleCross cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments Psychological Assessment 6 304–312 Occurrence Handle10.1037//1040-3590.6.4.304
Hernandez, K. (1985). The reliability and validity of two instruments to measure family therapy training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana
Natrajan, R. (2004). A systemic conceptualization workshop in Chennai, India: Training and evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana
E. Street (1988) ArticleTitleFamily therapy training research: System model and review Journal of Family Therapy 10 383–402 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j..1988.00325.x
B. Tabachnick L. Fidell (1996) Using multivariate statistics Harper Collins College Publishers New York
T. Tran K. Aroian (2000) ArticleTitleDeveloping cross-cultural research instruments Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation 1 35–48
S. Tucker W. Pinsof (1984) ArticleTitleThe empirical evaluation of structural family therapy training Family Process 23 437–456 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00437.x Occurrence Handle6479306
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Natrajan, R., Karuppaswamy, N., Thomas, V. et al. Adaptation of Two Family Therapy Training Instruments to Culturally Suit the Indian Context. Contemp Fam Ther 27, 415–434 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-005-6218-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-005-6218-5