References
Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR et al (2007) Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109:25–32
Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD et al (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer 109:1721–1728
Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI et al (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13:4429–4434
Tischkowitz M, Brunét JS, Bégin LR et al (2007) Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 7:134–144
Cleator S, Heller W, Coorbes (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol 8:235–244
Carey La, Dees EC, Sawyer L et al (2007) The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13:2329–2334
Tan DSP, Marchiò C, Jones RL et al (2007) Triple negative breast cancer: molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline-treated patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9756-8
Olaussen KA, Dunant A, Fouret P et al (2006) DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 355:983–991
Al-Haddad S, Zhang Z, Leygue E et al (1999) Psoriasin (S100A7) expression and invasive breast cancer. Am J Pathol 155:2057–2066
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sidoni, A., Cartaginese, F., Colozza, M. et al. ERCC1 expression in triple negative breast carcinoma: the paradox revisited. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111, 569–570 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9804-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9804-4