Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Murder on the development express: who killed nature/nurture?

Evelyn Fox Keller: The mirage of a space between nature and nurture. Duke University Press, 2010

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Keller explains the persistence of the nature/nurture debate by a chronic ambiguity in language derived from classical and behavioral genetics. She suggests that the more precise vocabulary of modern molecular genetics may be used to rephrase the underlying questions and hence provide a way out of this controversy. I show that her proposal fits into a long tradition in which other authors have wrestled with the same problem and come to similar conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundson R (2005) The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: roots of evo-devo. In: Ruse M (ed) Cambridge studies in philosophy and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannett L (1999) What’s the cause? The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanation. Biol Philos 14(3):349–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb G (1995) Some conceptual deficiencies in ‘developmental’ behavior genetics. Hum Dev 38:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb G (2003) On making behavioral genetics truly developmental. Hum Dev 45(6):337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE, Stotz K (2013) Genetics: a philosophical introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)

  • Griffiths PE, Tabery JG (2008) Behavioral genetics and development: historical and conceptual causes of controversy. New Ideas Psychol 26:332–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen W (1909) Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Gustav Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (2001) Battling the undead: how (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In: Singh R, Krimbas K, Paul D, Beatty J (eds) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical and political perspectives (Festchrifft for Richard Lewontin). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 396–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrman DS (1970) Semantic & conceptual issues in the nature-nurture problem. In: Lehrman DS (ed) Development & evolution of behaviour. WH Freeman and co., San Francisco, pp 17–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1982) Organism & environment. In: Plotkin H (ed) Learning, development, culture. Wiley, New York, pp 151–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (2000) The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Linquist S, Machery E, Griffiths PE, Stotz K (2011) Exploring the Folkbiological conception of human nature. Philos Trans R Soc B 366(1563):444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K (1957, 1937) The nature of instinct. In: Schiller CH (ed) Instinctive behavior: the development of a modern concept. International Universities Press, New York, pp 129–175. Original edition, Folia Biotheoretica 2

  • Mameli M, Bateson PPG (2006) Innateness and the sciences. Biol Philos 22:155–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meaney MJ (2001) Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Ann Rev Neurosci 24:1161–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meaney MJ, Szyf M (2005) Environmental programming of stress responses through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 7(2):103–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan TH (1926) The theory of the gene. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

  • Orr HA (2003) What's not in your genes. New York review of books, August 13

  • Oyama S (1985) The ontogeny of information: developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Oyama S (2001) Term in tension: what do you do when all the good words are taken? In: Oyama S, PE, Gray RD (eds) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama S (2002) The nurturing of natures. In: Grunwald A, Gutmann M, Neumann-Held EM (eds) On human nature: anthropological, biological and philosophical foundations. Springer, Berlin, pp 163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert JS (2001) Interpreting the homeobox: metaphors of gene action and activation in development and evolution. Evol Dev 3(4):287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneirla TC (1957) The concept of development in comparative psychology. In: Harris DB (ed) The concept of development. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 78–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KC (2000) What is a genetic trait? In: Magnus D, Butcher A (eds) Contemporary genetic technology: scientific, ethical, and social challenges. Krieger, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotz K (2006a) Molecular epigenesis: distributed specificity as a break in the central dogma. Hist Philos Life Sci 28(4):527–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotz K (2006b) With genes like that, who needs an environment? Postgenomics’ argument for the ontogeny of information. Philos Sci 73(5):905–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotz K (2008) The ingredients for a postgenomic synthesis of nature and nurture. Philos Psychol 21(3):359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotz K, Allen C (eds) (2008) Reconciling nature and nurture in the study of behavior. Philos Psychol, themed issue 21(3)

  • Tabery JG (2007) Biometric and developmental genotype-environment interactions: looking back, moving forward. Dev Psychopathol 19:961–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery JG (2008) R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the origin(s) of genotype-environment interaction. Rev J Hist Biol 41(4):717–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery JG (2009) Difference mechanisms: explaining variations with mechanisms. Biol Philos 24(5):711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer E (2000) Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9(5):160–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer E, Goldsmith HH, Gottesman II (1995) Commentary. Rev Hum Dev 38:142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1942) The epigenotype. Endeavour 1:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1952) The evolution of developmental systems. In: Herbert DA (ed) Proceedings of the twenty-eighth meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Association for the advancement of science. A. H. Tucker, Government Printer, Brisbane, pp 155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver ICG, Diorio J, Seckl JR, Szyf M, Meaney MJ (2004) Early environmental regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression: characterization of intracellular mediators and potential genomic target sites. Rev Ann NY Acad Sci 1024:182–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MJ, King AP (1987) Settling nature and nurture into an ontogenetic niche. Dev Psychobiol 20(5):549–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MJ, King AP (2008) Deconstructing innate illusions: reflections on nature-nurture-niche from an unlikely source. Philos Psychol 21(3):383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MJ, King AP, Arberg AA (1988) The inheritance of niches. In: Blass EM (ed) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is supported under Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP0878650).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Main Quadrangle A 14, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Karola Stotz

Authors
  1. Karola Stotz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karola Stotz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stotz, K. Murder on the development express: who killed nature/nurture?. Biol Philos 27, 919–929 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9343-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9343-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation