Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A latent threat to biodiversity: consequences of small-scale heterogeneity loss

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The threat of homogenisation to biodiversity is generally considered to occur at broad scales or in response to high-intensity impacts. Therefore, most biodiversity studies estimate local average or total species richness rather than local heterogeneity. Here we consider the potential for relative shifts between these different aspects of biodiversity at small spatial scales to be an early warning signal for biodiversity loss. In response to chronic, very low-level pollution, we observed a disjunctive response with gamma diversity (total species richness) and beta diversity (heterogeneity) decreasing while alpha diversity (average species richness) was still increasing. Homogenisation may, therefore, affect biodiversity through thresholds that alter the relationship between the average species richness and its heterogeneity, leading to the potential for regime shifts. Our stressor also had a strong negative effect on rare species, meaning that the purported importance of rare species as “insurance” in the face of environmental change may be overstated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2006) Rising variance: a leading indicator of ecological transition. Ecol Lett 9:308–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RT, Gorley RN (2006) Primer v6. PrimerE, Plymouth

  • Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS: biodiversity estimation. 8.0 ed. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateS

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organisation. Am Nat 111:1119–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, Veech JA, Gering JC, Summerville KS (2003) Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α, β, and γ diversity. Am Nat 162:734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denslow JS (1980) Pattern of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes. Oecologia 46:18–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornelas M, Connolly SR, Hughes TP (2006) Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 400:80–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen KE, Hewitt JE, Thrush SF (2007) Rare species, habitat diversity and functional redundancy in marine benthos. J Sea Res 58:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson MC, Solan M, Emes C et al (2001) Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems. Nature 411:73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gering JC, Crist TO, Veech JA (2003) Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 17:488–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS, Mirza FB (1979) A possible method for the detection of pollution-induced disturbances on marine benthic communities. Mar Pollut Bull 10:142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guégan J-F, Lek S, Oberdorff T (1998) Energy availability and habitat heterogeneity predict global riverine fish diversity. Nature 391:382–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker SD, Gaines SD (1997) Some implications of direct positive interactions for community species diversity. Ecology 78:1990–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt JE, Thrush SF, Halliday J, Duffy C (2005) The importance of small-scale biogenic habitat structure for maintaining beta diversity. Ecology 86:1618–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt JE, Anderson MJ, Hickey C, Kelly S et al. (2009) Enhancing the ecological significance of contamination guidelines through integration with community analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43:2118–2123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M (1979) A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am Nat 113:81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimek S, Marini L, Hofman M, Isselstein J (2008) Additive partitioning of plant diversity with respect to grassland management regime, fertilisation and abiotic factors. Basic Appl Ecol 9:626–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1996) Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, Brown VK (1993) Redundancy in ecosystems. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75:435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (2000) Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity. Ecol Lett 3:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P et al (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DD, Carr RS, Calder FD et al (1996) Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5:253–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S (2002) Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm. Ecology 83:1537–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Li S (1997) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED et al (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51:933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson TH, Rosenberg R (1978) Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 16:229–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 269:347–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A, Hector A (2000) Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405:212–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Lovette IJ (1999) The roles of island area per se and habitat diversity in the species-area relationships of four Lesser Antillean faunal groups. J Anim Ecol 68:1142–1160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C (2008) Computing additive diversity from presence-absence scores: a critique and alternative parameters. Theor Popul Biol 73:244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlacher TA, Newell P, Clavier J, Schlacher-Hoenlinger MA et al (1998) Soft-sediment benthic community structure in a coral reef lagoon—the prominence of spatial heterogeneity and “spot endemism”. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 174:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin PKS, Ellingsen KE (2004) Spatial patterns of soft-sediment benthic diversity in subtropical Hong Kong waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 276:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solan M, Cardinale BJ, Downing A, Engelhardt KAM et al (2004) Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science 306:1177–1180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF, Dayton PK (2002) Disturbance to marine benthic habitats by trawling and dredging—implications for marine biodiversity. ARES 33:449–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF, Gray JS, Hewitt JE, Ugland KI (2006) Predicting the effects of habitat homogenization on marine biodiversity. Ecol Appl 16:1636–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF, Coco G, Hewitt JE (2008a) Complex positive connections between functional groups are revealed by neural network analysis of ecological time-series. Am Nat 171:669–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Hickey CW, Kelly S (2008b) Multiple stressor effects identified from species abundance distributions: interactions between urban contaminants and species habitat relationships. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366:160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velland M, Verheyen K, Flinn KM et al (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species-environment relationships via agricultural land use. J Ecol 95:565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol 6:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and ecosystems, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the New Zealand Foundation for Science and Technology (C01X0504) for provided funding for this work. Thanks also to David Hawksworth, who as editor encouraged us to revise the paper, and to 2 anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 11-115, Hillcrest, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Judi Hewitt, Simon Thrush, Andrew Lohrer & Michael Townsend

Authors
  1. Judi Hewitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Thrush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Lohrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Townsend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judi Hewitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewitt, J., Thrush, S., Lohrer, A. et al. A latent threat to biodiversity: consequences of small-scale heterogeneity loss. Biodivers Conserv 19, 1315–1323 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9763-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9763-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation