Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of moose Alces alces L. in boreal forest – the effect on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) abundance and diversity

  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The indirect effect of moose Alces alces browsing on ground beetle's abundance and diversity was investigated by pitfall trapping in a mixed coniferous forest in Vestfold County (59°19′ N, 9°50′ E, Norway), during the summer of 2002. Three areas with different browsing pressures, ranging from non- to medium- and heavily browsed were chosen and dry weight of bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus and humidity at ground level were measured in the three locations. As predicted, the gradient analyses showed that browsing by moose influenced the composition of carabid fauna, and that browsing intensity and humidity covaried with the most important gradient in carabid species composition found across the three locations. Species that live in light stands with rather dry soil, were more often captured in the browsed areas, whereas shade tolerant and hygrophilous species were more abundant in the non-browsed area. The carabid abundance increased significantly with increasing browsing pressure. According to our predictions, the diversity at trap level (α-diversity) was higher in the highly browsed area. Conversely, species turnover (β-diversity) decreased with browsing intensity. On the other hand, the rarefaction analysis showed that the regional species richness (γ-diversity) was considerably higher in the medium browsed area than in the heavily browsed one, which is consistent with the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. This study indicates that moose, by reducing the bilberry that constitutes the field layer in summer, affect carabid species composition and might be capable to reshape the whole ecosystem in our study area by a cascade effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen J. (1995). A comparison of pitfall trapping and quadrat sampling of Carabidae (Coleoptera) on river banks. Entomol. Fenn. 6: 65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R. and Sæther B.E. 1996. Elg i Norge: biologiatferd og forvaltning. (In Norwegian with English summary) N.W. Damm and Søn A/S, Oslo.

  • Anderson M.J. and ter Braak C.J.F. (2002). Permutation tests for multifactorial analysis of variance. J. Stat. Comput. Sim. 73: 85–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines D., Sage R.B. and Baines M.M. (1994). The implications of red deer grazing to ground vegetation and invertebrate communities of Scottish native pinewoods. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 776–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard D., Legendre P. and Drapeau P. (1992). Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell J.H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M.J. (2002). Statistical Computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis P., Young M.R., Howard C.L. and Gordon I.J. (1997). The response of epigeal beetles (Col: CarabidaeStaphylinidae) to varied grazing regimes on upland Nardus stricta grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 433–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frislid R. and Jensen B. 1994. Norsk pattedyrhåndbok. (In Norwegian) H. Ashchehoug and Co, Oslo.

  • Gardner S.M., Hartley S.E., Davies A. and Palmer S.C.F. (1997). Carabid communities on heather moorlands in northeast Scotland: the consequences of grazing pressure for community diversity. Biol. Conserv. 81: 275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Megías A., Gómez J.M. and Sánchez-Piñero F. (2004). Effects of ungulates on epigeal arthropods in Sierra Nevada National Park (southeast Spain). Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. and Entsminger G.L. (2004). EcoSim: Null Models Software for Ecology. Version 7. Acquired Intelligence Inc. and Kesey-Bear, Jericho, VT, 05465

    Google Scholar 

  • Heliölä J., Koivula M. and Niemelä J. (2001). Distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across a forest-clearcut ecotone. Conserv. Biol. 15: 370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M.O. and Gauch H.G. (1980). Detrended correspondence-analysis – an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs N.T. (1996). Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. J. Wildlife Manage. 60: 695–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes P.R., Boyce D.C. and Reed D.K. (1993). The ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) fauna of Welsh peatland biotopes – factors influencing the distribution of ground beetles and conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 63: 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C.G., Lawton J.H. and Shachak M. (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C.G., Lawton J.H. and Shachak M. (1997). Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78: 1946–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kielland K. and Bryant J.P. (1998). Moose herbivory in taiga: effects on biogeochemistry and vegetation dynamics in primary succession. Oikos 82: 377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth C.H. (1986). The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Danmark. E.J. Brill/Scandinavian Press LTD., Leiden, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövei G.L. and Sunderland K.D. (1996). Ecology and behaviour of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 231–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McFerran D.M., Montgomery W.I. and McAdam J.H. (1994). Effects of grazing intensity on heathland vegetation and ground beetle assemblages of the uplands of County Antrim, Northeast Ireland. Biol. Environ. Proc. R. Irish Acad. 94B: 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes P.F., Naiman R.J., Pastor J. and Cohen Y. (1992). Effects of moose browsing on vegetation and litter of the boreal forest, Isle Royale, Michigan, USA. Ecology 73: 2059–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melis C., Buset A., Aarrestad P.A., Hanssen O., Meisingset E.L., Andersen R., Moksnes A. and Røskaft E. 2005. Impact of red deer Cervus elaphus L. grazing on bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus and composition of ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblage. Biodiv. Conserv. DOI 10.1007/s10531-005-2005-8.

  • Naiman R.J. (1988). Animal influences on ecosystem dynamics. Bioscience 38: 750–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olff H. and Ritchie M.E. (1998). Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor J., Dewey B., Naiman R.J., McInnes P.F. and Cohen Y. (1993). Moose browsing and soil fertility in the boreal forests of Isle-Royale-National-Park. Ecology 74: 467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy R.W., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A. and Rundel P.W. (1989). Plant Physiological Ecology. Field Methods and Instrumentation. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson I.L., Danell K. and Bergström R. (2000). Disturbance by large herbivores in boreal forests with special reference to moose. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 37: 251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • (2004). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo J.L. and Faeth S.H. (1999). Effect of vertebrate grazing on plant and insect community structure. Conserv. Biol. 13: 1047–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS for Windows 11.5 2002. SPSS Inc, USA.

  • Solberg E.J. and Sæther B-E. (1999). Hunter observations of moose Alces alces as a management tool. Wildlife Biol. 5: 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A.J.A. (2001). The impact of deer on lowland woodland invertebrates: a review of the evidence and priorities for future research. Forestry 74: 259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suominen O. (1999). Impact of cervid browsing and grazing on the terrestrial gastropod fauna in the boreal forests of Fennoscandia. Ecography 22: 651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suominen O., Danell K. and Bergström R. (1999). Moosetrees, and ground-living invertebrates: indirect interactions in Swedish pine forests. Oikos 84: 215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suominen O., Niemela J., Martikainen P., Niemela P. and Kojola I. (2003). Impact of reindeer grazing on ground-dwelling Carabidae and Curculionidae assemblages in Lapland. Ecography 26: 503–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. (1987). The analysis of vegetation–environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. (1992). Permutation versus bootstrap significance tests in multiple regression and ANOVA. In: Jöckel, K.H., Rothe, G. and Sendler, W. (eds) Bootstrapping and Related Techniques, pp 79–86. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. (1995). Ordination. In: Jongman, R.H.G. and ter Braak, C.J.F. (eds) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, pp 91–173. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Prentice I.C. (1988). A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P. (2002). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H.U. (1977). Carabid Beetles in Their Environments. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker J. (1984). Model interpretation from the additive elements of the likelihood function. J. R. Stat. Soc. C-App. 33: 52–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Melis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melis, C., Sundby, M., Andersen, R. et al. The role of moose Alces alces L. in boreal forest – the effect on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) abundance and diversity. Biodivers Conserv 16, 1321–1335 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6230-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6230-y

Keywords

Navigation