Abstract
The literature on social networks in labor markets often assumes that hiring through a network is a token in a reciprocal favor exchange. Yet, the scope and mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unclear. I propose a general theoretical framework that initially takes the stand-alone favor, rather than reciprocity, as a mode of economic allocation and identifies its institutional support structures. Markets and hierarchies shape favor-doing alongside social networks, often as a byproduct of their other functions. I find empirical evidence for social networks and market pricing as support structures for favors in the Russian post-socialist labor market of the 1990s. The mechanisms behind social networks are prior history and the general norm of reciprocity, while market pricing induces favors by those employers positioned in the middle of the wage distribution and thus exhibiting simultaneously two qualities: a willingness to do favors, because the jobs they have to offer are not sufficiently lucrative to attract the very best talent, and an ability to ask for favors, because nevertheless those jobs remain attractive enough for job seekers at large. Overall, this study shows how labor market institutions, originally set up to support competitive exchanges, affect the likelihood of favors in hiring, in tandem with the traditional support structure, social networks. Favor-doing in emerging markets is understood better as a broadly conceived institutionalized process having a variety of support structures, not just networks, that must be explored from the bottom up in each specific setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashwin, S. 1999. Russian workers: The anatomy of patience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ashwin, S., & Yakubovich, V. 2005. Cherchez la femme: Women as supporting actors in the Russian labor market. European Sociological Review, 21(2): 149–64.
Bartus, T. 2001. Social capital and earnings inequalities. The role of informal job search in Hungary. ICS Dissertation, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bian, Y. 1997. Indirect ties, network bridges, and job search in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3): 366–385.
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15: 97–118.
Bridges, W., & Villemez, W. 1986. Informal hiring and income in the labor market. American Sociological Review, 51(4): 574–582.
Burawoy, M., Krotov, P., & Lytkina, T. 2000a. Involution and destitution in capitalist Russia. Ethnography, 1(1): 43–65.
Burawoy, M., Krotov, P., & Lytkina, T. 2000b. Domestic involution: How women organize survival in a North Russian city. In V. Bonnell & G. Breslauer (Eds.). Russia in the new century. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., & Sun, F. 2011. Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4): 715–735.
Clarke, S. (Ed.). 1999. The formation of a labour market in Russia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Clarke, S. 2002. Making ends meet in Contemporary Russia: Secondary employment, subsidiary agriculture, and social networks. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S): 95–120.
Cox, D., Eser, Z., & Jimenez, E. 1998. Family safety nets during economic transition: A study of inter-household transfer in Russia. In J. Klugman (Ed.). Poverty in Russia: Public policy and private responses. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Fernandez, R. M., Castilla, E., & Moore, P. 2000. Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5): 1288–1356.
Fernandez, R. M., & Weinberg, N. 1997. Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. American Sociological Review, 62: 883–902.
Gerber, T. P., & Mayorova, O. 2010. Getting personal: Networks, institutions, and stratification in the Russian labor market, 1985–2001. American Journal of Sociology, 116(3): 855–904.
Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161–178.
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1: 201–233.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4): 481–510.
Granovetter, M. [1974] 1995. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Graves, B. 1970. Particularism, exchange, and organizational efficiency: A case study of a construction industry. Social Forces, 49(1): 72–81.
Heimer, C. A. 1992. Doing your job and helping your friends: Universalistic norms about obligations to particular others in networks. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kornai, J. 1992. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kornai, J. 1980. Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Kozina, I. 1999. Restrukturirovanie rynka truda I kanaly mobilnosti [Restructuring of a labor market and mobility channels]. In V. Kabalina & S. Clarke (Eds.). Zanyatost I povedenie domokhozyaystv. Adaptatsia k usloviyam perekhodnoy ekonomiki Rossii [Employment and households’ behavior. Adaptation to conditions of the Russian transitional economy]: 172–200. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Russian).
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. 1998. Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58(4): 465–481.
Ledeneva, A. V. 1998. Russia’s economy of favours. Blat, networking and informal exchange. Cambridge: University Press.
Ledeneva, A. V. 2012. Can Russia modernize? Sistema, power networks and informal governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, C. [1967] 1969. The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.
Lin, N., Ensel, W., & Vaughn, J. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4): 393–405.
Lomnitz, L. 1977. Networks and marginality. New York: Academic.
Malinowsky, B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Manwaring, T. 1984. The extended internal labour market. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(2): 161–187.
Mauss, M. [1950] 1990. The gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. New York: W. W. Norton.
Mayer, A. C. 1966. Quasi-groups in the study of complex societies. In M. Banton (Ed.). The social anthropology of complex societies. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
Molm, L. D., Whitham, M. M., & Melamed, D. 2012. Forms of exchange and integrative bonds: Effects of history and embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 77(1): 141–165.
Mouw, T. 2003. Social capital and finding a job: Do contacts matter?. American Sociological Review, 68: 868–898.
Nee, V. 1989. A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review, 54: 663–681.
Oxford English Dictionary. 2001. OED online. http://dictionary.oed.com. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. 1998. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 57–76.
Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.
Polanyi, K. 1957. The economy as instituted process. In K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg & H. W. Pearson (Eds.). Trade and market in the early empires. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Polanyi, K. 1977. In H. W. Pearson (Ed.). The livelihood of man. New York: Academic.
Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336.
Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. 2000. HLM5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Samara Goskomstat. 1999a. Pokazateli statistiki truda v economike Samaraskoy oblasti v yanvare-dekabre 1998 goda. Statisticheskiy bulleten [Indicators of labor statistics in the economy of Samara Oblast in January–December 1998. Statistical bulletin]. Samara: Goskomstat (in Russian).
Samara Goskomstat. 1999b. Samara-98. Statisticheskiy spravochnik [Samara-98. A statistical book]. Samara: Goskomstat (in Russian).
Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W., III, & Ott, L. 1996. Elementary survey sampling, 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Smirnov, O. V. 1996. Trudovoye pravo (Labor Law). Moscow: Prospect.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. 1999. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Stack, C. 1974. All our kin. New York: Harper & Row.
Stark, D. 1990a. La valeur du travail et sa retribution en Hongrie. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales (Paris), 85: 3–19 (in French).
Stark, D. 1990b. Privatization in Hungary: From plan to market or from plan to clan?. East European Politics and Societies, 4(3): 351–392.
Stark, D. 1996. Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4): 993–1027.
Szelenyi, I., Beckett, K., & King, L. 1994. The socialist economic system. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Szelenyi, I., & Kostello, E. 1998. Outline of an institutionalist theory of inequality: The case of socialist and postcommunist Eastern Europe. In M. C. Brinton & V. Nee (Eds.). The new institutionalism in sociology. New York: Russell Sage.
Uehara, E. 1990. Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 521–557.
Walder, A. 1986. Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weber, M. [1922] 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, (eds.) G. Roth & C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wellman, B. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 558–588.
Yakubovich, V. 1999. Sotsial’nye vozmozhnosti i ekonomicheskaya neobkhodimost: vkluchennost gorodskikh domokhozyastv v seti neformal’noy vzaimopomoshchi [Social opportunities and economic constraints: Participation in informal exchange networks of Russian urban households]. In V. Kabalina & S. Clarke (Eds.). Zanyatost I povedenie domokhozyaystv. Adaptatsiya k usloviyam perekhodnoy economiki v Rossii [Employment and households’ behavior. Adaptation to conditions of the Russian transitional economy]: 254–287. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Russian).
Yakubovich, V. 2001. Between exchange and reciprocity: Matching workers with jobs in a local Russian labor market. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, California.
Yakubovich, V. 2005. Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review, 70(3): 408–421.
Yakubovich, V., & Kozina, I. 2000. The changing significance of ties. An exploration of the hiring channels in the Russian transitional labor market. International Sociology, 15(3): 479–500.
Yakubovich, V., & Kozina, I. 2007. Recruitment at Russian enterprises. In M. Domsch & T. Lidokhover (Eds.). Human resource management in Russia: The current state of leadership, recruitment, payment, and training practices within Russian enterprises: 153–169. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Group.
Zeger, S., Liang, K.-Y., & Albert, P. 1988. Models for longitudinal data: A likelihood approach. Biometrics, 44: 1049–1060.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yakubovich, V. Getting a job as a favor in the Russian post-socialist labor market. Asia Pac J Manag 30, 351–372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9336-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9336-2