Skip to main content
Log in

Getting a job as a favor in the Russian post-socialist labor market

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on social networks in labor markets often assumes that hiring through a network is a token in a reciprocal favor exchange. Yet, the scope and mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unclear. I propose a general theoretical framework that initially takes the stand-alone favor, rather than reciprocity, as a mode of economic allocation and identifies its institutional support structures. Markets and hierarchies shape favor-doing alongside social networks, often as a byproduct of their other functions. I find empirical evidence for social networks and market pricing as support structures for favors in the Russian post-socialist labor market of the 1990s. The mechanisms behind social networks are prior history and the general norm of reciprocity, while market pricing induces favors by those employers positioned in the middle of the wage distribution and thus exhibiting simultaneously two qualities: a willingness to do favors, because the jobs they have to offer are not sufficiently lucrative to attract the very best talent, and an ability to ask for favors, because nevertheless those jobs remain attractive enough for job seekers at large. Overall, this study shows how labor market institutions, originally set up to support competitive exchanges, affect the likelihood of favors in hiring, in tandem with the traditional support structure, social networks. Favor-doing in emerging markets is understood better as a broadly conceived institutionalized process having a variety of support structures, not just networks, that must be explored from the bottom up in each specific setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashwin, S. 1999. Russian workers: The anatomy of patience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, S., & Yakubovich, V. 2005. Cherchez la femme: Women as supporting actors in the Russian labor market. European Sociological Review, 21(2): 149–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartus, T. 2001. Social capital and earnings inequalities. The role of informal job search in Hungary. ICS Dissertation, Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y. 1997. Indirect ties, network bridges, and job search in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3): 366–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15: 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, W., & Villemez, W. 1986. Informal hiring and income in the labor market. American Sociological Review, 51(4): 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M., Krotov, P., & Lytkina, T. 2000a. Involution and destitution in capitalist Russia. Ethnography, 1(1): 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M., Krotov, P., & Lytkina, T. 2000b. Domestic involution: How women organize survival in a North Russian city. In V. Bonnell & G. Breslauer (Eds.). Russia in the new century. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., & Sun, F. 2011. Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4): 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (Ed.). 1999. The formation of a labour market in Russia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. 2002. Making ends meet in Contemporary Russia: Secondary employment, subsidiary agriculture, and social networks. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S): 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., Eser, Z., & Jimenez, E. 1998. Family safety nets during economic transition: A study of inter-household transfer in Russia. In J. Klugman (Ed.). Poverty in Russia: Public policy and private responses. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. M., Castilla, E., & Moore, P. 2000. Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5): 1288–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. M., & Weinberg, N. 1997. Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. American Sociological Review, 62: 883–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, T. P., & Mayorova, O. 2010. Getting personal: Networks, institutions, and stratification in the Russian labor market, 1985–2001. American Journal of Sociology, 116(3): 855–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1: 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4): 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. [1974] 1995. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Graves, B. 1970. Particularism, exchange, and organizational efficiency: A case study of a construction industry. Social Forces, 49(1): 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, C. A. 1992. Doing your job and helping your friends: Universalistic norms about obligations to particular others in networks. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1992. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

  • Kornai, J. 1980. Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozina, I. 1999. Restrukturirovanie rynka truda I kanaly mobilnosti [Restructuring of a labor market and mobility channels]. In V. Kabalina & S. Clarke (Eds.). Zanyatost I povedenie domokhozyaystv. Adaptatsia k usloviyam perekhodnoy ekonomiki Rossii [Employment and households’ behavior. Adaptation to conditions of the Russian transitional economy]: 172–200. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. 1998. Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58(4): 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. V. 1998. Russia’s economy of favours. Blat, networking and informal exchange. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. V. 2012. Can Russia modernize? Sistema, power networks and informal governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. [1967] 1969. The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Lin, N., Ensel, W., & Vaughn, J. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4): 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomnitz, L. 1977. Networks and marginality. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowsky, B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manwaring, T. 1984. The extended internal labour market. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(2): 161–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. [1950] 1990. The gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. New York: W. W. Norton.

  • Mayer, A. C. 1966. Quasi-groups in the study of complex societies. In M. Banton (Ed.). The social anthropology of complex societies. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. D., Whitham, M. M., & Melamed, D. 2012. Forms of exchange and integrative bonds: Effects of history and embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 77(1): 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouw, T. 2003. Social capital and finding a job: Do contacts matter?. American Sociological Review, 68: 868–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V. 1989. A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review, 54: 663–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary. 2001. OED online. http://dictionary.oed.com. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. 1998. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1957. The economy as instituted process. In K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg & H. W. Pearson (Eds.). Trade and market in the early empires. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1977. In H. W. Pearson (Ed.). The livelihood of man. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. 2000. HLM5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samara Goskomstat. 1999a. Pokazateli statistiki truda v economike Samaraskoy oblasti v yanvare-dekabre 1998 goda. Statisticheskiy bulleten [Indicators of labor statistics in the economy of Samara Oblast in January–December 1998. Statistical bulletin]. Samara: Goskomstat (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samara Goskomstat. 1999b. Samara-98. Statisticheskiy spravochnik [Samara-98. A statistical book]. Samara: Goskomstat (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W., III, & Ott, L. 1996. Elementary survey sampling, 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, O. V. 1996. Trudovoye pravo (Labor Law). Moscow: Prospect.

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. 1999. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. 1974. All our kin. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. 1990a. La valeur du travail et sa retribution en Hongrie. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales (Paris), 85: 3–19 (in French).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. 1990b. Privatization in Hungary: From plan to market or from plan to clan?. East European Politics and Societies, 4(3): 351–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. 1996. Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4): 993–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szelenyi, I., Beckett, K., & King, L. 1994. The socialist economic system. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szelenyi, I., & Kostello, E. 1998. Outline of an institutionalist theory of inequality: The case of socialist and postcommunist Eastern Europe. In M. C. Brinton & V. Nee (Eds.). The new institutionalism in sociology. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara, E. 1990. Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 521–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. 1986. Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. [1922] 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, (eds.) G. Roth & C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Wellman, B. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 558–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakubovich, V. 1999. Sotsial’nye vozmozhnosti i ekonomicheskaya neobkhodimost: vkluchennost gorodskikh domokhozyastv v seti neformal’noy vzaimopomoshchi [Social opportunities and economic constraints: Participation in informal exchange networks of Russian urban households]. In V. Kabalina & S. Clarke (Eds.). Zanyatost I povedenie domokhozyaystv. Adaptatsiya k usloviyam perekhodnoy economiki v Rossii [Employment and households’ behavior. Adaptation to conditions of the Russian transitional economy]: 254–287. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakubovich, V. 2001. Between exchange and reciprocity: Matching workers with jobs in a local Russian labor market. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakubovich, V. 2005. Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review, 70(3): 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakubovich, V., & Kozina, I. 2000. The changing significance of ties. An exploration of the hiring channels in the Russian transitional labor market. International Sociology, 15(3): 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakubovich, V., & Kozina, I. 2007. Recruitment at Russian enterprises. In M. Domsch & T. Lidokhover (Eds.). Human resource management in Russia: The current state of leadership, recruitment, payment, and training practices within Russian enterprises: 153–169. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeger, S., Liang, K.-Y., & Albert, P. 1988. Models for longitudinal data: A likelihood approach. Biometrics, 44: 1049–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valery Yakubovich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yakubovich, V. Getting a job as a favor in the Russian post-socialist labor market. Asia Pac J Manag 30, 351–372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9336-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9336-2

Keywords

Navigation