Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inequality measures and equitable locations

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While making location decisions, the distribution of distances (outcomes) among the service recipients (clients) is an important issue. In order to comply with the minimization of distances as well as with an equal consideration of the clients, mean-equity approaches are commonly used. They quantify the problem in a lucid form of two criteria: the mean outcome representing the overall efficiency and a scalar measure of inequality of outcomes to represent the equity (fairness) aspects. The mean-equity model is appealing to decision makers and allows a simple trade-off analysis. On the other hand, for typical dispersion indices used as inequality measures, the mean-equity approach may lead to inferior conclusions with respect to the distances minimization. Some inequality measures, however, can be combined with the mean itself into optimization criteria that remain in harmony with both inequality minimization and minimization of distances. In this paper we introduce general conditions for inequality measures sufficient to provide such an equitable consistency. We verify the conditions for the basic inequality measures thus showing how they can be used in location models not leading to inferior distributions of distances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Hershey, J. C. (1972). A spatial-allocation model for regional health-services planning. Operations Research, 20, 629–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito Alonso, M. A., & Devaux, P. (1981). Location and size of day nurseries. European Journal of Operational Research, 6, 195–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, O. (1990). Mean-variance location problems. Transportation Science, 24, 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, O., & Kaplan, E. H. (1990). Equity maximizing facility location schemes. Transportation Science, 24, 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizosa, E. (1999). Minimizing the variance of euclidean distances. Studies in Locational Analysis, 12, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, P. B. (1980). Measuring the inequality of urban public services: a methodological discussion with applications. Policy Studies Journal, 8, 693–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Current, J., Min, H., & Schilling, D. (1990). Multiobjective analysis of facility location decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 49, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut, E. (1993). Inequality measures for location problems. Location Science, 1, 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R. L., McGinnis, L. F., & White, J. A. (1992). Facility layout and location: an analytical approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., & Pólya, G. (1934). Inequalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, A. M. (1995). Concepts of equity, fairness and justice in geographical studies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographer, 20, 500–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostreva, M. M., & Ogryczak, W. (1999a). Equitable approaches to location problems. In J.-C. Thill (Ed.), Spatial multicriteria decision making and analysis: a geographic information sciences approach (pp. 103–126). Brookfield: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostreva, M. M., & Ogryczak, W. (1999b). Linear optimization with multiple equitable criteria. RAIRO Recherche Opérationnelle, 33, 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostreva, M. M., Ogryczak, W., & Wierzbicki, A. (2004). Equitable aggregations and multiple criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 362–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labbé, M., Peeters, D., & Thisse, J.-F. (1996). Location on networks. In M. O. Ball, T. L. Magnanti, C. L. Monma & G. L. Nemhauser (Eds.), Handbook in operations research and management science: network routing (pp. 551–624). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-de-los-Mozos, M. C., & Mesa, J. A. (2001). The maximum absolute deviation measure in location problems on networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-de-los-Mozos, M. C., & Mesa, J. A. (2003). The sum of absolute differences on a network: algorithm and comparison with other equality measures. INFOR, 41, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, R. F., Morris, J. G., & Wesolowsky, G. O. (1988). Facilities location: models & methods. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maimon, O. (1986). The variance equity measure in locational decision theory. Annals of Operations Research, 6, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maimon, O. (1988). An algorithm for the Lorenz measure in locational decisions on trees. Journal of Algorithms, 9, 583–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J. (2000). Multicriteria spatial allocation of educational resources: an overview. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J., & Ogryczak, W. (1988). A multiobjective approach to reorganization of health service areas: a case study. Environment and Planning A, 20, 1461–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J., & Ogryczak, W. (1990). An interactive approach to the central facility location problem: locating pediatric hospitals in Warsaw. Geographical Analysis, 22, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. B. (1991). Modelling effectiveness-equity trade-offs in public service delivery systems. Management Science, 37, 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M. T., & Schilling, D. A. (1994). Equity measurement in facility location analysis: a review and framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. W., & Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, L. D., & Leonardi, G. (1982). Equity, efficiency, and accessibility in urban and regional health-care systems. Environment and Planning A, 14, 1479–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, P. B., & Francis, R. L. (1990). Discrete location theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L., & Symons, J. (1977). Efficiency and equity aspects of optimum location. Geographical Analysis, 9, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, A., & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G. F. (1991). Equity measures and facility location. Papers in Regional Science, 70, 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, S., & Puerto, J. (2005). Location theory: a unified approach. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. J. (1969). Model for planning the location and size of urban schools. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W. (1997a). On the lexicographic minimax approach to location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 100, 566–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W. (1997b). Linear and discrete optimization with multiple criteria: preference models and applications to decision support. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W. (1999). On the distribution approach to location problems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 37, 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W. (2000). Inequality measures and equitable approaches to location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 122, 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W., & Ruszczyński, A. (2002). Dual stochastic dominance and related mean-risk models. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13, 60–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W., & Tamir, A. (2003). Minimizing the sum of the k largest functions in linear time. Information Processing Letters, 85, 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W., & Zawadzki, M. (2002). Conditional median: a parametric solution concept for location problems. Annals of Operations Research, 110, 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pióro, M., & Medhi, D. (2004). Routing, flow and capacity design in communication and computer networks. San Francisco: Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsou, K.-W., Hung, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22, 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria decision-aid. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. P. (1994). Equity in theory and practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Włodzimierz Ogryczak.

Additional information

The research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies under grant 3T11C 005 27 “Models and Algorithms for Efficient and Fair Resource Allocation in Complex Systems”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogryczak, W. Inequality measures and equitable locations. Ann Oper Res 167, 61–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0234-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0234-9

Keywords

Navigation