Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of land use change and groundwater use impact on stream drying phenomena using a grid-based continuous hydrologic model

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of land use change on drying streams was evaluated using a grid-based continuous hydrological model (PGA-CC). For a drying stream-progressed watershed (398.8 km2), the model was calibrated and validated using 7 years (2005–2011) of streamflow data at the watershed outlet with an average Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency of 0.71. Based on the model simulation results for 36 years (1976 to 2011), both land use change and climate change decreased the 10-day minimum flow by 0.16 m3/s and increased the day counts below the annual average by 40.6 days/year. These changes resulted from the 8.7 % increase in urban area, 1.43-fold increase in groundwater use, and 1.1 °C temperature increase during the 36-year period. From the distributed results of the model, we identified the drying stream location and progression. The spring and winter seasons were relatively strongly affected, and drying streams were identified in more urbanized areas with greater groundwater use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn SR, Kim SJ (2014) Assessment of climate change impacts on the future hydrologic cycle of the Han river basin in South Korea using a grid-based distributed model. Irrig Drainage (in press)

  • Antrop M (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 67:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron OV, Barr AD, Donn MJ (2013) Effect of urbanisation on the water balance of a catchment with shallow groundwater. J Hydrol 485:162–176. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K (1982) On subsurface stormflow: predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows. Water Resour Res 18:1627–1633. doi:10.1029/WR018i006p01627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri B, Harbor J, Engel B, Grove M (2000) Assessing watershed-scale, long-term hydrologic impacts of land-use change using a GIS-NPS model. Environ Manag 26:643–658. doi:10.1007/s002670010122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Shu L (2006) Groundwater evapotranspiration captured by seasonally pumped wells in river valleys. J Hydrol 318:334–347. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin ML, Melloul AJ (2003) Assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution to promote sustainable urban and rural development. J Clean Prod 11:727–736. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00131-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries R, Eshleman KN (2004) Land-use change and hydrologic processes: a major focus for the future. Hydrol Process 18:2183–2186. doi:10.1002/hyp.5584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz ME, Clausen JC (2008) Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J Environ Manag 87:560–566. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Qian L, Rui H, Zuo T, Zheng D, Xu Y, Xu C (2012) Assessing the effects of urbanization on annual runoff and flood events using an integrated hydrological modeling system for Qinhuai River basin, China. J Hydrol 464:127–139. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase D (2009) Effects of urbanisation on the water balance – A long term trajectory. Environ Implant Assess Rev 29:211–219. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong WY, Park GA, Jeong IK, Kim SJ (2010) Development of a grid-based daily watershed runoff model and the 13 evaluation of its applicability. J Korean Soc Civ Eng 30:459–469

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Chae HS (1998) Development of GRid-based Soil Moisture Routing Model (GRISMORM) applied to Bocheongchun watershed. J GIS Assoc Korea 7:39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Chae HS, Yoo CS, Shin SC (2003) Stream discharge prediction via a grid-based soil water routing with paddy fields. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:1143–1155. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb03698.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Kwon HJ, Park GA, Lee MS (2005) Assessment of land-use impact on streamflow via a grid-based modelling approach including paddy fields. Hydrol Process 19:3801–3817. doi:10.1002/hyp.5982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Park GA, Lee YG, Ahn SR (2014) Development of a meso-scale distributed continuous hydrologic model and application for climate change impact assessment to Hanriver basin. J Korean Assoc Geogr Inf Stud 17(3):160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35:233–241. doi:10.1029/1998WR900018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2012) Food, agriculture, forestry and fisheries statistical yearbook

  • Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MLIT) (2009) A study on evaluation of drying stream and improvement

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott B, Uhlenbrook S (2004) Quantifying the impact of land-use changes at the event and seasonal time scale using a process-oriented catchment model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:62–78. doi:10.5194/hess-8-62-2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose S, Peters NE (2001) Effects of urbanization on streamflow in the Atlanta area (Georgia, USA): a comparative hydrological approach. Hydrol Process 15:1441–1457. doi:10.1002/hyp.218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rural Research Institute (2006) A study on causative factors of drying streams in rural area

  • Sanders RA (1986) Urban vegetation impacts on the hydrology of Dayton, Ohio. Urban Ecol 9:361–376. doi:10.1016/0304-4009(86)90009-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:1169–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonover JE, Lockaby BG, Helms BS (2006) Impacts of land cover on stream hydrology in the West Georgia Piedmont, USA. J Environ Qual 35:2123–2131. doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan PG, Moore ID (1984) Modelling subsurface streamflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds. Water Resour Res 20:1815–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef A, Feddes RA (1991) Preliminary review of revised FAO radiation and temperature methods. Land and Water Division FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Choi W, Deal BM (2005) Long-term impacts of land-use change on non-point source pollutant loads for the St. Louis metropolitan area, USA. Environ Manag 35:194–205. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0315-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (16AWMP-B079625-03) from the Water Management Research Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of the Korean government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Joon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, C.G., Kim, S.J. Evaluation of land use change and groundwater use impact on stream drying phenomena using a grid-based continuous hydrologic model. Paddy Water Environ 15, 111–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0533-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0533-3

Keywords

Navigation