Skip to main content
Log in

Effective Approximation for the Semiclassical Schrödinger Equation

  • Published:
Foundations of Computational Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The computation of the semiclassical Schrödinger equation presents major challenges because of the presence of a small parameter. Assuming periodic boundary conditions, the standard approach consists of semi-discretisation with a spectral method, followed by an exponential splitting. In this paper we sketch an alternative strategy. Our analysis commences with the investigation of the free Lie algebra generated by differentiation and by multiplication with the interaction potential: it turns out that this algebra possesses a structure which renders it amenable to a very effective form of asymptotic splitting: exponential splitting where consecutive terms are scaled by increasing powers of the small parameter. This leads to methods which attain high spatial and temporal accuracy and whose cost scales as \({\mathcal {O}}\!\left( M\log M\right) \), where \(M\) is the number of degrees of freedom in the discretisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Unless a non-existing term is subtracted and thus newly introduced instead of removed.

  2. Using a Fourier basis the cost is \({\mathcal {O}}\!\left( M\log M\right) \).

  3. As before, a tilde denotes a discretisation.

  4. All powers of \(\tau \) are odd because of the palindromy of the symmetric BCH formula. Since \(\tau ={\mathrm {i}}\Delta t\), this means that they always contribute a multiple of \(\pm {\mathrm {i}}\).

References

  1. Blanes, S., Casas, F. & Murua, A. (2006), Symplectic splitting operator methods tailored for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 234–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bungartz, H.-J. & Griebel, M. (2004), Sparse grids, Acta Numer. 13, 147–269.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casas, F. & Murua, A. (2009), An efficient algorithm for computing the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff series and some of its applications, J. Math. Phys. 50, (electronic).

  4. Faou, E. (2012), Geometric Numerical Integration and Schrödinger Equations, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics, The European Mathematical Society, Zürich.

  5. Gallopoulos, E. & Saad, Y. (1992), Efficient solution of parabolic equations by Krylov approximation methods, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 13, 1236–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golub, G. H. & Van Loan, C. F. (1996), Matrix Computations, 3rd edn, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

  7. Griffiths, D. J. (2004), Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  8. Hairer, E., Lubich, C. & Wanner, G. (2006), Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd edn, Springer, Berlin.

  9. Hesthaven, J. S., Gottlieb, S. & Gottlieb, D. (2007), Spectral Methods for Time-Dependent Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  10. Hochbruck, M. & Lubich, C. (1997), On Krylov subspace approximations to the matrix exponential operator, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34, 1911–1925.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iserles, A. (2008), A First Course in the Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  12. Iserles, A., Munthe-Kaas, H. Z., Nørsett, S. P. & Zanna, A. (2000), Lie-group methods, Acta Numer. 9, 215–365.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jin, S., Markowich, P. & Sparber, C. (2011), Mathematical and computational methods for semiclassical Schrödinger equations, Acta Numer. 20, 121–210.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lubich, C. (2008), From Quantum to Classical Molecular Dynamics: Reduced Models and Numerical Analysis, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics, The European Mathematical Society , Zürich.

  15. McLachlan, R. I. & Quispel, G. R. W. (2002), Splitting methods, Acta Numer. 11, 341–434.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McLachlan, R. I., Munthe-Kaas, H. Z., Quispel, G. R. W. & Zanna, A. (2008), Explicit volume-preserving splitting methods for linear and quadratic divergence-free vector fields, Found. Comput. Math. 8, 335–3554.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oteo, J. A. (1991), The Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula and nested commutator identities, J. Math. Phys. 32, 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reutenauer, C. (1993), Free Lie Algebras, London Mathematical Society Monographs 7, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  19. Tal Ezer, H. & Kosloff, R. (1984), An accurate and efficient scheme for propagating the time dependent Schrödinger equation, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3967–3976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yošida, H. (1990), Construction of higher order symplectic integrators, Phys. Lett. 150, 262–268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arieh Iserles.

Additional information

Communicated by Elizabeth Mansfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bader, P., Iserles, A., Kropielnicka, K. et al. Effective Approximation for the Semiclassical Schrödinger Equation. Found Comput Math 14, 689–720 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-013-9182-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-013-9182-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation