Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological impact of breast cancer screening in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of breast cancer screening by use of mammography and/or ultrasound, and to reveal factors related to psychological distress.

Methods

Three hundred and twenty women were recalled to our hospital because of suspicious malignant findings from breast cancer screening between March and November 2012. They were asked to complete three questionnaires: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression, the Brief Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced scale (Brief COPE) for coping styles, and an original questionnaire for personal information.

Results

Complete data were available for 312 of 320 women (97.5 %). The median age was 45 years (range 23–73). The HADS revealed borderline or clinically significant anxiety for 70 % of the women. Family history of breast cancer, area of residence, number of times screened, number of recalls, and the period before the first visit were significantly related to psychological distress (p < 0.05). Brief COPE scores showed that self-blame, behavioral disengagement, self-distraction, use of emotional support, venting, denial, and less acceptance were related to increased anxiety.

Conclusion

Seventy percent of women who were recalled after breast cancer screening experienced psychological distress. Thus, negative psychological impact should be regarded as an adverse effect of breast cancer screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gotzsche PC, Jorgensen KJ (2013) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:Cd001877

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151:716–726 (w-236)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolf SH (2010) The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 303:162–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380:1778–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Welch HG, Passow HJ (2014) Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography. JAMA Intern Med 174(3):448–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pace LE, Keating NL (2014) A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. JAMA 311:1327–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gram IT, Lund E, Slenker SE (1990) Quality of life following a false positive mammogram. Br J Cancer 62:1018–1022

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gram IT, Slenker SE (1992) Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited. Am J Public Health 82:249–251

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK et al (1991) Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 114:657–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brett J, Austoker J, Ong G (1998) Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment. J Public Health Med 20:396–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert FJ, Cordiner CM, Affleck IR et al (1998) Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 34:2010–2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B et al (2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psychooncology 14:917–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kasahara Y, Kawai M, Tsuji I et al (2013) Harms of screening mammography for breast cancer in Japanese women. Breast Cancer 20:310–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohnuki K (2005) Mammographic screening for non-palpable breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer 12:258–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kugaya A, Akechi T, Okuyama T et al (1998) Screening for psychological distress in Japanese cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 28:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carver CS (1997) You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 4:92–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Otsuka Y, Suzuki A, Takada M et al (2008) The Japanese version of the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced: a study of Japanese schoolteachers. Psychol Rep 103:395–405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Otsuka Y, Sasaki T, Iwasaki K et al (2009) Working hours, coping skills, and psychological health in Japanese daytime workers. Ind Health 47:22–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J et al (2001) Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 37:463–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson EK, Henderson BJ, Brett J et al (2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening on women with a family history of breast cancer—a systematic review. Psychooncology 14:939–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM et al (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lowe JB, Balanda KP, Del Mar C et al (1999) Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening. Cancer 85:1114–1118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brett J, Austoker J (2001) Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance. J Public Health Med 23:292–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Austoker J, Ong G (1994) Written information needs of women who are recalled for further investigation of breast screening: results of a multicentre study. J Med Screen 1:238–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ong G, Austoker J (1997) Recalling women for further investigation of breast screening: women’s experiences at the clinic and afterwards. J Public Health Med 19:29–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindfors KK, O’Connor J, Parker RA (2001) False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress. Radiology 218:247–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barton MB, Morley DS, Moore S et al (2004) Decreasing women’s anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:529–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pieterse K, van Dooren S, Seynaeve C et al (2007) Passive coping and psychological distress in women adhering to regular breast cancer surveillance. Psychooncology 16:851–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barron CR, Foxall MJ, Houfek JF (2005) Coping style and women’s participation in breast and gynecological screening. Health Care Women Int 26:247–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams-Piehota P, Pizarro J, Schneider TR et al (2005) Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography. Health Psychol 24:58–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Montgomery M, McCrone SH (2010) Psychological distress associated with the diagnostic phase for suspected breast cancer: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 66:2372–2390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all participants and colleagues who helped with the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical considerations

This study was conducted after obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee of St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Written informed consent was obtained from all eligible participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroko Tsunoda.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitano, A., Yamauchi, H., Hosaka, T. et al. Psychological impact of breast cancer screening in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 20, 1110–1116 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0845-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0845-0

Keywords

Navigation