Abstract
According to the IFCC, to determine the population-based reference interval (RI) of a test, 120 reference individuals are required. However, for some age groups such as newborns and preterm babies, it is difficult to obtain enough reference individuals. In this study, we consider both parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods for estimating RIs and the associated confidence intervals (CIs) in small sample size groups. We used data from four different tests [glucose, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and triglycerides], each in 120 individuals, to calculate the RIs and the associated CIs using nonparametric and parametric approaches. Also for each test, we selected small groups (m = 20, 30,…, 120) from among the 120 individuals and applied parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods. The glucose and creatinine data were normally distributed, and the parametric bootstrap method provided more precise RIs (i.e., the associated CIs were narrower). In contrast, the BUN and triglyceride data were not normally distributed, and the nonparametric bootstrap method provided better results. With the bootstrap methods, the RIs and CIs of small groups were similar to those of the 120 subjects required for the nonparametric method, with a slight loss of precision. For original data with normal or close to normal distribution, the parametric bootstrap approach should be used, instead of nonparametric methods. For original data that deviate significantly from a normal distribution, the nonparametric bootstrap should be applied. Using the bootstrap methods, fewer samples are required for computing RIs, with only a slightly increased uncertainty around the end points.
Abbreviations
- RI:
-
Reference interval
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- URIL:
-
Upper reference interval limit
- LRIL:
-
Lower reference interval limit
- BUN:
-
Blood Urea Nitrogen
- CLSI:
-
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- IFCC:
-
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- ISO:
-
International Standardization for Organization
References
Henny J (2007) Interpretation of laboratory results: the reference intervals, a necessary evil? Clin Chem Lab Med 45:939–941
Solberg HE (2006) In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE (eds) Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnosis, 4th edn. Elsevier Sounders, USA
Grasbeck R, Saris NE (1969) Establishment and use of normal values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 26 Suppl:S110
Henny J, Petersen PH (2004) Reference values: from philosophy to a tool for laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 42:686–691
CLSI (2008) Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory. Approved guideline, 3rd edn. CLSI document C28-A3c, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne
Solberg HE (1993) A guide to IFCC recommendations on reference values. JIFCC 5:160–164
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) Panel on Theory of Reference Values, The theory of reference values (1987) Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determination of reference limits. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 25:645–656
Linnet K (1987) Two-stage transformation system for normalization of reference distributions evaluated. Clin Chem 33:381–386
Horn PS, Pesce AJ, Copeland BE (1998) A robust approach to reference interval estimation and evaluation. Clin Chem 44:622–631
Linnet K (2000) Nonparametric estimation of reference intervals by simple and bootstrap-based procedures. Clin Chem 46:867–869
Wright EM, Royston P (1999) Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements. Stat Methods Med Res 8:93–112
Harrell FE, Davis CE (1982) A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika 69:635–640
Bain LJ, Engelhardt M (2000) Introduction to probability and mathematical statistics, 2nd edn. Duxbury Press, Belmont
Elveback LR, Guillier CL, Keating FR Jr (1970) Health, normality, and the ghost of Gauss. J Am Med Assoc 211:69–75
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability, 1st edn. Boca Raton
Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coskun, A., Ceyhan, E., Inal, T.C. et al. The comparison of parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods for reference interval computation in small sample size groups. Accred Qual Assur 18, 51–60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-012-0948-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-012-0948-5