Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pricing cloud IaaS services based on a hedonic price index

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cloud computing, as an innovative business model, has experienced rapid diffusion across the international business world, offering many benefits to both the demand and the supply side of the ICT market. In particular, the public cloud approach receives more attention and the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) model is expected to be the fastest growing model of public cloud computing, as it is considered to be a very good solution for companies needing the control of fundamental computing resources, such as memory, computing power and storage capacity. Currently, the battle for a dominant market share grows the competition among cloud providers and leads to the development of new pricing schemes, in order to meet the market demand. However, the choice of the cheapest cloud hosting provider depends exclusively on the clients’ needs and this is why prices for cloud services are a result of a multidimensional function shaped by the service’s characteristics. Into that context, this paper summarizes the findings of an initial work on the construction of a price index based on a hedonic pricing method, taking into account different factors of IaaS cloud computing services, including two of the most important players in the cloud market, Google and Microsoft Azure. The aim of this study is to provide price indices both on a continent level and globally, in an effort to investigate differences in pricing policies in different marketplaces. Comparing the results leads to important conclusions related to pricing policies of IaaS cloud services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Etro F (2009) The economic impact of cloud computing on business creation, employment and output in Europe. Rev Bus Econ 54(2):179–208

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mell P, Grance T (2011) The NIST definition of cloud computing. NIST special publication 800(145):7

  3. Anderson E, Eschinger C, Wurster L, de Silva F, Contu R, Liu V, Biscotti F, Petri G, Zhang J, Yeates M (2013) Forecast overview: public cloud services, worldwide, 2011–2016, 4Q12 Update, Market analysis and statistics. Gartner Group, Inc., Connecticut, USA

  4. Hurwitz J, Kaufman M, Halper DF (2012) Cloud services for dummies. IBM Limited Edition. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vinu Prasad G, Rao S, Prasad AS (2012) A combinatorial auction mechanism for multiple resource procurement in cloud computing. In: 12th International conference on intelligent systems design and applications (ISDA). IEEE, pp 337–344

  6. Siham EK, Schlereth C, Skiera B (2012) Price comparison for infrastructure-as-a-service. ECIS (p. 61):12

  7. Martens B, Walterbusch M, Teuteberg F (2012) Costing of cloud computing services: a total cost of ownership approach. In: 45th Hawaii international conference onsystem science (HICSS), 2012. IEEE, pp 1563–1572

  8. Andra RS (2013) Investigating pricing and negotiation models for cloud computing. MSc in High Performance, Computing University of Edinburgh:81

  9. Mitropoulou P, Filiopoulou E, Tsaroucha S, Michalakelis C, Nikolaidou M (2015) A hedonic price index for cloud computing services. In: CLOSER 2015, 5th international conference on cloud computing and services science, Lisbon, Portugal, 20–22 May 2015

  10. Sharma B, Thulasiram RK, Thulasiraman P, Buyya R (2015) Clabacus: a risk-adjusted cloud resources pricing model using financial option theory. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 3(3):332–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grivas SG, Kumar TU, Wache H (2010) Cloud broker: bringing intelligence into the cloud. In: 2010 IEEE 3rd international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD), 2010. IEEE, pp 544–545

  12. Petri I, Diaz-Montes J, Zou M, Beach T, Rana O, Parashar M (2015) Market models for federated clouds. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 3(3):398–410. doi:10.1109/TCC.2015.2415792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers O, Cliff D (2012) A financial brokerage model for cloud computing. J Cloud Comput 1(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grossman RL (2009) The case for cloud computing. IT Prof 11(2):23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Clamp P, Cartlidge J (2013) Pricing the cloud: an adaptive brokerage for cloud computing. In: 5th International conference on advances in system simulation (SIMUL-2013). IARIA XPS Press, Venice, Citeseer, pp 113–121

  16. Al-Roomi M, Al-Ebrahim S, Buqrais S, Ahmad I (2013) Cloud computing pricing models: a survey. Int J Grid Distributed Comput 6(5):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mihailescu M, Teo YM (2010) Dynamic resource pricing on federated clouds. In: 2010 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on cluster, cloud and grid computing (CCGrid), 2010. IEEE, pp 513–517

  18. Bonacquisto P, Modica GD, Petralia G, Tomarchio O (2014) A procurement auction market to trade residual cloud computing capacity. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 3(3):345–357. doi:10.1109/TCC.2014.2369435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rohitratana J, Altmann J (2012) Impact of pricing schemes on a market for Software-as-a-Service and perpetual software. Future Gener Computer Syst 28(8):1328–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li H, Liu J, Tang G (2011) A pricing algorithm for cloud computing resources. In: 2011 international conference on network computing and information security (NCIS), 2011. IEEE, pp 69–73

  21. Rohitratana J, Altmann J (2010) Agent-based simulations of the software market under different pricing schemes for Software-as-a-Service and perpetual software. In: Altmann et al. (eds) Economics of grids, clouds, systems, and services, ser Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

  22. Ruiz-Agundez I, Penya YK, Bringas PG (2011) A flexible accounting model for cloud computing. In: 2011 Annual SRII global conference (SRII), 2011. IEEE, pp 277–284

  23. Triplett JE (2004) Handbook on hedonic indexes and quality adjustments in price indexes. science, technology and industry working papers. OECD publishing, Paris

  24. Goodman AC (1978) Hedonic prices, price indices and housing markets. J Urban Econ 5(4):471–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Griliches Z (1961) Hedonic price indexes for automobiles: an econometric of quality change. In: The price statistics of the Federal Goverment. NBER, pp 173–196

  26. Chanel O, Gérard-Varet L-A, Ginsburgh V (1996) The relevance of hedonic price indices. J Cult Econ 20(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Political Econ 92:34–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pakes A (2002) A reconsideration of hedonic price indices with an application to PC’s. National Bureau of Economic Research. No. w8715, National Bureau of Economic Research

  29. Berndt ER, Griliches Z, Rappaport NJ (1995) Econometric estimates of price indexes for personal computers in the 1990’s. J Econ 68(1):243–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moreau A (1996) Methodology of the price index for microcomputers and printers in France. Ind Prod Int Comp Meas Issues 99–118

  31. Varoutas D, Deligiorgi K, Michalakelis C, Sphicopoulos T (2008) A hedonic approach to estimate price evolution of telecommunication services: evidence from Greece. Appl Econ Lett 15(14):1131–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Berndt ER (1991) The practice of econometrics: classic and contemporary. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  33. Czarnul P (2013) An evaluation engine for dynamic ranking of cloud providers. Informatica 37(2):123

    Google Scholar 

  34. Okraszewski M (2015) Cloudorado launches new cloud computing comparison service. prweb.com. http://www.prweb.com/releases/cloud/computing/prweb12455967.htm. Accessed 29 Jan 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics and Telematics, Harokopio University of Athens, 9 Omirou str, Tavros, Athens, Greece

    Persefoni Mitropoulou, Evangelia Filiopoulou, Christos Michalakelis & Mara Nikolaidou

Authors
  1. Persefoni Mitropoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evangelia Filiopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christos Michalakelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mara Nikolaidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Michalakelis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitropoulou, P., Filiopoulou, E., Michalakelis, C. et al. Pricing cloud IaaS services based on a hedonic price index. Computing 98, 1075–1089 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0493-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0493-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation