Skip to main content
Log in

Hysteresis correction of tactile sensor response with a generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tactile sensors are basically arrays of force sensors. Most of these force sensors are made of polymers or conductive rubber at lower cost, especially in the case of large area low-medium resolution tactile sensors. The consequence of such a decrease in cost and complexity is a worsening in performance. Hysteresis and drift are two main sources of error. Other tactile sensors do not present such limitations per se, however they are covered by a protective elastic layer in their final location and this covering can also lead to limitations. This paper presents a method to reduce the error caused by hysteresis in tactile sensors. This method is based on the generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model that has been applied to characterize hysteresis and saturation nonlinearities in smart actuators. The approximation error depends on several parameters as well as on the envelope functions that are chosen. Different alternatives are explored in the paper. Moreover, the model can also be inverted. This inverse model allows the force values to be obtained from the tactile sensor output while reducing the errors caused by hysteresis. In this paper the results of such an inversion are compared with other alternatives to register the data that do not compensate hysteresis. The average value of the hysteresis error measured in the experimental curve is 7.20% for an input range of 206 kPa, while this error is 1.51% following the compensation procedure. Since the implementation of tactile sensors usually results in the electronics being close to the raw sensor, and this hardware is also commonly based on a microcontroller or even on a FPGA, it is possible to add the algorithms presented in this paper to the set of compensation and calibration procedures to run in the smart sensor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Janaideh M, Rakheja S, Su C-Y (2009) A generalized Prandtl–Ishlisnkii model for characterizing the hysteresis and saturation nonlinearities of smart actuators. Smart Mater Struct 18(4):045001. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/4/045001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Janaideh M, Rakheja S, Su C-Y (2010) An analytical generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model inversion for hysteresis compensation in micropositioning control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatro 16(4):734–744. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2010.2052366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brokate M, Sprekels J (1996) Hysteresis and phase transitions. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos-Ramos J, Navas-González R, Macicior H, Sikora T, Ochoteco E, Vidal-Verdú F (2010) Tactile sensors based on conductive polymers. Microsyst Technol 16(5):765–776. doi:10.1007/s00542-009-0958-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnen K, Janocha H (2001) Inverse feedfordward controller for complex hysteretic nonlinearities in smart-material systems. Control Intell Sys 29(3):74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Oballe-Peinado O, Castellanos-Ramos J, Hidalgo-López JA, Vidal-Verdú F (2009) Direct interfaces for smart skins based on FPGAs. Proc SPIE 7365:73650C. doi:10.1117/12.821642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Durán J A, Hidalgo-López J A, Vidal-Verdú F, Ochoteco E (2010) Experimental evaluation of the incidence of tactile sensor limitations on application parameters. In: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society, Sensors Application Symposium (SAS) 175–178. doi: 10.1109/SAS.2010.5439424

  • Sánchez-Durán JA, Oballe-Peinado O, Castellanos-Ramos J, Vidal-Verdú F (2011) Hysteresis correction of tactile sensor response with a generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model. Proc SPIE 8066:80662L. doi:10.1117/12.886744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Verdú F, Oballe-Peinado O, Sánchez-Durán JA, Castellanos-Ramos J, Navas-González R (2011) Three realizations and comparison of hardware for piezoresistive tactile sensors. Sensors 11(3):3249–3266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visintin A (1994) Differential models of hysteresis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Visone C (2008) Hysteresis modeling and compensation for smart sensors and actuators. J Phys Conf Ser 138:1–24. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/138/1/012028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zareinejad M, Rezaei SM, Ghidary SS, Abdullah A, Motamedi M (2009) Robust impedance control of a piezoelectric stage under thermal and external load disturbances. Control Cybern 38(3):635–648

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by the Spanish government under contract TEC2009-14446-C02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. Sánchez-Durán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez-Durán, J.A., Oballe-Peinado, Ó., Castellanos-Ramos, J. et al. Hysteresis correction of tactile sensor response with a generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model. Microsyst Technol 18, 1127–1138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-012-1455-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-012-1455-7

Keywords

Navigation