Skip to main content
Log in

A fuzzy linear programming model for risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In traditional approach, failure mode and effects analysis determines the risk priories of failure modes through the risk priority number which is determined by multiplication of three risk factors namely, failure occurrence (O), failure severity (S) and failure detection ability (D). In this approach, different weights of risk factors were not taken into consideration so that the three risk factors were assumed to have the same weight. This may not be realistic in real applications. In this paper we treat the risk factors as fuzzy variables and evaluate them using fuzzy linguistic terms and fuzzy ratings. As a result, fuzzy risk priority numbers (FRPNs) are proposed for prioritization of failure modes. The FRPNs are defined as fuzzy geometric means of the fuzzy ratings for O, S and D and can be computed using alpha-level sets and linear programming models. A numerical example is provided to examine the results of this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bevilacqua M, Braglia M, Gabbrielli R (2000) Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant. Qual Reliab Eng Int 16:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003) Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19:425–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowles JB, Pelez CE (1995) Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Braglia M (2000) MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 17(9):1017–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003) Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(4):503–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang CL, Wei CC, Lee YH (1999) Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory. Kybernetes 28:1072–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang CL, Wei CC, Lee YH (2001) Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory. Integr Manuf Syst 12(3):211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chin KS, Wang YM, Poon GKK, Yang J-B (2009) Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis. Decis Support Syst 48:246–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Delgado M, Verdegay JL, Vila V (1993) Linguistic decision making models. Int J Intel Syst 7:479–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multi-attribute value functions. Oper Res 39:810–822

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia PAA, Schirru R, Frutuoso E, Melo PF (2005) A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA. Prog Nucl Energy 46(3-4):59–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsiao WF, Lin HH, Chang TM (2008) Fuzzy consensus measure on verbal opinions. Expert Syst Appl 35(3):836–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sankar NR, Prabhu BS (2001) Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 18(3):324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P (2008) Fuzzy modeling of system behavior for risk and reliability analysis. Int J Syst Sci 39(6):563–581

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Segismundo A, Augusto P, Miguel C (2008) Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in the context of risk management in new product Development, A case study in an automotive company. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(9):899–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang YM, Chin KS, Poon KKG, Yang JB (2009) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1195–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao N, Huang H-Z, Li Y, He L, Jin T (2011) Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA. Eng Fail Anal 18(4):1162–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang J, Huang H-Z, He L-P, Zhu S-P, Wen D (2011) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty. Eng Fail Anal 18(8):2084–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Z, Bonsall S, Wang J (2008) Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA. IEEE Trans Reliab 57(3):517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yue Z (2011) An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers. Knowl Based Syst 24(1):146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Z, Chu X (2011) Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Syst Appl 38(1):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions on the first version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hadi-Vencheh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadi-Vencheh, A., Hejazi, S. & Eslaminasab, Z. A fuzzy linear programming model for risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis. Neural Comput & Applic 22, 1105–1113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0874-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0874-9

Keywords

Navigation