Abstract
Despite calls for greater clarity and precision of population description, studies have documented persistent ambiguity in the use of race/ethnicity terms in genetic research. It is unclear why investigators tolerate such ambiguity, or what effect these practices have on the evaluation of reported associations. To explore the way that population description is used to replicate and/or extend previously reported genetic observations, we examined articles describing the association of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-γ Pro12Ala polymorphism with type 2 diabetes mellitus and related phenotypes, published between 1997 and 2005. The 80 articles identified were subjected to a detailed content analysis to determine (1) how sampled populations were described, (2) whether and how the choice of sample was explained, and (3) how the allele frequency and genetic association findings identified were contextualized and interpreted. In common with previous reports, we observed a variety of sample descriptions and little explanation for the choice of population investigated. Samples of European origin were typically described with greater specificity than samples of other origin. However, findings from European samples were nearly always compared to samples described as “Caucasian” and sometimes generalized to all Caucasians or to all humans. These findings suggest that care with population description, while important, may not fully address analytical concerns regarding the interpretation of variable study outcomes or ethical concerns regarding the attribution of genetic observations to broad social groups. Instead, criteria which help investigators better distinguish justified and unjustified forms of population generalization may be required.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altshuler D, Hirschhorn JN, Klannemark M, Lindgren CM, Vohl MC, Nemesh J, Lane CR, Schaffner SF, Bolk S, Brewer C, Tuomi T, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, Daly M, Groop L, Lander ES (2000) The common PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 26(1):76–80
Anonymous (2000) Census, race and science. Nat Genet 24(2):97–98
Anonymous (2004) The unexamined ‘Caucasian’. Nat Genet 36(6):541
Caulfield T, Fullerton SM, Ali-Khan SE, Arbour L, Burchard EG, Cooper RS, Hardy BJ, Harry S, Hyde-Lay R, Kahn J, Kittles R, Koenig BA, Lee SS, Malinowski M, Ravitsky V, Sankar P, Scherer SW, Seguin B, Shickle D, Suarez-Kurtz G, Daar AS (2009) Race and ancestry in biomedical research: exploring the challenges. Genome Med 1(1):8
Chanock SJ, Manolio T, Boehnke M, Boerwinkle E, Hunter DJ, Thomas G, Hirschhorn JN, Abecasis G, Altshuler D, Bailey-Wilson JE, Brooks LD, Cardon LR, Daly M, Donnelly P, Fraumeni JF Jr, Freimer NB, Gerhard DS, Gunter C, Guttmacher AE, Guyer MS, Harris EL, Hoh J, Hoover R, Kong CA, Merikangas KR, Morton CC, Palmer LJ, Phimister EG, Rice JP, Roberts J, Rotimi C, Tucker MA, Vogan KJ, Wacholder S, Wijsman EM, Winn DM, Collins FS (2007) Replicating genotype–phenotype associations. Nature 447(7145):655–660
Comstock RD, Castillo EM, Lindsay SP (2004) Four-year review of the use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic and public health research. Am J Epidemiol 159(6):611–619
Deeb SS, Fajas L, Nemoto M, Pihlajamäki J, Mykkänen L, Kuusisto J, Laakso M, Fujimoto W, Auwerx J (1998) A Pro12Ala substitution in PPARgamma2 associated with decreased receptor activity, lower body mass index and improved insulin sensitivity. Nat Genet 20(3):284–287
Foster MW (2009) Looking for race in all the wrong places: analyzing the lack of productivity in the ongoing debate about race and genetics. Hum Genet 126(3):355–362
Fujimura JH, Duster T, Rajagopalan R (2008) Race, genetics, and disease: questions of evidence, matters of consequence. Soc Stud Sci 38(5):643–656
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288
Hunt LM, Megyesi MS (2008a) The ambiguous meanings of the racial/ethnic categories routinely used in human genetics research. Soc Sci Med 66:349–361
Hunt LM, Megyesi MS (2008b) Genes, race and research ethics: who’s minding the store? J Med Ethics 34:495–500
Igl BW, Konig IR, Ziegler A (2009) What do we mean by ‘replication’ and ‘validation’ in genome-wide association studies? Hum Hered 67(1):66–68
Ioannidis JP, Boffetta P, Little J, O’Brien TR, Uitterlinden AG, Vineis P, Balding DJ, Chokkalingam A, Dolan SM, Flanders WD, Higgins JP, McCarthy MI, McDermott DH, Page GP, Rebbeck TR, Seminara D, Khoury MJ (2008) Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. Int J Epidemiol 37(1):120–132
Kaplan JB, Bennett T (2003) Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publication. JAMA 289(20):2709–2716
Lee C (2009) “Race” and “ethnicity” in biomedical research: how do scientists construct and explain differences in health? Soc Sci Med 68(6):1183–1190
Lee SS, Mountain J, Koenig B, Altman R, Brown M, Camarillo A, Cavalli-Sforza L, Cho M, Eberhardt J, Feldman M, Ford R, Greely H, King R, Markus H, Satz D, Snipp M, Steele C, Underhill P (2008) The ethics of characterizing difference: guiding principles on using racial categories in human genetics. Genome Biol 9(7):404 (Epub Jul 15)
Little J, Higgins JP, Ioannidis JP, Moher D, Gagnon F, von Elm E, Khoury MJ, Cohen B, Davey-Smith G, Grimshaw J, Scheet P, Gwinn M, Williamson RE, Zou GY, Hutchings K, Johnson CY, Tait V, Wiens M, Golding J, van Duijn C, McLaughlin J, Paterson A, Wells G, Fortier I, Freedman M, Zecevic M, King R, Infante-Rivard C, Stewart A, Birkett N (2009) Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement. Hum Genet 125(2):131–151
McCarthy MI, Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Goldstein DB, Little J, Ioannidis JP, Hirschhorn JN (2008) Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 9(5):356–369
Outram SM, Ellison G (2006) Anthropological insights into the use of race/ethnicity to explore genetic contributions to disparities in health. J Biosoc Sci 32:83–102
Race, Ethnicity, and Genetics Working Group (2005) The use of racial, ethnic, and ancestral categories in human genetics research. Am J Hum Genet 77(4):519–532
Sankar P (2006) Hasty generalisation and exaggerated certainties: reporting genetic findings in health disparities research. New Genet Soc 25(3):249–264
Sankar P, Cho MK (2002) Genetics. Toward a new vocabulary of human genetic variation. Science 298(5597):1337–1338
Sankar P, Cho MK, Mountain J (2007) Race and ethnicity in genetic research. Am J Med Genet 143A(9):961–970
Shanawani H, Dame L, Schwartz DA, Cook-Deegan R (2006) Non-reporting and inconsistent reporting of race and ethnicity in articles that claim associations among genotype, outcome, and race or ethnicity. J Med Ethics 32(12):724–728
Shields AE, Fortun M, Hammonds EM, King PA, Lerman C, Rapp R, Sullivan PF (2005) The use of race variables in genetic studies of complex traits and the goal of reducing health disparities: a transdisciplinary perspective. Am Psychol 60(1):77–103
Smart A, Tutton R, Ashcroft R, Martin PA, Ellison GTH (2006) Can science alone improve the measurement and communication of race and ethnicity in genetic research? Exploring the strategies proposed by Nature Genetics. BioSocieties 1(3):313–324
Smart A, Tutton R, Martin P, Ellison GT, Ashcroft R (2008) The standardization of race and ethnicity in biomedical science editorials and UK biobanks. Soc Stud Sci 38(3):407–423
Weber RP (1990) Basic content analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills
Yen C, Beamer BA, Negri C, Silver K, Brown KA, Yarnall DP, Burns DK, Roth J, Shuldiner AR (1997) Molecular scanning of the human peroxisome proliferator activated receptor g (hPPARγ) gene in diabetic Caucasians: identification of a Pro12Ala PPARγ2 missense mutation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 241:270–274
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Karen Edwards PhD, and members of the University of Washington Center for Genomics and Public Health, for providing access to the in-progress HuGE review of the PPARγ Pro12Ala association with type 2 diabetes and related phenotypes upon which our analysis is based. The authors also acknowledge Lizzeth Belskus-Amador, Aniel Solis, and Tessa Steel for research assistance. The article benefitted from the critical review of Melissa Austin, PhD, as well as several anonymous reviewers. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [P50 HG003374 to W.B.] and the Centers for Disease Control [U36 CCU300430-23 and U10 CCU025038 to K. Edwards].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fullerton, S.M., Yu, JH., Crouch, J. et al. Population description and its role in the interpretation of genetic association. Hum Genet 127, 563–572 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-010-0800-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-010-0800-0