Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do we really need a central governor to explain brain regulation of exercise performance?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper two different models of brain regulation of exercise performance are critically compared: the central governor model proposed by Noakes and colleagues, and an alternative psycholobiological model based on motivational intensity theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Crewe H, Tucker R, Noakes TD (2008) The rate of increase in rating of perceived exertion predicts the duration of exercise to fatigue at a fixed power output in different environmental conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol 103:569–577. doi:10.1007/s00421-008-0741-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gandevia SC (2001) Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 81:1725–1789

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcora SM (2007) Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem. J Physiol 578:371

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcora SM (2008) Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles heart and lungs. J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/japplphysiol.90378.2008

  • Marcora SM, Bosio A, de Morree HM (2008) Locomotor muscle fatigue increases cardiorespiratory responses and reduces performance during intense cycling exercise independently from metabolic stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294:R874–R883. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00678.2007

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noakes TD (2000) Physiological models to understand exercise fatigue and the adaptations that predict or enhance athletic performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:123–145. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010003123.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noakes TD (2007) Determining the extent of neural activation during maximal effort. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:2092. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180337dc2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD (2004) Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med 38:797–806. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2003.009852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2008) A comparison of central aspects of fatigue in submaximal and maximal voluntary contractions. J Appl Physiol 104:542–550. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01053.2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RA (1996) Brehm’s theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford, New York, pp 424–453

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, George Building, Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK

    Samuele M. Marcora

Authors
  1. Samuele M. Marcora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuele M. Marcora.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcora, S.M. Do we really need a central governor to explain brain regulation of exercise performance?. Eur J Appl Physiol 104, 929–931 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0818-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0818-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation