Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of trabecular meshwork width using swept source optical coherence tomography

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Measurements of the angle width by ultrasound biomicroscopy or anterior segment optical coherence tomography are usually performed 500 μm from the scleral spur, as the anterior part of trabecular meshwork (TM) is assumed to lie within this distance. The aim of this study was to measure TM width using swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, CASIA SS-1000, Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan), and to investigate factors influencing this measurement.

Methods

Participants underwent gonioscopy and SS-OCT imaging in the dark. High-definition SS-OCT images were corrected for refractive distortion; and customized software (ImageJ; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was utilized to measure TM width (distance between the scleral spur and Schwalbe’s line). Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between TM width with demographic and angle parameters.

Results

One hundred and forty eight Chinese subjects were analyzed. The majority was female (62.4 %); the mean age was 59.2 ± 8.68 years. Identification of the scleral spur and Schwalbe’s line with SS-OCT was possible in 590 (99.7 %) and 585 angle quadrants (98.8 %) respectively. TM width was wider in the inferior and superior quadrants (mean 889 [SD 138] and 793 [136] μm), compared to the nasal and temporal quadrants (712 [137] and 724 [115] μm, P < 0.001). There was a difference in average TM width between open (789 [100]) and closed angle eyes (753 [86]) (P = 0.048). There was no significant association between TM width and angle parameters, laterality, or demographic factors.

Conclusions

In SS-OCT HD images, the mean TM width varied from 710 to 890 μm in the different quadrants of the eye, and the inferior quadrant TM was the widest compared to other quadrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman DS, He M (2008) Anterior chamber angle assessment techniques. Surv Ophthalmol 53:250–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorairaj S, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2007) Quantitative evaluation of anterior segment parameters in the era of imaging. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 105:99–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung CK, Li H, Weinreb RN, Liu J, Cheung CY, Lai RY, Pang CP, Lam DS (2008) Anterior chamber angle measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography: a comparison between slit lamp OCT and Visante OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:3469–3474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choma M, Sarunic M, Yang C, Izatt J (2003) Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 11:2183–2189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK, Kamp G, Elzaiat SY (1995) Measurement of intraocular distances by backscattering spectral interferometry. Opt Commun 117:43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Potsaid B, Baumann B, Huang D, Barry S, Cable AE, Schuman JS, Duker JS, Fujimoto JG (2010) Ultrahigh speed 1050 nm swept source/Fourier domain OCT retinal and anterior segment imaging at 100,000 to 400,000 axial scans per second. Opt Express 18:20029–20048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oh WY, Yun SH, Vakoc BJ, Shishkov M, Desjardins AE, Park BH, de Boer JF, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE (2008) High-speed polarization sensitive optical frequency domain imaging with frequency multiplexing. Opt Express 16:1096–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yun S, Tearney G, de Boer J, Iftimia N, Bouma B (2003) High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging. Opt Express 11:2953–2963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung CK, Weinreb RN (2011) Anterior chamber angle imaging with optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond) 25:261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, Foster FS (1991) Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology 98:287–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Foster FS (1992) Ultrasound biomicroscopy of anterior segment structures in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 113:381–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 102: quantitative data—parametric & non-parametric tests. Singapore Med J 44:391–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung CY, Zheng C, Ho CL, Tun TA, Kumar RS, Sayyad FE, Wong TY, Aung T (2011) Novel anterior-chamber angle measurements by high-definition optical coherence tomography using the Schwalbe line as the landmark. Br J Ophthalmol 95:955–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Usui T, Tomidokoro A, Mishima K, Mataki N, Mayama C, Honda N, Amano S, Araie M (2011) Identification of Schlemm’s canal and its surrounding tissues by anterior segment fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:6934–6939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spencer WH, Alvarado J, Hayes TL (1968) Scanning electron microscopy of human ocular tissues: trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol 7:651–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasuga T, Chen YC, Bloomer MM, Hirabayashi KE, Hiratsuka Y, Murakami A, Lin SC (2013) Trabecular meshwork length in men and women by histological assessment. Curr Eye Res 38(1):75–79. doi:10.3109/02713683.2012.700757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jing T, Marziliano P, Wong HT (2010) Automatic detection of Schwalbe’s line in the anterior chamber angle of the eye using HD-OCT images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Soc [pages 3013–3016]. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626167

  18. Allingham RR, de Kater AW, Ethier CR (1996) Schlemm’s canal and primary open angle glaucoma: correlation between Schlemm’s canal dimensions and outflow facility. Exp Eye Res 62:101–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial support

The study was supported by a Translational Clinical Research Partnership grant from the Biomedical Research Council (BMRC), Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tin Aung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tun, T.A., Baskaran, M., Zheng, C. et al. Assessment of trabecular meshwork width using swept source optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 1587–1592 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2285-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2285-8

Keywords

Navigation