Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Galectin-3 is an independent marker for ventricular remodeling and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a recently discovered marker for myocardial fibrosis and elevated levels are associated with an impaired outcome after short-term follow-up in heart failure (HF) patients. However, whether Gal-3 is related to cardiac remodeling and outcome after long-term follow-up is unknown. Therefore, we determined the utility of Gal-3 as a novel biomarker for left ventricular remodeling and long-term outcome in patients with severe chronic HF.

Methods and results

A total of 240 HF patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III and IV were included. Patients were followed for 8.7 ± 1 years, had a mean age of 71 ± 0.6 years and 73 % of the study population was male. Circulating levels of NT-proBNP and Gal-3 were measured. Serial echocardiography was performed at baseline and at 3 months. At baseline median left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was 267 mL [interquartile range 232–322]. Patients were divided into three groups according to the change in LVEDV. Patients in whom the LVEDV decreased over time had significant lower levels of Gal-3 at entry compared to patients in whom the LVEDV was stable or increased (14.7 vs. 17.9 vs. 19.0 ng/mL; p = 0.004 for trend), whereas no significant differences were seen in levels of NT-proBNP (p = 0.33). Multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that Gal-3 levels were positively correlated to change in LVEDV (p = 0.007). In addition, Gal-3 was a significant predictor of mortality after long-term follow-up (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Gal-3 is associated with left ventricular remodeling determined by serial echocardiography and predicts long-term mortality in patients with severe chronic HF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DEAL-HF:

Deventer Alkmaar Heart Failure study

EF:

Ejection fraction

Gal-3:

Galectin-3

HF:

Heart failure

HFpEF:

Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction

HFrEF:

Heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction

LVEDV:

Left ventricle end-diastolic volume

LVESV:

Left ventricular end-systolic volume

NPs:

Natriuretic peptides

NT-proBNP:

N-terminal part pro brain natriuretic peptide

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

References

  1. Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N (2000) Cardiac remodeling–concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:569–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickstein K et al (2008) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J 29:2388–2442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Franke J et al (2011) Is there an additional benefit of serial NT-proBNP measurements in patients with stable chronic heart failure receiving individually optimized therapy? Clin Res Cardiol 100:1059–1067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Binder A et al (2010) Limited value of brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic marker in acute heart failure—a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 145:540–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Emdin M, Vittorini S, Passino C, Clerico A (2009) Old and new biomarkers of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 11:331–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Battistoni A, Rubattu S, Volpe M (2012) Circulating biomarkers with preventive, diagnostic and prognostic implications in cardiovascular diseases. Int J Cardiol 157(2):160–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Böhm M et al (2011) Biomarkers: optimizing treatment guidance in heart failure. Clin Res Cardiol 100:973–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma UC et al (2004) Galectin-3 marks activated macrophages in failure-prone hypertrophied hearts and contributes to cardiac dysfunction. Circulation 110:3121–3128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Boer RA, Yu L, van Veldhuisen DJ (2010) Galectin-3 in cardiac remodeling and heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep 7:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu FT et al (1995) Expression and function of galectin-3, a beta-galactoside-binding lectin, in human monocytes and macrophages. Am J Pathol 147:1016–1028

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Kimmenade RR et al (2006) Utility of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, galectin-3, and apelin for the evaluation of patients with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1217–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah RV, Chen-Tournoux AA, Picard MH, van Kimmenade RRJ, Januzzi JL (2010) Galectin-3, cardiac structure and function, and long-term mortality in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 12:826–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van Veldhuisen DJ et al (2009) Clinical and prognostic value of galectin-3, a novel fibrosis-associated biomarker, in patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 15:814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Milting H et al (2008) Plasma biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis and remodeling in terminal heart failure patients supported by mechanical circulatory support devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 27:589–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueland T et al (2011) Galectin-3 in heart failure: high levels are associated with all-cause mortality. Int J Cardiol 150:361–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruggink-André de la Porte PWF et al (2005) Heart failure programmes in countries with a primary care-based health care system. Are additional trials necessary? Design of the DEAL-HF study. Eur J Heart Fail 7:910–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de la Porte PW et al (2007) Added value of a physician-and-nurse-directed heart failure clinic: results from the Deventer-Alkmaar heart failure study. Heart 93:819–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Remme W (2001) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 22:1527–1560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1976) Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 37:7–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van Bommel RJ et al (2009) Characteristics of heart failure patients associated with good and poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a PROSPECT (Predictors of Response to CRT) sub-analysis. Eur Heart J 30:2470–2477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolosi GL et al (2009) Effects of perindopril on cardiac remodelling and prognostic value of pre-discharge quantitative echocardiographic parameters in elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: the PREAMI echo sub-study. Eur Heart J 30:1656–1665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Christenson RH et al (2010) Multi-center determination of galectin-3 assay performance characteristics: Anatomy of a novel assay for use in heart failure. Clin Biochem 43:683–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smilde TDJ, van Veldhuisen DJ, Navis G, Voors AA, Hillege HL (2006) Drawbacks and prognostic value of formulas estimating renal function in patients with chronic heart failure and systolic dysfunction. Circulation 114:1572–1580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Boer RA, Pinto YM, van Veldhuisen DJ (2003) The imbalance between oxygen demand and supply as a potential mechanism in the pathophysiology of heart failure: the role of microvascular growth and abnormalities. Microcirculation 10:113–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lok DJA et al (2010) Prognostic value of galectin-3, a novel marker of fibrosis, in patients with chronic heart failure: data from the DEAL-HF study. Clin Res Cardiol 99:323–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Clerico A et al (1998) Circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP) measured by highly sensitive and specific immunoradiometric assays in normal subjects and in patients with different degrees of heart failure. J Endocrinol Invest 21:170–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. de Boer RA et al (2011) Predictive value of plasma galectin-3 levels in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Ann Med 43:60–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

BG Medicine, Inc. has certain rights related to Galectin-3 measurements. BG Medicine, Inc. provided an unrestricted research grant to the Department of Cardiology of the University Medical Center Groningen, that employs dr. van der Meer, Lipsic, de Boer and van Veldhuisen. Dr. van Veldhuisen and de Boer have received consultancy and speaker’s fees from BG Medicine, Inc. The Deventer Cardiology Research department received an unrestricted research grant from BG Medicine Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk J. Lok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lok, D.J., Lok, S.I., Bruggink-André de la Porte, P.W. et al. Galectin-3 is an independent marker for ventricular remodeling and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. Clin Res Cardiol 102, 103–110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-012-0500-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-012-0500-y

Keywords

Navigation