Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches

  • Topic paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition, affecting women of all ages. Both abdominal (open and laparoscopic) and vaginal approaches are utilised by the surgeon to achieve the best result for the patient. The aim of this review is to evaluate the most common surgical techniques used to correct POP based on current evidence and our experience.

Method

PubMed was searched using the following terms: ‘pelvic organ prolapse; vaginal prolapse surgery; abdominal prolapse surgery’. These studies were complimented by our personal experience in diagnosing and treating women with prolapse.

Results

Current evidence suggests that attention to the apical compartment is paramount to decrease the risk of recurrent POP. Apical procedures include abdominal sacrocolpopexy (hysteropexy), vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament suspension. The use of vaginal polypropylene mesh is controversial but may have a place in repair of recurrent prolapse, particularly of the anterior compartment. The vaginal approach has a lower morbidity and is appropriate especially in the elderly or medically compromised. The abdominal sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy is our preferred procedure when vaginal capacity is reduced and ongoing sexual function is important, or when fertility and future pregnancies are desired.

Conclusion

POP is a complex condition requiring individualised patient care. The pelvic surgeon needs to be proficient in a number of different prolapse surgical techniques so that surgical treatment can be tailored to patient needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N (2010) Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 116:1096–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DeLancey JO (1994) The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 6:313–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jha S, Moran P (2011) The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22:517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jha S, Moran PA (2007) National survey on the management of prolapse in the UK. Neurourol Urodyn 26:325–331; discussion 32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vanspauwen R, Seman E, Dwyer P (2010) Survey of current management of prolapse in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50:262–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA (2004) Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 111:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Somunkiran A, Gul OK, Gul B, Doyran GD (2007) Abdominal paravaginal defect repair in the treatment of paravaginal defect and urodynamic stress incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol 27:601–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shippey SH, Quiroz LH, Sanses TV, Knoepp LR, Cundiff GW, Handa VL (2010) Anatomic outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with or without paravaginal repair. Int Urogynecol J 21:279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Viana R, Colaco J, Vieira A, Goncalves V, Retto H (2006) Cystocele—vaginal approach to repairing paravaginal fascial defects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:621–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morse AN, O’Dell KK, Howard AE, Baker SP, Aronson MP, Young SB (2007) Midline anterior repair alone vs anterior repair plus vaginal paravaginal repair: a comparison of anatomic and quality of life outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:245–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dwyer P (2006) Evolution of biological and synthetic grafts in reconstructive pelvic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 17:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rane A, Kannan K, Barry C, Balakrishnan S, Lim Y, Corstiaans A (2008) Prospective study of the Perigee system for the management of cystocoeles—medium-term follow up. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48:427–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore RD, Beyer RD, Jacoby K, Freedman SJ, McCammon KA, Gambla MT (2010) Prospective multicenter trial assessing type I, polypropylene mesh placed via transobturator route for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse with 2-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 21:545–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Culligan PJ, Littman PM, Salamon CG, Priestley JL, Shariati A (2010) Evaluation of a transvaginal mesh delivery system for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse: subjective and objective findings at least 1 year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:506 e1–506 e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cundiff GW, Fenner D (2004) Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 104:1403–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD (2006) Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1762–1771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy M (2008) Clinical practice guidelines on vaginal graft use from the society of gynecologic surgeons. Obstet Gynecol 112:1123–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1373; discussion 73–74

    Google Scholar 

  21. Margulies RU, Rogers MA, Morgan DM (2010) Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:124–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC (2000) Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1402–1410; discussion 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Krueger Sullivan L, Schon Ybarra MA, Bent AE (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97:873–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dwyer PL, Fatton B (2008) Bilateral extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension: a new approach to correct posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:283–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fatton B, Dwyer PL, Achtari C, Tan PK (2009) Bilateral extraperitoneal uterosacral vaginal vault suspension: a 2-year follow-up longitudinal case series of 123 patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:427–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCall M (1957) Posterior culdeplasty; surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy: a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol 10:595–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR (1999) Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:859–865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Richter K, Albrich W (1981) Long-term results following fixation of the vagina on the sacrospinal ligament by the vaginal route (vaginaefixatio sacrospinalis vaginalis). Am J Obstet Gynecol 141:811–816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldberg RP, Tomezsko JE, Winkler HA, Koduri S, Culligan PJ, Sand PK (2001) Anterior or posterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: long-term anatomic and functional evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 98:199–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sze EH, Meranus J, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Karram MM (2001) Vaginal configuration on MRI after abdominal sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:375–379; discussion 79–80

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meschia M, Bruschi F, Amicarelli F, Pifarotti P, Marchini M, Crosignani PG (1999) The sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: critical analysis of outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:155–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Colombo M, Milani R (1998) Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:13–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE (2010) One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Vayrynen T, Falconer C (2009) Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113:117–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abbasy S, Kenton K (2010) Obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:86–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fynes M, Goh J, Chong C, Murray C, Rosamilia A, Dwyer P et al (2001) Abdominal sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:14

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cvach K, Cundiff G (2010) Abdominal sacral hysteropexy: clinical outcomes compared to abdominal sacral colpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy. In: ICS/IUGA meeting, Toronto. Abstract no. 677

  39. Lowenstein L, Fitz A, Kenton K, FitzGerald MP, Mueller ER, Brubaker L (2009) Transabdominal uterosacral suspension: outcomes and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:656 e1–656 e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004014

  41. Sanses TV, Shahryarinejad A, Molden S, Hoskey KA, Abbasy S, Patterson D et al (2009) Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows’ Pelvic Research Network study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:519 e1–519 e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O’Rourke P (2011) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:360 e1–360 e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113:367–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urogynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, 163 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, 3084, Australia

    Kristina Cvach & Peter Dwyer

Authors
  1. Kristina Cvach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Dwyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Cvach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cvach, K., Dwyer, P. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches. World J Urol 30, 471–477 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0776-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0776-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation