Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative Fluid Restriction in Major Abdominal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized, Clinical Trials

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Fluid management is a fundamental component of surgical care. Recently, there has been considerable interest in perioperative fluid restriction as a method of facilitating recovery following elective major surgery. A number of randomized trials have addressed the issue in various surgical specialities, and a recent meta-analysis proposed uniform definitions regarding fluid amount as well as examining fluid restriction in patients undergoing colonic resection.

Methods

Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings, and article reference lists were searched to identify randomized, controlled trials of perioperative fluid restriction versus “standard” perioperative fluid management, as per definitions formulated previously. All of the studies involved patients undergoing colonic resection. The primary outcome measure was postoperative morbidity. Secondary endpoints included mortality, renal failure, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. A random effects model was applied.

Results

Seven randomized, controlled trials with a total of 856 patients investigating standard versus restrictive fluid regimes, as denoted by the definitions, were included. Perioperative fluid restriction had no effect on the risk of postoperative complications (OR 0.49 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.2–1.18; P = 0.101). There was no detectable effect on death and fluid restriction did not reduce hospital stay (Pooled weighted mean difference −0.25; 95 % CI 0.72–0.21; P = 0.29).

Conclusions

Perioperative fluid restriction does not significantly reduce the risk of complications following major abdominal surgery. Furthermore, it does not appear to reduce length of hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tambyraja AL, Sengupta F, MacGregor AB, Bartolo DC, Fearon KC (2004) Patterns and clinical outcomes associated with routine intravenous sodium and fluid administration after colorectal resection. World J Surg 28(10):1046–1051. doi:10.1007/s00268-004-7383-7 discussion 1051–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walsh SR, Walsh CJ (2005) Intravenous fluid-associated morbidity in postoperative patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87(2):126–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh SR, Cook EJ, Bentley R, Farooq N, Gardner-Thorpe J, Tang T et al (2008) Perioperative fluid management: prospective audit. Int J Clin Pract 62(3):492–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moller AM, Pedersen T, Svendsen PE, Engquist A (2002) Perioperative risk factors in elective pneumonectomy: the impact of excess fluid balance. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19(1):57–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowell JA, Schifferdecker C, Driscoll DF, Benotti PN, Bistrian BR (1990) Postoperative fluid overload: not a benign problem. Crit Care Med 18(7):728–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lobo DN, Macafee DA, Allison SP (2006) How perioperative fluid balance influences postoperative outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 20(3):439–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H (2002) Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 89:622–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sear JW (2005) Kidney dysfunction in the postoperative period. Br J Anaesth 95(1):20–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McArdle GT, McAuley DF, McKinley A, Blair P, Hoper M, Harkin DW (2009) Preliminary results of a prospective randomised trial of restrictive versus standard fluid regime in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg 250(1):28–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boldt J (2006) Fluid management of patients undergoing abdominal surgery—more questions than answers. Eur J Anaesthesiol 23:631–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holte K, Kehlet H (2006) Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg 202:971–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J (2009) Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 96(4):331–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, Perkins AC, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP (2002) Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9320):1812–1818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K et al (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238:641–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackay G, Fearon K, McConnachie A, Serpell MG, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93(12):1469–1474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I (2005) Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intra-abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 103(1):25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J, Valentiner L, Lund C, Bie P et al (2007) Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 99:500–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kabon B, Akca O, Taguchi A, Nagele A, Jebadurai R, Arkilic CF et al (2005) Supplemental intravenous crystalloid administration does not reduce the risk of surgical wound infection. Anesth Analg 101:1546–1553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller RD (ed) (2005) Miller’s anesthesia, 6th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2009) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration

  22. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 354:1896–1900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Der Simonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abraham-Nordling M, Hjern F, Pollack J, Prytz M, Borg T, Kressner U (2012) Randomized clinical trial of fluid restriction in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 99(2):186–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vermeulen H, Hofland J, Legemate DA, Ubbink DT (2009) Intravenous fluid restriction after major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded clinical trial. Trials 10:50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalyan J, Rosbergen M, Pal N, Sargen K, Fletcher S, Nunn D, Clark A, Williams M, Lewis M. A prospective randomised observer blinded controlled trial of fluid and salt restriction in elective gastrointestinal surgery (Abstract)

  28. Varadhan KK, Lobo DN (2010) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc 69:488–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article received no funding

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Boland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boland, M.R., Noorani, A., Varty, K. et al. Perioperative Fluid Restriction in Major Abdominal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized, Clinical Trials. World J Surg 37, 1193–1202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1987-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1987-8

Keywords

Navigation