Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Practice Patterns in Breast Cancer Surgery: Canadian Perspective

  • Original Scientific Reports
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer is a common disease, and the surgical management is continually evolving. The objective of this study was to describe the current breast cancer practice patterns among Canadian surgeons. All active General Surgeons (n = 1172), as accredited by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, were sent a 31-item questionnaire. Anonymous responses were collected and analyzed regarding surgeon demographics, practice, and perceptions regarding surgical care of breast cancer patients. Overall 640 active surgeons responded; of these, 519 (81%) treated breast cancer and formed the study cohort. Practice settings included community (55%), community with university affiliation (28%), and academic (17%). The majority of surgeons (76%) stated that < 25% of their practice was devoted to breast disease, and 42% performed ≤ 2 breast cancer operations/month. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) was used by 57% of surgeons. On multivariate analysis, higher surgeon volume of breast cancer cases (p = 0.0008), fellowship training in Surgical Oncology (p = 0.009), community population (p = 0.001), and academic practice setting (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with the use of IBR. Of the 640 surgeons who responded, 79% stated that breast cancer surgery should be performed by “most general surgeons.” In Canada, most breast cancer surgery was performed by general surgeons who did not appear to have an interest, as defined by training or clinical volume, in breast cancer. Although variability regarding specific surgical issues was found among subgroups of surgeons, the majority of respondents felt that most general surgeons should treat breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Appendix 1
Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2001, Toronto, Canada, 2001

  2. JC Bloodgood (1930) ArticleTitleProblems of cancer J. Kansas Med. Soc. 31 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  3. U Veronesi A Banfi M Vecchio ParticleDel et al. (1986) ArticleTitleComparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long-term results Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 22 1085–1089 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiD2Mvhs1U%3D Occurrence Handle3536526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. B Fisher S Anderson J Bryant et al. (2002) ArticleTitleTwenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 347 1233–1241 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa022152 Occurrence Handle12393820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D Sarrazin MG Lê R Arriagada et al. (1989) ArticleTitleTen-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer Radiother. Oncol. 14 177–184 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaB387msVw%3D Occurrence Handle2652199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. RC Blichert-Toft JA Andersen M Overgaard et al. (1992) ArticleTitleDanish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 11 19–25 Occurrence Handle1627427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. AS Lichter ME Lippman DN Danforth et al. (1992) ArticleTitleMastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute J. Clin. Oncol. 10 976–983 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B28fpsFA%3D Occurrence Handle1588378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JA Dongen Particlevan H Bartelink IS Fentiman et al. (1992) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 Trial J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 11 15–18 Occurrence Handle1627421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. InstitutionalAuthorNameEarly Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (1995) ArticleTitleEffects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials N. Engl. J. Med. 333 1444–1455

    Google Scholar 

  10. B Fisher A Brown E Mamounas et al. (1997) ArticleTitleEffect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 J. Clin. Oncol. 15 2483–2493 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXkslymsr8%3D Occurrence Handle9215816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AU Buzdar SE Singletary DJ Booser et al. (1995) ArticleTitleCombined modality treatment of stage III and inflammatory breast cancer: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience Surg. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 4 715–734 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC3MbgtVQ%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G Bonadonna P Valagussa C Brambilla et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePrimary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute J. Clin. Oncol. 16 93–100 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gtFKkug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9440728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. AE Giuliano DM Kirgan JM Guenther et al. (1994) ArticleTitleLymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer Ann. Surg. 230 390–401

    Google Scholar 

  14. U Veronesi G Paganelli G Viale et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91 368–373 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/91.4.368 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lvVWmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10050871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. CE Cox F Haddad S Bass et al. (1998) ArticleTitleLymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancer Oncology 12 1283–1292 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltFKqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9778675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D Krag D Weaver T Ashikaga et al. (1998) ArticleTitleThe sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study N. Engl. J. Med. 339 941–946 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhvVKntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9753708

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. KM McMasters SL Wong C Chao et al. (2001) ArticleTitleDefining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques Ann. Surg. 234 292–299 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200109000-00003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrjt1ynsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11524582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. CE Cox SS Bass D Boulware et al. (1999) ArticleTitleImplementation of new surgical technology: outcome measures for lymphatic mapping of breast carcinoma Ann. Surg. Oncol. 6 553–561 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvitFeltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10493623

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. RT Patel DJ Webster RE Mansel et al. (1993) ArticleTitleIs immediate postmastectomy reconstruction safe in the long term? Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 19 372–375 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA28rmsVw%3D Occurrence Handle8359285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. SE Singletary (1997) ArticleTitleSkin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience Ann. Surg. Oncol. 3 411–416

    Google Scholar 

  21. RM Simmons SK Fish L Gayle et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLocal and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies Ann. Surg. Oncol. 6 676–681 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FitlGisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10560854

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Porter GA, MacMulkin H. Sentinel lymph node biopsy practice patterns in breast cancer: the Canadian perspective. Ann. Surg. Oncol. In Press

    Google Scholar 

  23. AB Nattinger MS Gottlieb J Veum et al. (1992) ArticleTitleGeographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 326 1102–1107 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3cvhvFY%3D Occurrence Handle1552911

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DC Farrow WC Hunt M Samet (1992) ArticleTitleGeographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 326 1097–1101 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3cvhvFU%3D Occurrence Handle1552910

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. NA Iscoe V Goel K Wu et al. (1994) ArticleTitleVariation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario Can. Med. Assoc. J. 150 345–363 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC38zhvFU%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. E Guadagnoli JC Weeks CL Shapiro et al. (1998) ArticleTitleUse of breast-conserving surgery for treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 16 101–106 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gtFKkuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9440729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. C Sawka I Olivotto A Coldman et al. (1997) ArticleTitleThe association between population-based treatment guidelines and adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer Br. J. Cancer 75 1534–1542 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3cbltlE%3D Occurrence Handle9166950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. E Guadagnoli CL Shapiro JC Weeks et al. (1998) ArticleTitleThe quality of care for treatment of early stage breast carcinoma: is it consistent with national guidelines? Cancer 83 302–309 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980715)83:2<302::AID-CNCR14>3.3.CO;2-C Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czjt1CktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9669813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. TP Johnson L Ford RB Warnecke et al. (1994) ArticleTitleEffect of a National Cancer Institute Clinical Alert on breast cancer practice patterns J. Clin. Oncol. 12 1783–1788 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA28rmt1Y%3D Occurrence Handle8083701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. BE Hillner TJ Smith CE Desch (2000) ArticleTitleHospital physician volume specialization outcomes cancer treatment importance quality cancer care J. Clin. Oncol. 18 2327–2340 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ptFahsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10829054

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. JA Sosa HM Bowman TA Gordon et al. (1998) ArticleTitleImportance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer Ann. Surg. 228 429–438 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199809000-00016 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhtlymug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9742926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. JD Birkmeyer AL Warshaw SR Finlayson et al. (1999) ArticleTitleRelationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy Surgery 126 178–183 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.1999.98741 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzosVyhsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10455881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. CB Begg LD Cramer WJ Hoskins et al. (1998) ArticleTitleImpact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery JAMA 280 1747–1751 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlslSrsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9842949

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. MG Patti CU Corvera RE Glasgow et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA hospital’s annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2 186–192 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80011-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlvF2mug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9834415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. HN Nguyen HE Averette W Hoskins et al. (1993) ArticleTitleNational survey of ovarian carcinoma: Part V—the impact of physician’s specialty on patients’ survival Cancer 72 3663–3670 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD2szotFU%3D Occurrence Handle8252483

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. GA Porter CL Soskolne WW Yakimets et al. (1998) ArticleTitleSurgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer Ann. Surg. 227 157–167 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199802000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7kslygtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9488510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. CS McCardle D Hole (1991) ArticleTitleImpact of variability among surgeons on postoperative mortality and morbidity and ultimate survival Br. Med. J. 302 1501–1505

    Google Scholar 

  38. AJ Simons R Ker . Groshen et al. (1997) ArticleTitleVariations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseload Dis. Colon Rectum 40 641–646 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3sjns1Y%3D Occurrence Handle9194456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. T Holm H Johansson B Cedermark et al. (1997) ArticleTitleInfluence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy Br. J. Surg. 84 657–663 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02745.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3MrnsFQ%3D Occurrence Handle9171755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. R Sainsbury B Haward L Rider et al. (1995) ArticleTitleInfluence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer Lancet 345 1265–1270 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB28votFM%3D Occurrence Handle7746056

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. CR Gillis DJ Hole (1996) ArticleTitleSurvival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland BMJ 312 145–148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2M3gt1Q%3D Occurrence Handle8563532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. PJ Roohan NA Bickell MS Baptiste et al. (1998) ArticleTitleHospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer Am. J. Public Health 88 454–457 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7nvFCrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9518982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. E Kapiteijn H Putter CJ Velde Particlevan de (2002) ArticleTitleImpact The Netherlands Br. J. Surg. 89 1142–1149 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02196.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjsVWitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12190680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. LJ Lester (1979) ArticleTitleA critical viewpoint by a general surgeon toward reconstructive surgery after mastectomy Clin. Plast. Surg. 6 15–17 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSaC1M%2FktFI%3D Occurrence Handle445970

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. RB Noone TG Frazier GC Noone et al. (1994) ArticleTitleRecurrence of breast carcinoma following immediate reconstruction: a 13-year review Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 93 96–106 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3crivVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8278489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. M Morrow SK Scott HR Menck et al. (2001) ArticleTitleFactors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study J. Am. Coll. Surg. 192 1–8 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00747-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpsVyiuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11192909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. RM Groves (1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs John Wiley and Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Cancer Care Nova Scotia , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

    Geoffrey A. Porter M.D. & Heather McMulkin-Tait M.D

Authors
  1. Geoffrey A. Porter M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather McMulkin-Tait M.D
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey A. Porter M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porter, G., McMulkin-Tait, H. Practice Patterns in Breast Cancer Surgery: Canadian Perspective. World J. Surg. 28, 80–86 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-7040-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-7040-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation