Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Global Marine Protection Targets: How S.M.A.R.T are They?

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global marine protection targets have been criticised for being ecologically irrelevant and often inadequate. However, they may also provide motivation for conservation action. However, no such targets have yet been met, and the health of the marine environment has continued to deteriorate. The Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) recently adopted a new marine protection target, in October, 2010. As such, it is timely to critically assess the potential role of this and other global marine protection targets in conservation and marine resource management. Three targets adopted in the past ten years were assessed using the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timebound) framework. This assessment showed that the targets appear to have evolved to have become ‘SMARTer’ over time, particularly more Specific. The most recent CBD target also appears to be more Achievable than earlier targets. Three broad issues emerged that can inform the potential role, limitations, and challenges associated with global-scale marine protection targets: (i) that SMART target formulation, implementation, monitoring, and revision, is critically underpinned by relevant data and information; (ii) that perceived irrelevance of global targets may be at least partly due to a mismatch between the scale at which the targets were intended to operate, and the scale at which they have sometimes been assessed; and (iii) the primary role of global-scale targets may indeed be psychological rather than ecological. Recent progress indicates some success in this role, which could be built on with further ‘SMARTening’ of targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agardy T (2005) Global marine conservation policy versus site-level implementation: the mismatch of scale and its implications. Marine Ecology Progress Series 300:242–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agardy T, Bridgewater P, Crosby MP, Day J, Dayton PK, Kenchington R, Laffoley D, McConney P, Murray PA, Parks JE, Peau L (2003) Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13(4):353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2006) political science and conservation biology: a dialog of the deaf. Conservation Biology 20(3):681–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alder J (1996) Have tropical marine protected areas worked? An initial anaysis of their success. Coastal Management 24(2):97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantine WJ (1995) Networks of marine reserves are practical and necessary. Science and Management of Protected Areas Association, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma PD, Parrish JK (1999) Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecological Economics 31(2):287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead L (2002) International environmental politics: the limits of green diplomacy. Lynne Reinner Publishers Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse R, Wismar M (2002) Health target programmes and health care services—any link? A comparative and conceptual study (Part 1). Health Policy 59:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter K, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson N, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart S, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2002) Global strategy for plant conservation—follow-up on SBSTTA Recommendation VII/8 Paragraph 2 on the refinement of the 16 draft targets included in the proposed strategy. Convention on Biological Diversity, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2003) Marine and coastal biodiversity: review further elaboration and refinement of the programme of work. Report of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Marine and Coastal Protected Areas. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2004) Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its seventh meeting (Decision VII/30). Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2005) Draft global outcome-oriented targets for the programme of work on marine and coastal biological diversity. Convention on Biological Diversity, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2006) Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its eighth meeting (Decision VIII/15, Annex IV). CBD, Curitiba, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2007) Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Seventh Meeting (Decision VII/28: Protected Areas (Articles 8 (a) to (e))). CBD, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2010) Decision X/2: the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi biodiversity targets. CBD, Nagoya, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2011) Island Biodiversity Commitments, CBD. Accessed 28 Feb 2011 (online): http://www.cbd.int/island/Commitments.shtml

  • Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M, Lysenko I (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 360:443–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day, J., Hockings, M. & Jones, G. (2002) Measuring effectiveness in marine protected areas—principles and practices. Keynote presentation in Aquatic Protected Areas. What works best and how do we know? World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas, Cairns, Australia

  • Department for Environment and Heritage (2006) No species loss: a biodiversity strategy for South Australia 2006–2016: draft for public review. Department for Environment and Heritage, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott L (1998) Global politics of the environment. Macmillan Press Ltd, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez M (2005) Goal-setting. In: Nicholson N, Audia P, Pillutla M (eds) Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of organizational behavior, 2. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 138–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines SD, Gaylord B, Largier JL (2003) Avoiding current oversights in marine reserve design. Ecological Applications 13(1):S32–S46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BS, Warner RR (2003) Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270(1527):1871–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A, Botsford LW (2003) Comparing designs of marine reserves for fisheries and for biodiversity. Ecological Applications 13(1):S65–S70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2000) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing the management of protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N, Parrish J (2004) The World Heritage Management Effectiveness Workbook: revised edition. UNESCO & IUCN, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2003) WPC Recommendation 5.22: building a global system of marine and coastal protected area networks. IUCN, Durban, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson S, Tupper MH, Ridley JM (2002) The three screen doors: can marine “protected” areas be effective? Marine Pollution Bulletin 44(11):1177–1183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2000) Outcomes-based evaluation of management for protected areas—a methodology for incorporating evaluation into management plans. The design and management of forest protected areas: papers presented at the Beyond the Trees conference. 8–11 May 2000, Bangkok, Thailand, WWF Switzerland

  • Jones PJS (2002) Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11(3):197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawohl W, Temple-Bird C, Lenel A, Kaur M (2003) How to manage the finances of your healthcare technology management teams. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher G, Bleakey C, Wells S (1995) Introduction. In: Kelleher G, Bleakey C, Wells S (eds) A global representative system of marine protected areas, The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. The World Bank, The World Conservation Union, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenchington R (2010) Strategic roles of marine protected areas in ecosystem scale conservation. Bulletin of Marine Science 86(2):303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham GP, Locke EA (1991) Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:212–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham GP, Pinder CC (2005) Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology 56:485–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham GP, Yukl GA (1975) A review of research on the application of goal setting in organisations. The Academy of Management Journal 18(4):824–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie H, Ruckelshaus M, Ball IR, Andelman S, Possingham HP (2003) Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13(1):S185–S198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theroy of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist 57(9):705–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J, Palumbi SR, Gaines SD, Andelman SJ (2003) Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(1):S3–S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumb CM, Fowler SL, Atkins SM, Gilliland PM, Vincent MA (2004) The Irish Sea Pilot: developing marine nature conservation objectives for the Irish Sea. DEFRA, Peterborough, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Manghubai S (2001) Interim guidelines for the assessment of management effectiveness of marine protected areas in the western Indian Ocean. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR (1999) Is there a future for coral reef parks in poor tropical countries? Coral Reefs 18:321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1992) The rise and fall of strategic planning: reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. The Free Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncey J, McGinty J (1998) Target setting in special schools. British Journal of Special Education 25(4):173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norse EA, Crowder LB (eds) (2005) Marine conservation biology. Island Press, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR (2003) Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(1):S146–S158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer N, Lipa W, Palmer S, Prank G, Shortridge J, Stuber D (2005) Guidelines on climate data management version 5.0. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollnac RB, Cawford BR, Gorospe MLG (2001) Discovering factors that influence the success of community-based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines. Ocean & Coastal Management 44:683–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy RS, Parks JE, Watson LM (2004) How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area management effectiveness. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vane-Wright RI, Williams PH (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8(4):124–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Cowling RM, Rouget M (2003) Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112(1–2):99–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice J, Trujillo V, Jennings S, Hylland K, Hagstrom O, Astudillo A, Jensen JN (2005) Guidance on the application of the ecosystem approach to management of human activities in the European Human Environment. ICES, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (2005) Millennium development goals: are international targets now more credible? Journal of International Development 17(1):113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffman M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli DA (1976) Public planning and political strategy. Long Range Planning IX(2):75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routhe AS, Jones RE, Feldman DL (2005) Using theory to understand public support for collective actions that impact the environment: alleviating water supply problems in a nonarid biome. Social Science Quarterly 86(4):874–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (2005) Biodiversity and environmental philosophy: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Pressey RL, Faith DP, Margules CR, Fuller T, Stoms DM, Moffett A, Wilson KA, Williams KJ, Williams PH, Andelman S (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:123–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE Jr (2006) Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conservation Biology 20(3):702–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon M, Van Jaarsveld AS, Biggs HC, Knight MH (2003) Conservation targets for viable species assemblages? Biodiversity and Conservation 12(12):2435–2441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Sanjayan MA (1998) Conservation targets: do they help? Science 279(5359):2060–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding M, Wood L, Fitzgerald C, Gjerde KM (2010) The 10% target: where do we stand? In: Toropova C, Meliane I, Laffoley D, Matthews E, Spalding M (eds) Global ocean protection: present status and future possibilities. Agence des Aires Marines Protégées, Brest, France; IUCN WCPA, Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC and New York, USA; UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK; TNC, Arlington, USA; UNU, Tokyo, Japan; WCS, New York, USA, pp 25–40

  • Stark, J. (2004) Implementing marine protected areas policy: lessons from Canada and Australia. MSc thesis, School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada

  • Staub F, Hatziolos M (2004) Score card to assess progress in achieving management effectiveness goals for marine protected areas. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumaila UR, Armstrong CW (2006) Distributional and efficiency effects of marine protected areas: a study of the Northeast Atlantic cod fishery. Land Economics 82(3):321–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumaila UR, Guénette S, Alder J, Chuenpagdee R (2000) Addressing ecosystem effects of fishing using marine protected areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57(3):752–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svancara LK, Brannon R, Scott JM, Groves CR, Noss RF, Pressey B (2005) Policy-driven vs. evidence-based conservation: a review of political targets and biological needs. Bioscience 55:989–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RN (1976) Psychological aspects of planning. Long Range Planning IX(2):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RK (2003) Health services planning. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treasury HM (2003) The Green Book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. The Stationary Office, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker G (2005) A review of biodiversity conservation performance measures. Earthwatch Institute, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2002) Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August–4th September 2002. United Nations, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2006) The Millennium Development Goals Report 2006. United Nations, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • van Herten LM, Gunning-Schepers LJ (2000) Targets as a tool in health policy Part I: lessons learned. Health Policy 52:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner LD, Ross JV, Possingham H (2006) Catastrophe management and inter-reserve distance for marine reserve networks. Ecological Modelling 201(1):82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley SF, White AT (2003) Influence of social, management and enforcement factors on the long-term ecological effects of marine sanctuaries. Environmental Conservation 30(4):388–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters C (2000) Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be? Bulletin of Marine Science 66(3):745–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells S, Mangubhai S (2004) A workbook for assessing management effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Western Indian Ocean. IUCN Eastern African Regional Programme, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma YF, Nudds TD (2006) Conservation targets for viable species assemblages in Canada: are percentage targets appropriate? Biodiversity and Conservation 15(14):4555–4567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L.J. (2007) The global network of marine protected areas: developing baselines and identifying priorities. PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Wood LJ, Fish L, Laughren J, Pauly D (2008) Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action. Oryx 42(3):340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was initially conducted as part of the Sea Around Us Project, an activity funded and initiated by the Pew Charitable Trusts. Funding was also provided by WWF. I thank Peter Herkenrath, UNEP-WCMC, and Andy Thorpe, University of Portsmouth for comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Rd, Cambridge, UK, CB3 0DL

    Louisa Wood

  2. UBC Fisheries Centre, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), The University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4

    Louisa Wood

Authors
  1. Louisa Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louisa Wood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, L. Global Marine Protection Targets: How S.M.A.R.T are They?. Environmental Management 47, 525–535 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9668-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9668-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation