Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gigantomasty: Treatment with a Short Vertical Scar

  • Original
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

During the past 15 years, reduction mammoplasty with a short vertical scar has become increasingly common in the world of plastic surgery. Still, the indication for this technique often is limited to smaller reduction weights, so that the inverted T-scar techniques have yet to be regarded as the gold standard for excessive breast hypertrophy.

Methods

In the authors’ department, their own modification of vertical scar reduction mammoplasty, based on the techniques of C. Lassus, G. Maillard, and M. Lejour, has been performed since 1990. During the past 10 years, the authors have used it for all breast sizes. To investigate the safety and the results for patients with very large breast volumes (gigantomasty involving at least ≥1,000 g of excised tissue per one side), this study retrospectively evaluated 25 women with a mean age of 43.1 ± 11.2 years who underwent surgery from January 2002 to June 2003. A protocol was used to record patient satisfaction and complaints and to quantify the final result objectively.

Results

The average resection weight for the 25 women was 1,227 ± 300 g (maximum, 2,300 g) on the right side and 1,218 ± 343 g (maximum, 2,100 g) on the left side. The sternal notch-to-nipple distance was reduced from 37.1 ± 4 cm to 23.4 ± 2.1 cm on the right side and from 37.4 ± 3.5 cm to 24 ± 2 cm on the left side. The brassiere size was reduced by about three cup sizes on the average. During an average follow-up period of 2 years (n = 15), patient satisfaction was high, with good acceptance of the breast shape and a low rate of major complications (12%).

Conclusion

The results suggest that the authors’ modified vertical scar technique can be used successfully for all dimensions of reduction mammoplasty regardless of breast weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dartigues L (1925) Traitement chirurgical du prolapsus mammaire. Arch Franco Belg Chir 28:313

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arie G (1957) Una nueva tecnica de mastoplastia. Rev Latinoam Cir Plast 3:23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Strömbeck JO (1971) Reduction mammaplasty. Surg Clin North Am 51:453–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strömbeck JO (1983) Reduction mammoplasty: Some observations and reflections. Aesth Plast Surg 7:249–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McKissock PK (1972)Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:245–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lassus C (1986) Reduction mammaplasty with short inframammary scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:680–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maillard GF (1986) A Z-mammaplasty with minimal scarring. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:66–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marchac D (1986) Reduction mammaplasty with short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:859–860

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lejour M (1993) Vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:985–986, erratum in Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1116, 1994

  10. Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: Update and appraisal of late results. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:771–781, discussion 782–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pallua N, Ermisch C (2003) “I” becomes “L”: Modification of vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1860–1870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Poell JG (2004) Vertical reduction mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 28:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giovanoli P, Meuli-Simmen C, Meyer VE, Frey M (1999) Which technique for which breast? A prospective study of different techniques of reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 52:52–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beer GM, Spicher I, Cierpka KA, Meyer VE (2004) Benefits and pitfalls of vertical scar breast reduction (review). Br J Plast Surg 57:12–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Spector JA, Kleinerman R, Culliford AT IV, Karp NS (2006) The vertical reduction mammaplasty: A prospective analysis of patient outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:374–381, discussion 382–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lista F, Ahmad J (2006) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: A 15-year experience including a review of 250 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2152–2165, discussion 2166–2169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hefter W, Elvenes OP (2006) Role of the size of the pedicle in reduction mammaplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 40:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L (2003) Vertical versus Wise pattern breast reduction: Patient satisfaction, revision rates, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1573–1578, discussion 1579–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hidalgo DA (1999) Improving safety and aesthetic results in inverted T scar breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:874–886, discussion 887–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gerzenshtein J, Oswald T, McCluskey P, Caplan J, Angel MF (2005) Avoiding free nipple grafting with the inferior pedicle technique. Ann Plast Surg 55:245–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Misirlioglu A, Akoz T (2005) Familial severe gigantomastia and reduction with the free nipple graft vertical mammoplasty technique: Report of two cases. Aesth Plast Surg 29:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Wingerden JJ (2006) Avoiding free nipple grafting in gigantomastia with the inferior pedicle technique. Ann Plast Surg 56:465–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker SB, Burkey BA, Thornton P, LaRossa D (2001) Juvenile gigantomastia: Presentation of four cases and review of the literature (review). Ann Plast Surg 46:517–525, discussion 525–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lacerna M, Spears J, Mitra A, Medina C, McCampbell E, Kiran R, Mitra A (2005) Avoiding free nipple grafts during reduction mammaplasty in patients with gigantomastia. Ann Plast Surg 55:21–24, discussion 24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Sorokin ES (2003) Recurrent mammary hyperplasia: Current concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:387–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hidalgo DA (2005) Vertical mammaplasty. 115:1179–1197, discussion 1198–1199

  27. Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: Shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:748–759, discussion 760–763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Prantl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heine, N., Eisenmann-Klein, M. & Prantl, L. Gigantomasty: Treatment with a Short Vertical Scar. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 41–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9005-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9005-x

Keywords

Navigation