Skip to main content
Log in

Infections of Breast Implants in Aesthetic Breast Augmentations: A Single-Center Review of 3,002 Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A large retrospective analysis examined primary aesthetic breast augmentations to find specific factors that could favor or counteract the occurrence of infections.

Methods

Data were collected from the personal databases of two different surgeons at the Crown House Hospital, Oldbury, Birmingham, United Kingdom, from January 1999 to December 2004. All the patients who received primary aesthetic breast augmentation with or without associated mastopexy were recorded.

Results

A total of 3,002 women were reviewed. Infections were experienced by 33 patients (1.1%). The analysis showed that Mentor prostheses and local antibiotics both were protective against the occurrence of infections (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the use of drains significantly increased the risk fivefold (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The incidence of infections in aesthetic breast augmentations is 1.1%, and Mentor prostheses, antibiotics in the pocket, and the use of drains seem associated with their occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong RW, Berkowitz RL, Bolding F: Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 23:284–288, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Capozzi A: Clinical experience with Heyer-Schulte inflatable implants in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:772–778, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Capozzi A, Pennisi VR: Clinical experience with polyurethane-covered gel-filled mammary prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:512–520, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clegg HW, Bertagnoll P, Hightower AW, et al.: Mammaplasty-associated mycobacterial infection: a survey of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 72:165–169, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW: The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cronin TD, Greenberg RL: Our experiences with the silastic gel breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 46:1–7, 1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Cholnoky T: Augmentation mammaplasty. Survey of complications in 10,941 patients by 265 surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:573–577, 1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eyssen JE, von Werssowetz AJ, Middleton GD: Reconstruction of the breast using polyurethane-coated prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 415–421, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, et al.: Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 336: 677–682, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, et al.: A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herman D, Wilk A, Meyer C, et al.: Our experience of infectious risk in prosthetic breast surgery. Agressologie 33: 188–190, 1992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hester TR Jr, Nahai F, Bostwick J, et al.: A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammoplasty, and breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 15: 569–585, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jabaley ME, Das SK: Late breast pain following reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 78: 390–395, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, et al.: Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 112: 467–476, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D: Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 94–106, 2005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rheingold LM, Yoo RP, Courtiss EH: Experience with 326 inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 93: 118–122, 1994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schatten WE: Reconstruction of breasts following mastectomy with polyurethane-covered, gel-filled prostheses. Ann Plast Surg 12: 147–156, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlenker JD, Bueno RA, Ricketson G, et al.: Loss of silicone implants after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 62: 853–861, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Slade CL: Subcutaneous mastectomy: Acute complications and long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 84–90, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vandeweyer E, Deraemaecker R, Nogaret JM, et al.: Immediate breast reconstruction with implants and adjuvant chemotherapy: A good option? Acta Chir Belg 103: 98–101, 2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gravante M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araco, A., Gravante, G., Araco, F. et al. Infections of Breast Implants in Aesthetic Breast Augmentations: A Single-Center Review of 3,002 Patients. Aesth Plast Surg 31, 325–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0156-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0156-y

Keywords

Navigation