Abstract
Background
A large retrospective analysis examined primary aesthetic breast augmentations to find specific factors that could favor or counteract the occurrence of infections.
Methods
Data were collected from the personal databases of two different surgeons at the Crown House Hospital, Oldbury, Birmingham, United Kingdom, from January 1999 to December 2004. All the patients who received primary aesthetic breast augmentation with or without associated mastopexy were recorded.
Results
A total of 3,002 women were reviewed. Infections were experienced by 33 patients (1.1%). The analysis showed that Mentor prostheses and local antibiotics both were protective against the occurrence of infections (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the use of drains significantly increased the risk fivefold (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The incidence of infections in aesthetic breast augmentations is 1.1%, and Mentor prostheses, antibiotics in the pocket, and the use of drains seem associated with their occurrence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong RW, Berkowitz RL, Bolding F: Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 23:284–288, 1989
Capozzi A: Clinical experience with Heyer-Schulte inflatable implants in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:772–778, 1986
Capozzi A, Pennisi VR: Clinical experience with polyurethane-covered gel-filled mammary prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:512–520, 1981
Clegg HW, Bertagnoll P, Hightower AW, et al.: Mammaplasty-associated mycobacterial infection: a survey of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 72:165–169, 1983
Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW: The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816, 1979
Cronin TD, Greenberg RL: Our experiences with the silastic gel breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 46:1–7, 1970
De Cholnoky T: Augmentation mammaplasty. Survey of complications in 10,941 patients by 265 surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:573–577, 1970
Eyssen JE, von Werssowetz AJ, Middleton GD: Reconstruction of the breast using polyurethane-coated prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 415–421, 1984
Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, et al.: Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 336: 677–682, 1997
Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, et al.: A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767, 2006
Herman D, Wilk A, Meyer C, et al.: Our experience of infectious risk in prosthetic breast surgery. Agressologie 33: 188–190, 1992
Hester TR Jr, Nahai F, Bostwick J, et al.: A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammoplasty, and breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 15: 569–585, 1988
Jabaley ME, Das SK: Late breast pain following reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 78: 390–395, 1986
Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, et al.: Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 112: 467–476, 2003
Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D: Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 94–106, 2005
Rheingold LM, Yoo RP, Courtiss EH: Experience with 326 inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 93: 118–122, 1994
Schatten WE: Reconstruction of breasts following mastectomy with polyurethane-covered, gel-filled prostheses. Ann Plast Surg 12: 147–156, 1984
Schlenker JD, Bueno RA, Ricketson G, et al.: Loss of silicone implants after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 62: 853–861, 1978
Slade CL: Subcutaneous mastectomy: Acute complications and long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 84–90, 1984
Vandeweyer E, Deraemaecker R, Nogaret JM, et al.: Immediate breast reconstruction with implants and adjuvant chemotherapy: A good option? Acta Chir Belg 103: 98–101, 2003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Araco, A., Gravante, G., Araco, F. et al. Infections of Breast Implants in Aesthetic Breast Augmentations: A Single-Center Review of 3,002 Patients. Aesth Plast Surg 31, 325–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0156-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0156-y