Skip to main content
Log in

The functional significance of infanticide in a population of California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Naturally-occurring infanticide was observed in a population of California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). In four seasons, 40 infanticides were observed. All victims were post-emergent pups. Of 37 killings in which the killer was sexed 36 were by females. All infanticidal females were mothers at the time they killed, but in no case was a mother seen to kill or harm her own young. The victim was cannibalized in 22 cases and taken immediately into the killer’s burrow in 16 others. In no case did killers gain access to the victimized mother’s burrow or territory and female pups were not killed preferentially over males. In light of evolutionary explanations, infanticide in this population may best fit the resource exploitation hypothesis, in which killers commit infanticide to gain a nutritional benefit. Resource competition is a possible auxiliary explanation, since any time a female kills unrelated young she is eliminating possible competitors to her own offspring. This behavior could confer a fitness advantage on killers or it could be an adaptively neutral, alternative feeding strategy. More data are necessary to distinguish between these hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 26 January 1995/Accepted after revision: 9 September 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trulio, L. The functional significance of infanticide in a population of California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38, 97–103 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050222

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050222

Navigation