Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to investigate the functional and anatomical outcome after a new rectovaginal fascial plication technique in patients with rectoceles or rectal pockets and obstructed defecation.

Methods

In a prospective study 54 of 87 patients were examined pre- and postoperatively using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system of the International Continence Society (ICS). Bowel and protrusion symptoms as well as quality of life (QOL) were evaluated by a standardized questionnaire. Surgical therapy consisted of a posterior vaginal wall incision in the midline, a dissection of the vaginal epithelium from the underlying rectovaginal fascia while the rectocele was brought under tension by the index finger in the rectum. Under rectal digital control the surgically exposed rectovaginal fascia was sutured in a cranio-caudal fashion with sagittally positioned running absorbable sutures followed by a careful reapproximation of the laterally separated perineal body in the midline.

Results

Obstructed defecation symptoms were cured or improved in 72.2 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 59.1–82.4]. Anatomical cure rate was 92.1 % (95 % CI 79.2–97.3) and protrusion symptoms were resolved in 73.6 % (95 % CI 58.0–85.0). Of the patients who had intercourse, 5.2 % reported de novo dyspareunia postoperatively; in none of these patients was an anatomical cause found. There were no major intra- or postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Sagittal rectovaginal fascial plication in symptomatic rectoceles or functionally relevant rectal pockets is associated with a satisfactory anatomical and functional cure rate without impacting sexual function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:369–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lukacz ES, Luber KM (2002) Rectocele repair: when and how? Curr Urol Rep 3:418–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DeLancey JO (1999) Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:815–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson AC (1995) The anatomic defects in rectocele and enterocele. J Pelvic Surg 1:214–221

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson AC (1993) The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:976–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM (2004) Pelvic symptoms im women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 104:982–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR (2000) Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1610–1615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:96–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nichols DH, Randall CL (1996) Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. In: Nichols DH, Randall CL (eds) Vaginal surgery, 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 257–289

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:82–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Silva WA, Karram MM (2001) Rectocele–anatomic and functional repair. In: Cardozo L, Staskin DR (eds) Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 1035–1051

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, Goldberg R (2001) Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357–1364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand P (2005) Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 105:314–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milani AL, Withagen MI, Schweitzer KJ, Janszen EW, Vierhout ME (2010) Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome? Int Urogynecol J 21:623–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maher C, Baessler K (2005) Surgical management of posterior vaginal prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:84–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goh JTW, Dwyer PL (2001) Effectiveness and safety of polypropylene mesh in vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:90

    Google Scholar 

  18. FDA Safety Communication (13 July 2011) Update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm262435.htm

  19. Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Påhlman L (1996) Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum 39:1296–1302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Khubchandani IT, Clancy JP, Rosen L, Riether RD, Stasik JJ (1997) Endorectal repair of rectocele revisited. Br J Surg 84:89–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR (2000) Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1556–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lim M, Lew-Gor S, Darby Y, Brookes N, Scadding G, Lund VJ (2007) The relationship between subjective assessment instruments in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 45:144–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM (1999) The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1353–1359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WM (2003) Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:320–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Glavind K, Madsen H (2000) A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:145–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1360–1364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD (2006) Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1762–1771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mellgren A, Anzén B, Nilsson BY, Johansson C, Dolk A, Gillgren P, Bremmer S, Holmström B (1995) Results of rectocele repair. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Baessler K, Schluter PJ (2004) Midline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol 104:685–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

    Karin Schmidlin-Enderli & Bernhard Schuessler

Authors
  1. Karin Schmidlin-Enderli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernhard Schuessler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Schmidlin-Enderli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidlin-Enderli, K., Schuessler, B. A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study. Int Urogynecol J 24, 613–619 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1911-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1911-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation