Skip to main content
Log in

The efficacy comparison of on-demand boluses with and without basal infusion of 0.1 % bupivacaine via perineural femoral catheter after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Optimal postoperative analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament repair remains challenging. The objective of this prospective experimental clinical study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of two infusion regimens of 0.1 % bupivacaine administered via perineural femoral catheter.

Methods

Forty adult ASA I and II patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were enrolled. Surgery was performed under spinal anesthesia combined with femoral nerve block. A perineural femoral catheter was connected to the patient controlled analgesia infusion pump filled with 0.1 % bupivacaine for postoperative pain control. Subjects were assigned to one of two groups according to the bupivacaine infusion regimen: (1) 5 mL/h basal infusion with on-demand 5 mL boluses and 30-min refractive periods, and (2) only on-demand 5 mL boluses and 15-min refractive periods. Quality of postoperative analgesia, adjunctive analgesic consumption, and overall patient satisfaction were recorded for 48 h.

Results

Pain control was better in Group I on the day of surgery (P = 0.001) and on the first postoperative day at rest and during mobilization (P = 0.02 and P = 0.009). On the second postoperative day, only pain control during mobilization was better in Group I (P = 0.047). Adjunctive analgesic consumption and patient satisfaction were similar.

Conclusion

Perineural femoral infusion of on-demand 5 mL boluses of 0.1 % bupivacaine combined with 5 mL/h basal infusion was more efficient than on-demand regimen alone for postoperative pain management after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament of the knee.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrington MJ, Watts SA, Gledhill SR, Gledhill SR, Thomas RD, Said SA, Synder GL, Tay VS, Jamrozik K (2009) Preliminary results of the Australasian regional anesthesia collaboration. A prospective audit of more than 7000 peripheral nerve and plexus blocks for neurologic and other complications. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34(6):534–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell A, McCormick M, McKinlay K, Scott NB (2008) Epidural vs lumbar plexus infusions following total knee arthroplasty: randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 25(6):502–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chelly JE, Ben-David B, Williams BA, Kentor ML (2003) Anesthesia and postoperative analgesia: outcomes following orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 26(8 Suppl):s865–s871

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chelly JE (2003) Anesthesie pour la chirurgie orthopedique ambulatoire. Prat Anesth Reanim 7(1):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  5. Contreras-Domínguez VA, Carbonell-Bellolio PE, Ojeda-Greciet AC, Sanzana ES (2007) Patient controlled analgesia reduces the consumption of bupivacaine in femoral nerve block for the treatment of postoperative pain after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Rev Bras Anestesiol 57(4):356–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Contreras-Dominguez VA, Carbonell-Bellolioa PE, Ojeda-Greciet AC, Sanzana ES (2006) Femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of 2 concentrations of bupivacaine with clonidine in 3 modes of administration. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 53(10):626–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuvillon P, Ripart J, Lalourcey L, Veyrat E, L’Hermite J, Boisson C, Thouabtia E, Eledjam JJ (2001) The continuous femoral nerve block catheter for postoperative analgesia: bacterial colonization, infectious rate and adverse effects. Anesth Analg 93(4):1045–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dauri M, Polzoni M, Fabbi E, Sidiropoulou T, Servetti S, Coniglione F, Mariani P, Sabato AF (2003) Comparison of epidural, continuous femoral block and intraarticular analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47(1):20–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Le-Wendling L, Enneking FK (2008) Continuous peripheral nerve blockade for postoperative analgesia. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 21(5):602–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Momeni M, Crucitti M, De Kock M (2007) Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(4):241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlin DJ, Chen C, Penazola DA, Polissar NL, Buckley FP (2002) Pain as a factor complicating recovery and discharge after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 95:627–634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ripart J (2003) Blocks nerveux peripheriques: analgesie, gestion des catheters. Prat Anesth Reanim 7(1S):9–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singelyn FJ, Gouverneur JM (2000) Extended “three-in-one” block after total knee arthroplasty: continuous versus patient-controlled techniques. Anesth Analg 91(1):176–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Souron V (2003) Systemes pout l’analgesie continue par catheter nerveux a domicile. Prat Anesth Reanim 7(4):281–283

    Google Scholar 

  15. Williams BA, Kentor ML, Vogt MT, Irrgang JJ, Bottegal MT, West RV, Harner CD, Fu FH, Williams JP (2006) Reduction of verbal pain scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-day continuous femoral nerve block: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology 104(2):315–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams BA, Kentor ML, Vogt MT, Vogt WB, Coley KC, Williams JP, Roberts MS, Chelly JE, Harner CD, Fu FH (2004) Economics of nerve block pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: potential hospital cost savings via associated post anaesthesia care unit bypass and same-day discharge. Anesthesiology 100(3):697–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All of the authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saule Svediene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svediene, S., Andrijauskas, A., Ivaskevicius, J. et al. The efficacy comparison of on-demand boluses with and without basal infusion of 0.1 % bupivacaine via perineural femoral catheter after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 641–645 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1971-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1971-0

Keywords

Navigation