Skip to main content
Log in

Covering properties of ideals

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elekes proved that any infinite-fold cover of a σ-finite measure space by a sequence of measurable sets has a subsequence with the same property such that the set of indices of this subsequence has density zero. Applying this theorem he gave a new proof for the random-indestructibility of the density zero ideal. He asked about other variants of this theorem concerning I-almost everywhere infinite-fold covers of Polish spaces where I is a σ-ideal on the space and the set of indices of the required subsequence should be in a fixed ideal \({{\mathcal{J}}}\) on ω. We introduce the notion of the \({{\mathcal{J}}}\) -covering property of a pair \({({\mathcal{A}}, I)}\) where \({{\mathcal{A}}}\) is a σ-algebra on a set X and \({{I \subseteq \mathcal{P}(X)}}\) is an ideal. We present some counterexamples, discuss the category case and the Fubini product of the null ideal \({\mathcal{N}}\) and the meager ideal \({\mathcal{M}}\) . We investigate connections between this property and forcing-indestructibility of ideals. We show that the family of all Borel ideals \({{\mathcal{J}}}\) on ω such that \({\mathcal{M}}\) has the \({{\mathcal{J}}}\) -covering property consists exactly of non weak Q-ideals. We also study the existence of smallest elements, with respect to Katětov–Blass order, in the family of those ideals \({\mathcal{J}}\) on ω such that \({\mathcal{N}}\) or \({\mathcal{M}}\) has the \({\mathcal{J}}\) -covering property. Furthermore, we prove a general result about the cases when the covering property “strongly” fails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balcerzak M.: Can ideals without ccc be interesting?. Topol. Appl. 55, 251–260 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Balcerzak M., Gła̧b S.: Measure-category properties of Borel plane sets and Borel functions of two variables. Acta Math. Hung. 126, 241–252 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balcerzak M., Rosłanowski A.: On Mycielski ideals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 110, 243–250 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbarski P., Filipow R., Mro zek N., Szuca P.: Uniform density u and I u -covergence on a big set. Math. Commun. 16(1), 125–130 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartoszewicz A., Filipczak M., Natkaniec T.: On Smital properties. Topol. Appl. 158, 2066–2075 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartoszynski T., Judah H.: Set Theory: On the Structure of the Real Line. A.K. Peters, Natick (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Brendle J., Yatabe S.: Forcing indestructibility of MAD families. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 132(2–3), 271–312 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Elekes, M.: A covering theorem and the random-indesctructibility of the density zero ideal. Real Anal. Exch. 37(1), 55–60 (2011–2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hrušák M., Zapletal J.: Forcing with qoutients. Arch. Math. Logic 47, 719–739 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kechris A.S.: Classical Descriptive Set Theory. Springer, New York (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirchheim, B.: Typical approximately continuous functions are surprisingly thick. Real Anal. Exch. 18(1), 55–62 (1992–1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laflamme, C.: Filter games and combinatorial properties of strategies. Contemp. Math. Am. Math. Soc. 192, 51–67 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meza-Alcántara, D.: Ideals and filters on countable sets. PhD thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma México, México (2009)

  14. Miller A.W.: There are no Q-points in Laver’s model for the Borel conjecture. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 78(1), 103–106 (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Solecki S.: Analytic ideals and their applications. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 99, 51–72 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Talagrand M.: Compacts de fonctions mesurables et filtres non mesurables. Studia Mathematica 67(1), 13–43 (1980)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zajiček L.: On σ-porous sets and Borel sets. Topol. Appl. 33, 99–103 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zapletal J.: Forcing Idealized, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 174. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barnabás Farkas.

Additional information

The first author was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education Grant No. N N201 414939 (2010–2013); the second author was supported by Hungarian National Foundation for Scientific Research grant nos. 68262, 83726 and 77476; the third author was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education Grant No. IP2011 014671 (2012–2014).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balcerzak, M., Farkas, B. & Gła̧b, S. Covering properties of ideals. Arch. Math. Logic 52, 279–294 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-012-0316-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-012-0316-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (1991)

Navigation