Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cerebral Whipple’s Disease Diagnosed Using PCR

The First Case Reported from Greece

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Whipple’s disease (WD) is a rare multisystemic bacterial infection, with variable clinical manifestations occasionally involving the central nervous system. As the cultivation of the etiologic agent, Tropheryma whippelii, is difficult, a laboratory diagnosis is usually based on histological methods. In the last few years, molecular detection of the bacterial 16SrRNA genes by PCR, with 2 primer sets, has greatly contributed to the ability of clinicians to diagnose this disease. We present a cerebral case of WD in a 48-year-old male, successfully diagnosed using PCR with T. whippelii in the blood and feces. As far as we know this is the first case reported from Greece.

Methods: For the diagnosis of WD, histological examination of duodenum biopsy for diastase-resistant, non-acid fast, periodic acid Schiff (PAS)-positive inclusions in macrophages, and molecular detection of the 16SrRNA genes of T. whippelii by PCR in cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and feces, were performed.

Results: The histological detection was negative. PCR results were positive in the blood and feces of the patient and negative in the cerebrospinal fluid. Seven months after the onset of antimicrobial therapy, PCR was negative in all three clinical specimens.

Conclusions: The application of PCR proved to be an invaluable tool for the recognition, differential diagnosis and early initiation of antimicrobial therapy for the patient diagnosed with WD, a disease which is generally fatal if it remains untreated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Misbah SA, Mapstone NP. Whipple’s disease revisited. J Clin Pathol 2000; 53: 750–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodgson HJF. Whipple’s disease. In: Weatherall DJ, Ledingham JGG, Warrell DA, editors. Oxford textbook of medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996: 1923–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marbet U, Staldler GA, Gyr KE. Whipple’s disease: a multisystemic disease with changing presentation. Dig Dis 1986; 4: 119–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Louis ED, Lynch T, Kaufmann P, et al. Diagnostic guidelines in central nervous system Whipple’s disease. Ann Neurol 1996; 40: 561–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson M. Neurology of Whipple’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 2–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Raoult D, Birg MI, La Scola B, et al. Cultivation of the bacillus of the Whipple’s disease. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 620–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoedon G, Goldenberger D, Forrer R, et al. Deactivation of macrophages with interleukin-4 is the key to the isolation of Tropheryma whippelii. J Infect Dis 1997; 176: 672–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobbins WO. The diagnosis of Whipple’s disease. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 390–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mainwald M, von Herbay A, Lepp PW, et al. Organisation, structure and viability of the rRNA operon of the Whipple’s disease bacterium (Tropheryma whippelii). J Bacteriol 2000; 182: 3292–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dauga G, Miras I, Grimont PA. Strategy for detection and identification of bacteriabased on 16S rRNA genes in suspected cases of Whipple’s disease. J Med Microbiol 1997; 46: 340–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rickman LS, Freeman WR, Green WR, et al. Brief report: uveitis caused by Tropheryma whippelii (Whipple’s bacillus). N Engl J Med 1995; 322: 363–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mailbach RC, Dutly F, Altwegg M. Detection of Tropheryma whipplei DNA using a target capture method. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 2466–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gras E, Matias-Guiu X, Garcia A, et al. PCR analysis in the pathological diagnosis of Whipple’s disease: emphasis on extraintestinal involvement or atypical morphological features. J Pathol 1999; 188: 318–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramzann NN, Loftus E, Burgart LJ, et al. Diagnosis and monitoring of Whipple’s disease by polymerase chain reaction. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 520–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maiwald M, Schuhmacher F, Ditton HJ, et al. Environmental occurrence of the Whipple’s disease bacterium (Tropheryma whippelii). Appl Environ Microbiol 1998; 64: 760–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Street S, Donoghue HD, Neild GH. Tropheryma whippelii DNA in saliva of healthy people. Lancet 1999; 354: 1178–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Misbah SA, Stirzaker D, Ozols B, et al. Anonymous survey of blood donors by polymerase chain reaction for Tropheryma whippelii [letter]. Q J Med 1999; 92: 61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have provided no information on sources of funding or on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review/study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papadopoulou, M., Rentzos, M., Nicolaou, C. et al. Cerebral Whipple’s Disease Diagnosed Using PCR. CNS Drugs 7, 209–211 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260040

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260040

Keywords

Navigation