Skip to main content
Log in

Correction factors used for estimating prey biomass in the diet of American minkMustela vison

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feeding experiment on nine feral minkMustela vison Schreber, 1777 was carried out to find differences in digestibility of particular prey types. The values of correction factors (CF), which show the ratio between consumed prey biomass and undigested remains, were calculated for seven food types. The experiment revealed that results obtained by commonly used percentage of occurrence methods differed from the real intake of food. Food types which were intensively digested were underestimated by percentage of occurrence methods and prey which had hardly digestive elements of their body were overestimated. The calculated values of CF are as follows: crayfish — 14.8, fish — 30.8, frog — 61.3, small passerine bird — 17.2, chicken — 41.3, rodent — 17.3, egg — 687.5. The variability in CF values did not depend on mink individuals but could be explained by the mean weight of prey items eaten by mink. The positive correlation between the prey size and its digestibility was recorded for crayfish, fish and chicken. The biomass of frog, passerine and rodent remains was not related to the body mass of eaten prey. The use of evaluated correction factors enables more accurate estimates of the food composition of wild living mustelids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akande M. 1972. The food of feral mink (Mustela vison) in Scotland. Journal of Zoology, London 167: 475–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanin P. 1981. The diet of the otter and its relations with the feral mink in two areas of southwest England. Acta Theriologica 26: 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanin P. R. F. and Linn I. 1980. The diet of the feral mink (Mustela vison) in southwest Britain. Journal of Zoology, London 192: 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day M. G. and Linn I. 1972. The food of the feral minkMustela vison in England and Wales. Journal of Zoology, London 167: 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunstone N. and Birks J. D. S. 1987. The feeding ecology of mink (Mustela vison) in coastal habitat. Journal of Zoology, London 212: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S. 1967. Food habits of fish-otter (Lutra lutra L.) in south Swedish habitats. Viltrevy 4: 371–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairley J. S., Ward D. P. and Smal C. M. 1987. Correction factors and mink feaces. Irish Naturalists Journal 22: 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerell R. 1968. Food habits of the mink,Mustela vison Schreb., in Sweden. Viltrevy 5: 119–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goszczyński J. 1974. Studies on the food of foxes. Acta Theriologica 19: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberg O. 1982. Correction factors for important prey categories in the diet of domestic cats. Acta Theriologica 27: 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie J. D. 1959. The estimation of the food of foxes. The Journal of Wildlife Management 33: 224–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodé T. 1990. The diet of a small carnivore: the polecat (Mustela putorius) in the west of France. Gibier Faune Sauvage 7: 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger M., Pascal M. and Pruničre P. 1990. Correction factors to quantify polecat (Mustela putorius L.) diets. Gibier Faune Sauvage 7: 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidorovich V. E., Macdonald D. W., Pikulik M. M. and Kruuk H. 2001. Individual feeding specialization in the European mink,Mustela lutreola and the American mink,M. vison in north-eastern Belarus. Folia Zoologica 50: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward D. P., Smal C. M. and Fairley J. S. 1986. The food of minkMustela vison in the Irish Midlands. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 86 B: 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber D. 1989. The diet of polecats (Mustela putorius L.) in Switzerland. Zeitschrift für Süugetierkunde 54: 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise M. H. 1980. The use of fish vertebrae in scats for estimating prey size of otters and mink. Journal of Zoology, London 192: 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise M. H., Linn I. J. and Kennedy C. R. 1981. A comparison of the feeding biology of minkMustela vison and otterLutra lutra. Journal of Zoology, London 195: 181–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Brzeziński.

Additional information

Associate Editor was Andrzej Zalewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brzeziński, M., Marzec, M. Correction factors used for estimating prey biomass in the diet of American minkMustela vison . Acta Theriol 48, 247–254 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194164

Key words

Navigation