Skip to main content
Log in

The implementation of inclusive education in South Africa after ten years of democracy

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inclusive education in South Africa has not been promoted as simply one more option for education but as an educational strategy that can contribute to a democratic society. After the end of the Apartheid era the new democratic government committed itself to the transformation of education and key policy documents and legislation stress the principle of education as a basic human right as enshrined in the Constitution. White Paper 6: Special Needs Education, building an inclusive education and training system (2001) provides a framework for systemic change for the development of inclusive education. As a philosophy, the concept of inclusive education in the South African context embraces the democratic values of equality and human rights and the recognition of diversity. Research however indicates that multifaceted societal changes, encompassing educational reforms and contextual changes, including the management of diversity in schools, have had a negative impact on the implementation of inclusive education. After ten year of democracy, the enduring tension between changing the structure of education and changing the process of education is still influencing progress. Enhancing the recognition and acceptance of the basic rights of all South African children to be accommodated in inclusive school communities therefore remains a challenge.

Résumé

l’éducation incluse* en Afrique du Sud n’a pas été promue comme une autre option pour l’éducation, mais plutôt comme une stratégie scolaire qui peut contribuer ⦏ une société démocratique. Après l’Apartheid, le gouvernement démocratique s’est engagé à la transformation de l’éducation. Les documents politiques clés et la législation soulignent le principe de l’éducation comme un droit de l’homme fondamental, préservé dans la Constitution. Le White Paper 6: Special Needs Education, building an inclusive éducation and training system (2001) structure le changement systémique pour le développement de l’éducation incluse. Comme philosophie, l’éducation incluse, dans le contexte sud-africain, embrasse les valeurs démocratiques de l’égalité et des droits de l’homme, et la reconnaissance de la diversité. Cependant, la recherche indique que les changements de la société, comprenant les réformes et les changements contextuels, aussi bien que la gestion de la diversité dans les écoles, ont eu un impact négatif sur la réalisation de l’éducation incluse. Dix ans après la démocratie, la tension entre changer la structure de l’éducation et changer ses procédures continue à influencer le progrès. Mettre en valuer la reconnaissance et l’acceptation des droits fondamentaux de tous les enfants sud-africains d’être reçus dans les commun autés scolaires incluses, reste donc un défi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainscow, M. (1999).Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainscow, M. (2003).Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change. Paper presented at the International Congress on Inclusive Education, Hong Kong Institute of Education, December.

  • Babbie, E., & Robinson, S. (2000). Socio-economic policies: Their impact on children in South Africa. In D. Donald, A. Dawes, & J. Louw (Eds.),Addressing childhood adversity (pp. 30–45). Cape Town: David Philip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughan, M., & Shaw, L. (2000).Index for inclusion. Bristol: Centre for studies on Inclusive Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothma, M., Grayett, S., & Swart, E. (2000). The attitudes of primary school teachers towards inclusive education.South African Journal of Education.20(3), 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafouleas, S.M., & Riley-Tillman, T.C. (2005). “Accepting the gap” an introduction to the special issue on bridging the research and practice.Psychology in the Schools.42(5), 455–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P. (1999). Inclusive education in South Africa: Achieving equity and majority rights. In H. Daniels & P. Garner (Eds.),World yearbook of education (pp. 150–168). London: Kogan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., & Green, L. (1998). Mainstream teachers’ attitudes to the mainstreaming of learners with special educational needs in primary classrooms: A Western Cape study.South African Journal of Education.18(2), 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (1995).White Paper on education and training in a democratic South Africa Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (1997).Quality education for all: Report of the National Commission for Special Needs in Education and Training (NCSNET) and the National Commission on Education Support Services (NCESS). Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (2001).Education White Paper 6. Special needs education. Building an inclusive education and training system. Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (2002).An evaluation of the Danida-SA project on inclusive education. Pretoria: Unpublished research report.

  • du Toit, L. (1996). An introduction to specialized education. In P. Engelbrecht, S.M. Kriegler, & M.I. Booysens (Eds.),Perspectives on learning difficulties (pp. 1–14). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A., & Forlin, C. (1999). A theoretical framework for inclusive education. In P. Engelbrecht, L. Green, S. Naicker, & L. Engelbrecht (Eds.),Inclusive education in action in South Africa (pp. 21–44) Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, P. (1999). A theoretical framework for inclusive education. In P. Engelbrecht, L. Green, S. Naicker, & L. Engelbrecht (Eds.),Inclusive education in action in South Africa (pp. 3–12). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, P. (2003).External evaluation of the SCOPE Component 3: Introducing inclusive education. Pretoria: Unpublished research report for SCOPE and the Department of Education.

  • Engelbrecht, P., Howell, C., & Bassett, D. (2002). Educational reform and the delivery of transition services in South Africa: Vision, reform and change.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals.25 (2), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, P., & Oswald, M. (2005).Trialing the index for inclusion. Stellenbosch: Unpublished research report for UNESCO.

  • Engelbrecht, P., Oswald, M., Swart, E., & Eloff, I. (2003). Including learners with intellectual disabilities: stressful for teachers?International Journal of Disability, Development and Education.50(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forlin, C. (2004). Promoting Inclusivity in western Australian schools.International Journal for Inclusive Education.8(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (2001). Theoretical and contextual background. In P. Engelbrecht & L. Green (Eds.),Promoting learner development. Preventing and working with barriers to learning (pp. 3–16). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, C., & Lazarus, S. (2003). Access and participation for students with disabilities in South African higher education: Challenging accepted truths and recognising new possibilities.Perspectives in Education, 21(3), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSRC, (2005).Emerging voices: A report on education in South African rural communities. Pretoria: HSRC Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. (2001). The race for education policy after apartheid. In Y. Sayed & J. Jansen (Eds.),Implementing education policies: The South African experience (pp. 12–24). Lansdowne: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed method research: A research paradigm whose time has come.Educational Research, October, 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loebenstein, H. (2005).Support for learners with intellectual disabilities in the transition to secondary schools. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch. [Unpublished PhD Thesis]

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomofsky, L., & Lazarus, S. (2001). South Africa: First steps in the development of an inclusive school system.Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(3), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamlin, N. (1999). Despite best intentions: when inclusion fails.The Journal of Special Education.33, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishna, N. (2001). Changing roles for schools and communities. In P. Engelbrecht & L. Green (Eds.),Promoting learner development. Preventing and working with barriers to learning and development (pp. 45–56. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishna, N., & Sader, S. (2004). Social capital and the development of inclusive schools and communities.Perspectives in Education, 22(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishna, N., & Schoeman, M. (2000). From “special needs” to “quality education for all”: A participatory, problem-based approach to policy development in South Africa.International Journal of Inclusive Education.4(4), 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naicker, S.M. (2005). Inclusive education in South Africa. In D. Mitchell (Ed.),Contextualising inclusive education (pp. 230–251). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, M., Ackermann, C., & Engelbrecht, P. (2000). Onderwysers se houdings teenoor inklusiewe onderwys [Teachers’ attitudes to inclusive education].Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 40(4), 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S., Johnstone, C., & Ferguson, P. (2005). A disability rights in education model for evaluating inclusive education.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9(2), 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prozesky, A.M. (1999).Die gesindhede van onderwysers van ’n tradisioneel swart primere skool ten opsigte van insluiting van leerders met gestremdhede [The attitudes of teachers from a traditional Black primary school regarding the inclusion of learners with disabilities]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria. [Unpublished MEd dissertation]

    Google Scholar 

  • RSA (Republis of South Africa) (1996a).Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSA (Republic of South Africa) (1996b).South African Schools Act 84 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samoff, J. (1996).Frameworks! South African education and training policy documents. 1994–1996. Durban: Macro-education policy unit, University of Durban-Westville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandkull, O. (2005).Strengthening inclusive education by applying a rights-based approach to education programming. Paper presented at ISEC Conference, Glasgow.

  • Sayed, Y. (2000).Post-apartheid educational transformation: Policy concerns and approaches. Paper presented at AEKA Conference, New Orleans.

  • Sayed, Y. (2002). Democratising education in a decentralised system: South African policy and practice.Compare, 32(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalem, Y. (2003). Do we have a theory of change? Calling change models to account.Perspectives in Education.21(1), 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, E., Engelbrecht, P., Eloff, I., & Pettipher, R. (2002). Implementing inclusive education in South Africa: Teachers’ attitudes and experiences.Acta Academica.34(1), 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, E., & Pettipher, R. (2000). Barriers teachers experiences in implementing inclusive education.International Journal of Special Education, 15(2), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, E., & Pettipher, R. (2001). Changing roles for principals and educators. In P. Engelbrecht & L. Green (Eds.),Promoting learner development. Preventing and working with barriers to learning (pp. 30–44). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1994).Salamanca Statement and framework on special needs education. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waghid, Y., & Engelbrecht, P. (2002). Inclusive education, policy and hope: Mapping democratic policy changes on inclusion in South Africa.International Journal of Special Education.17(1), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welgemoed, A. (1998). Democratising schools in South Africa. In C. Harber (Ed.).Voices for democracy: A North-South dialogue on education for sustainable democracy (pp. 37–47). Nottingham: Education Now Publishing Co-operative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (2000). Building an inclusive education and training system: Critical issues in the national policy framework for South Africa. Paper presented atNational workshop: Danida-SA Project, Johnnesburg, August.

  • Young, L. (1990).Justice and the politics of difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partially funded by UNESCO and the author extends gratitude to UNESCO and the parents, teachers and children who took part in the research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelbrecht, P. The implementation of inclusive education in South Africa after ten years of democracy. Eur J Psychol Educ 21, 253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173414

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173414

Key words

Navigation