Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on cancer screening

Perspective from the national cancer institute

  • Screening
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force evaluated the medical literature, utilizing strict criteria to judge the merits of experimental trials designed to show benefit in screening for cancer. For individuals at normal risk, the task force was not able to make recommendations for or against screening for colorectal, prostate, skin, oral, or testicular cancers. Only one physical-examination cancer-screening procedure has ever been tested in a randomized trial. During the past 27 years, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has funded six randomized screening trials. Thusfar, only one bas shown a decrease in mortality. Recognizing the limitations of such trials, the NCI published “Working Guidelines for Early Cancer Detection.” Designed for the practicing physician, these guidelines were based upon the best available evidence and on the judgment of representatives of medical professional organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 Interventions. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation 1985–2000. NCI Monograph #2:1-105, J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986.

  3. Prorok PC, Miller AB. Screening for cancer. International Union against Cancer Tech Rep Ser. 1984;78:10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1988;4.

  5. The history of the TNM system. World Health Organization Tech Rep Ser. July 1952; no. 53; 47–8.

  6. Feinleib M, Zelen M. Some pitfalls in the evaluation of screening programs. Arch Environ Health. 1969;19:412–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Early diagnosis. In: Clinical epidemiology—a basic science for clinical medicine. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown, 1985;148.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett DL. Screening in family practice: prevention, levels of evidence, and the pitfalls of common sense. J Fam Pract 1987;24:233–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller AB. Screening for cancer. New York: Academic Press, 1985;17.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic screening for breast cancer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989;37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Connor RJ, Chu KC, Smart CR. Stage-shift cancer screening model. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:1083–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu CC, Smart CR, Tarone RE. Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for health insurance plan clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80:1125–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu KC, Byar D, Smart CR. Lung cancer screening revisited. In preparation, 1990.

  14. Obler SK, LaForce FM. The periodic physical examination in asymptomatic adults, Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:214–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sackett DL. Controversy in the detection of disease. Lancet. 1975;1:357–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: recommendations and rationale. CA 1980;30(4);4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. American Cancer Society. A survey of physicians’ attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA 1985 (July/August); 203.

  18. National Cancer Institute. Working guidelines for early detection, Early Detection Branch, NCI, 1987.

  19. Lawrence RS. Report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 1990;263:436–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smart, C.R. The impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 5 (Suppl 2), S28–S33 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600837

Key words

Navigation